stupid flats question

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
Prowl
Member
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:41 pm

stupid flats question

Post by Prowl »

ok so my store currently has Chromes and GHS Precision Flats. The Chromes are 50-105 and the GHS are 55-105. The GHS strings however are stainless. I'm just trying to figure out which of the two I'd be safer with? Thanks guys
User avatar
NFB-418
Member
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:32 am

Re: stupid flats question

Post by NFB-418 »

Prowl wrote:ok so my store currently has Chromes and GHS Precision Flats. The Chromes are 50-105 and the GHS are 55-105. The GHS strings however are stainless. I'm just trying to figure out which of the two I'd be safer with? Thanks guys
The Chromes are stainless, too. My personal opinion - I wouldn't go with either set. I would recommend the 40-100 Chromes. http://www.juststrings.com/dad-ecb84.html

I've been using those for about 6 months now and I love them. Plus, they're much more balanced than the two sets you've mentioned. A close to perfectly balanced set, IMO, would be 45, 60, 80, 105. Unfortunately, you'd have to mix and match Chromes to achieve this.

Also, I know that resident stringmeister Cassius recommends Fender 9050L and they're an almost perfectly balanced set. http://www.juststrings.com/fnd-9050l.html

If you're intent on buying one of the sets you mentioned, I would get the Chromes. Although they're not the most well balanced set, they're way better than the GHSs.
“'What was that note?' I told him it was a B natural, the third of G dominant 7 going back to C minor, and I can't talk while I'm playing so don't ask me any more questions." - Ron Carter to Miles Davis
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13114
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: stupid flats question

Post by rickenbrother »

I very satisfied with the the D'Addario Chromes ECB84 set .040 - .100 which is balanced well enough for me and more so than most popular sets of any type and brand of strings.
The JETGLO finish name should be officially changed to JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4455
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: stupid flats question

Post by woodyng »

i have tried the fender set mentioned above on a nonric bass, and they were pretty wonderful. i preferred them to chromes,also the ghs are really good,and are also available in a 40-100 gauge,which should be perfect for a ric. and my favorite string maker,DR, makes a flatwound i have never gotten around to trying,so i am not sure of the available gauges .....but they are probably great strings,like most DR'S.....
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: stupid flats question

Post by cassius987 »

The Fender 9050L set, and later 9050CL (due in 2011, replacing .100'' E with a .105'' string), is my top choice for flats...
Prowl
Member
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:41 pm

Re: stupid flats question

Post by Prowl »

I was incorrect, the GHS strings are 45-105, which is what I normally use in Roundwound
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: stupid flats question

Post by ken_j »

Although I am not technically a bass player I have had the GHS Precsion Flatwound™ (stainless 0.105") on my 4000 for a number of years. I like them and the neck hasn't moved a bit.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: stupid flats question

Post by cassius987 »

I find a bass with older truss rods--that is well-maintained--can be strung up pretty much however you like and the neck won't move.
User avatar
congerz83
Intermediate Member
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:14 am

Re: stupid flats question

Post by congerz83 »

I hated the Chromes... I've used GHS Precisions (lightest guage possible... check website) and nothing else on all my three 4000' series.
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
Prowl
Member
Posts: 258
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:41 pm

Re: stupid flats question

Post by Prowl »

I'm using the GHS also and I'm loving them right now. I would like to get a set of TI's but I'm broke so its not an option. But if anyone feels compelled to buy me a late birthday present/early Christmas present feel free lol :mrgreen:
User avatar
Ric N. Backer
Member
Posts: 427
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:12 pm

Re: stupid flats question

Post by Ric N. Backer »

Prowl wrote:ok so my store currently has Chromes and GHS Precision Flats. The Chromes are 50-105 and the GHS are 55-105. The GHS strings however are stainless. I'm just trying to figure out which of the two I'd be safer with? Thanks guys
I use Chromes with the .100 & .080 (E & A( strings and they sound great. I have Rotosound 77 (flats; .105 & .085) on another bass (Fender Jazz) and they sound good as well. The Roto's are higher tension so I don't use them on the Ric.
If Mozart were with us today, he'd play a Fireglo 4001C64! ~~~*~~~ Beethoven, on the other hand, would play a Matte Jetglo 4001C64S!
User avatar
iiipopes
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1444
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: stupid flats question

Post by iiipopes »

Cassius turned me on to the new Fender flats. I have been a roundwound guy for the 35+ years I've played bass. I've tried them all, and each time went back to rounds. LowEndLover gave me a 105 of the new formulation so I could have a preview of the new 9050CL set coming out. They have more growl than D'Addario chromes, which to me sound hollow, although it is a "classic" tone they have better articulation than LaBellas; they don't make my hands black or feel as "rubbery" to me as TI's (sorry, my hand perspiration literally eats nickel); they have less tension so you don't need as much truss rod tweaking as with Rotosound monels, and have more character and consistency from string to string than GHS or Ernie Ball flats; they don't go "thin" in tone as you go up the neck; and they have that tru flat-wound vibe that the half-rounds or ground-rounds don't.

The first time I rehearsed with my 9-piece dance band with them, they brought out the vibe so well I could tell the guys sat in the groove together much better as a band, and these are guys who have been playing together for going on 15 years (I'm the new kid on the block, only having been with them a couple of years now). The "feel," overall intonation and tonal characteristics, and the support they gave to the band were just that superior.
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: stupid flats question

Post by antipodean »

Gotta try those Fenders next time - I have used Chromes, TIs and Pyramids and like them all. Maybe I'm just easy to please....
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”