330 Small Headstock Years?

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

HeavySoul
New member
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:21 am

330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by HeavySoul »

Can anyone tell me what years 330 have small headstocks?
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by godber »

There's some crossover in production but around 1984 was the change to the bigger (50's style?) I'd say.
HeavySoul
New member
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:21 am

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by HeavySoul »

Thanks Mark, do you know when they change back to smaller headstocks? I understand that the latest 330s have small headstocks (I could be wrong, it has been known :lol: ).
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by godber »

Again there is a transition period, but 2007 would be when the new smaller shape came in - and very welcome they were too!
egosheep
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:29 pm
Contact:

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by egosheep »

I think the bigger headstock's came about because of the tuner change. The Schallers were bigger and needed more real estate on the headstock.
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by electrofaro »

egosheep wrote:I think the bigger headstock's came about because of the tuner change. The Schallers were bigger and needed more real estate on the headstock.
Both my 340 and 360 have a small headstock as well as Schaller tuners, thus that can't be the reason why they switched to bigger headstocks around 1984, unless the Schallers also became smaller?
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
egosheep
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:29 pm
Contact:

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by egosheep »

Wildberry wrote:
egosheep wrote:I think the bigger headstock's came about because of the tuner change. The Schallers were bigger and needed more real estate on the headstock.
Both my 340 and 360 have a small headstock as well as Schaller tuners, thus that can't be the reason why they switched to bigger headstocks around 1984, unless the Schallers also became smaller?
I'm sure someone knows better than me, but I seem to recall hearing that. The Schallers used back then were bigger. When you look at the previous small headstocks, they are using Kluson style tuners, then some have stock Grover rotomatics, then others have the Kluson-like Grover slimline tuners. Then came the bigger headstocks and the Schaller era.

I realize the newer headstocks still use Schallers but I think it's a smaller tuner.
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by jingle_jangle »

Schaller makes a mini (currently in use by RIC) and a larger die-cast sealed tuner. I'm not sure how the use of these intersects with the size changes in headstocks.

I can tell you about my 360WB (a 1982), which has the largest paddle headstock I've seen. It was apparently drilled for Schallers, but fitted with Grover Rotomatics. The result of this mismatch is that the tuning keys for the Grovers have less than 1/16" clearance with the headstock. It arrived in my hands in 2005 with the paint badly chipped around most of the tuners as a result.
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by electrofaro »

egosheep wrote:I realize the newer headstocks still use Schallers but I think it's a smaller tuner.
jingle_jangle wrote:Schaller makes a mini (currently in use by RIC) and a larger die-cast sealed tuner. I'm not sure how the use of these intersects with the size changes in headstocks
If the smaller Schaller is about the same price as the bigger one, then it would make sense to use the small ones and make the headstock smaller to cut some costs.
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
egosheep
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:29 pm
Contact:

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by egosheep »

jingle_jangle wrote:Schaller makes a mini (currently in use by RIC) and a larger die-cast sealed tuner. I'm not sure how the use of these intersects with the size changes in headstocks.

I can tell you about my 360WB (a 1982), which has the largest paddle headstock I've seen. It was apparently drilled for Schallers, but fitted with Grover Rotomatics. The result of this mismatch is that the tuning keys for the Grovers have less than 1/16" clearance with the headstock. It arrived in my hands in 2005 with the paint badly chipped around most of the tuners as a result.
It's interesting that your 82 has a paddle headstock. I'm going to drive to Ohio in January to pick up an '83 330JG(July 83, specifically), and it has a small headstock. It has Rotomatics now, but you can see the extra screw holes from either Grover Slimlines or Klusons which were on it originally. I have a NOS set of the Slimlines which I will be putting on it to take it back to original. I'm hoping the bigger Rotomatic washers don't leave a mark on the headstock face. If so, it may need to be sanded and clearcoated.
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
HeavySoul
New member
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 1:21 am

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by HeavySoul »

Anyone got a comparison shot of a large and small headstock? Also why are small headstocks preferred?
egosheep
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:29 pm
Contact:

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by egosheep »

HeavySoul wrote:Anyone got a comparison shot of a large and small headstock? Also why are small headstocks preferred?
Attachments
comparison.jpg
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
egosheep
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:29 pm
Contact:

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by egosheep »

comparison 2.jpg
The smaller headstocks are closer to what a vintage headstock looked like on certain guitars, so it's a look that a lot of people find attractive. Larger headstocks have their place in Ric history, too though... such as the 50's Capri headstocks. But for most Ric's I prefer the smaller sizes, with kluson style tuners.
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
User avatar
deaconblues
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2390
Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by deaconblues »

I don't think that last picture is correct. The slimmer headstock on the right labeled "1990" was only produced on the 1997(ish) and up 325v63. All other models were produced with the large headstock until about '07.

My '93 330 has the center style.
egosheep
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:29 pm
Contact:

Re: 330 Small Headstock Years?

Post by egosheep »

dpowell wrote:I don't think that last picture is correct. The slimmer headstock on the right labeled "1990" was only produced on the 1997(ish) and up 325v63. All other models were produced with the large headstock until about '07.

My '93 330 has the center style.
That's serial # K34666. I thought it seemed odd as well, but the date is correct.

I wasn't really going by dates, I just wanted to show a comparison of big vs small. I thought a matching background would be easier to compare side by side.

Edit: upon checking the register, it's clear that a lot of 355's in 1990 had the smaller headstock.
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”