Rotosound RS66LD don't fit in the nut on new 4003

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
Berthos
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:25 am

Rotosound RS66LD don't fit in the nut on new 4003

Post by Berthos »

G'day guys and girls,

I have just bought a nice new Fireglo 4003. I was hoping some of you more experienced Ric owners might be able to help me with a problem I have.

I use Rotosound RS 66LDs on my Warwick Fortress and I love them!. I want to put them on my Ric too, however the A and D strings are a bit too thick to fit into the nut. Is this a common problem?

Also, the scale length on my Warwick is a bit longer than the Ric. Is the Ric considered a long scale bass? Or should I be using different Rotosounds on my Ric?

Any assistance you can provide would be appreciated.

Regards,
Rob.
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Rotosound RS66LD don't fit in the nut on new 4003

Post by cjj »

Hmm, I've used the RotoSound RS66LD sets for years with no problems. Perhaps the nut slots were filed just a bit narrow. Most guitar repair guys can file them a bit, or you can do it yourself if you've got the tools.

The scale length for a Rick 4000 series bass is considered long scale and you should use long scale strings.
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Rotosound RS66LD don't fit in the nut on new 4003

Post by aceonbass »

Stock RIC bass strings are .45/.55/.75/.105. The Rotos are .45/.65/.80/.105. You'll need to get the appropriately sized nut files to enlarge the A and D slots.
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Rotosound RS66LD don't fit in the nut on new 4003

Post by cjj »

Well, that would 'splain it. They must have done a better job of filing yours than mine. Though I must admit all of my newer Ricks have the stock strings on 'em...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
Berthos
New member
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 7:25 am

Re: Rotosound RS66LD don't fit in the nut on new 4003

Post by Berthos »

Thank you all for your replies. I don't know that I have the guts to take a file to my new Ric though!
User avatar
86kubicki
Advanced Member
Posts: 2727
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Rotosound RS66LD don't fit in the nut on new 4003

Post by 86kubicki »

I've always used a set of small round files to make adjustments to the string channels on my basses. You should be able to do this yourself, but just go slow!
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Rotosound RS66LD don't fit in the nut on new 4003

Post by cjj »

Yes, it's not all that difficult, and you're really removing a very small amount of material. Dane missed a zero on the above sizes, they should be:

RIC: .045, .055, .075, .105
Roto: .045, 065, .080, .105

So, for the D string, you need to enlarge by .010 inch, the A string by .005 inch...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”