What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
RicukStu
Junior Member
Posts: 121
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 10:23 am

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by RicukStu »

Sorry to hijack the thread somewhat but as a left handed Ric player, I've heard/read various conflicting statements regarding the current manufacture of left handed Rickenbackers. If John is still here and willing to give a us leftys a definitive answer to the question, are you still taking orders or manufacturing left handed Rickenbackers?
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by cjj »

Well, Ben Hall, the production Manager at RIC said that they have Lefty 4003's scheduled for the first half of next year and plan on running other left hand models during 2011...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by rickenbrother »

Spike- wrote:
rickenbrother wrote:
Clint wrote:Heaven's Complaint Department: My cloud's not fluffy enough. Is gold the only finish these harps come in? Can't I get one in jetglo? Where's all the cool people....?
I have no doubt that there are people who would find faults in Paradise!
If they don't have JetGlo then it ain't Paradise.
You got that right! :mrgreen:
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by cjj »

:roll:


:lol:
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
nukebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 707
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2001 6:21 pm

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by nukebass »

The original poster mentioned something about innovation. This is probably something for a separate topic, but I wonder how much true innovation is left in guitar design. How much more can be done to the instrument itself that would be new and unique? There are always ways to improve production and efficiency (like the new UV coating RIC is using), but that doesn't change the basic instrument design. I figure most innovation is left in playing the instrument. In that light, I think it is unfair to criticize any guitar manufacturer for lack of innovation, especially when the manufacturer has a formula that works and the customer likes.
User avatar
Grey
Advanced Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by Grey »

Honestly, I find it hilarious that people could complain about a lack of ingenuity or innovation, of all things, about Rickenbacker. Rick's are one of the few guitars that are completely and wholly distinct from other brands. A Rick dosen't look like anything else, it's just a Rick. They're no stranger to innovation either, like the converter models or slanted frets. Rather than being a gimmick they actaully tried to provide useful features a guitarist would want, even if they wern't terribly successful.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by johnallg »

johnhall wrote:FYI, in case it was buried in the noise, my dad's name was Francis. Unfortunately, many people got it confused with Frances which, quite naturally, wrankled him, hence the almost universal use of "F.C." since he was a child. Only a very few people called him Frank and he thought they were total idiots. Most everyone, including me in public called him "F.C.". Only my mom and his very best 85 year-long friend called him "Francis".
I caught that John, even before you pointed out the op's mistakes, your father's name being one of them. :lol:
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by johnhall »

Spike- wrote:Of course, maybe that's a bit unfair since Rickenbacker is privately owned, though that just futhers the idea that the 'status quo' at Rickenbacker is making guitars, not making press confrences.
Gibson is privately owned as well but Henry has many more irons in the fire and other important matters to attend to.
User avatar
Grey
Advanced Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by Grey »

johnhall wrote:Gibson is privately owned as well but Henry has many more irons in the fire and other important matters to attend to.
Shows what I know.
User avatar
jimk
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5355
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:27 am
Contact:

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by jimk »

johnhall wrote:
Spike- wrote:Of course, maybe that's a bit unfair since Rickenbacker is privately owned, though that just futhers the idea that the 'status quo' at Rickenbacker is making guitars, not making press confrences.
Gibson is privately owned as well but Henry has many more irons in the fire and other important matters to attend to.
Well now...........Image
JimK
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by paologregorio »

"Continuous refinements and improvements."

.. . . .and more purchases from me as soon as I'm out of law school. I'm planning on a JG 360/12 C 63, and perhaps a JG 4003 bass to match. :)
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by ram »

Although he doesn’t have to, I appreciate Mr. Hall’s participation here and his clarifications to some of the misbegotten notions expressed. I for one enjoy both web sites (I comment more here because it is a little chattier than the corporate site). I am looking forward to the corporate upgrades! If you don’t like the corp. site don’t go there or start your own (it’s real easy, ask Peter, hahahaha). If you don’t like the way the company is doing things start your own. Otherwise my credo is – I don’t tell Mr. Hall how to run his company and he doesn’t tell me how to play my basses… this has worked well for me since ’74.
The only thing we can perceive are our perceptions - George Berkeley
harley
Member
Posts: 254
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 2:10 pm

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by harley »

ram wrote:Although he doesn’t have to, I appreciate Mr. Hall’s participation here and his clarifications to some of the misbegotten notions expressed. I for one enjoy both web sites (I comment more here because it is a little chattier than the corporate site). I am looking forward to the corporate upgrades! If you don’t like the corp. site don’t go there or start your own (it’s real easy, ask Peter, hahahaha). If you don’t like the way the company is doing things start your own. Otherwise my credo is – I don’t tell Mr. Hall how to run his company and he doesn’t tell me how to play my basses… this has worked well for me since ’74.

Acknowledging the hi-jack, does John Hall play bass? If I owned the company, I'd have one of everything (two or more if I was going for specific colors) and I'd play it all, even if I couldn't play a lick. ;)

My guess is, just from being around it all his life, John and the fellow Halls can probably play pretty well. Anyone know for sure (aside from the Hall family members)?
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by cjj »

Yes, John Hall plays bass, and perhaps other instruments too. There are pictures on the RIC website of him in his band a long time ago, and still more with his current band, Hautewerk, here:

http://www.hautewerk.com/

Edit: Here's the older pic from the RIC site:
http://www.rickenbacker.com/gallery_ima ... _year=1960
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
gareth
Intermediate Member
Posts: 655
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 8:55 am
Contact:

Re: What's the future hold for the Rickenbacker company?

Post by gareth »

There's a reason I've stuck with Rickenbackers through thick and thin over the last 30 years. It's precisely because they don't change much. It's vitally important to me that I can rely on the build, quality, construction and above all else, the sound.

You've only got to look at Gibson with their bewildering array of Les Paul models, 75% of which don't play or sound like Les Pauls to see where the madness of chasing the market leads. Actually, it leads to Guitar Center now that I think about it. One of the best decisions RIC ever made was to walk away from that crapfest.

RIC has been clever enough to make the market come to it either by accident or design. In return the players learn to put up with the idiosyncrasies in the company. Of course I'd like John to produce basses personally tailored to my taste, but I'm quite happy with the selection his family have produced in the last 75 years.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”