4003 vs 4001C64
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
- coolhandjjl
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 621
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:42 pm
Re: 4003 vs 4001C64
One guy has a '97 4001v63 with a slim neck. Another guy has an '98 4001v63 with a fat neck. I love my Rics, but this neck thing really is a can worms when looking for one. So from what I have read (aside from flipped headstocks), v63's had necks all over the place, but c64's got the neck issue under control, and all are slim?
'09 4003 | '93 4003s
John Luke aka Coolhand
John Luke aka Coolhand
Re: 4003 vs 4001C64
My April '98 4001V63 has a slim neck, virtually the same as that on my March '73 4001.
- rickenbrother
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 13218
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am
Re: 4003 vs 4001C64
The whole slim neck thing is somewhat ridiculous in my opinion. Might as well make bass guitars with broom sticks for necks for some guys!coolhandjjl wrote:One guy has a '97 4001v63 with a slim neck. Another guy has an '98 4001v63 with a fat neck. I love my Rics, but this neck thing really is a can worms when looking for one. So from what I have read (aside from flipped headstocks), v63's had necks all over the place, but c64's got the neck issue under control, and all are slim?
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! 
Re: 4003 vs 4001C64
Would be too much radius on the fretboard for my taste. Otherwise this really is a great idea!rickenbrother wrote: Might as well make bass guitars with broom sticks for necks for some guys!
68 4001|73 4001 MG|75 4000 MG|81 4001S AZG|86 4003 MID/BT|86 4003 Shadow|88 4003s Blackstar|89 4003 Grey/BT FL|93 4004 Ci|96 4003S/8 FG|98 4003S/5 JG|05 650D|05 4004Cii/5 TG|08 660/12 JG|18 4003S/5 MID|19 4003S/5 WAL ||TR35B|RB 30||
- rickenbrother
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 13218
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am
Re: 4003 vs 4001C64
berth wrote:Would be too much radius on the fretboard for my taste. Otherwise this really is a great idea!rickenbrother wrote: Might as well make bass guitars with broom sticks for necks for some guys!
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! 
Re: 4003 vs 4001C64
No, if they were all fat, then they would be under controlcoolhandjjl wrote:... but c64's got the neck issue under control, and all are slim?
I like the thick, round back neck on my ’79, over the slimmer and flatter neck on my ’96 V63.
Re: 4003 vs 4001C64
Hey! What's the big idea with you guys dissin' my broomstick fretboard??!?!?!?!?rickenbrother wrote:berth wrote:Would be too much radius on the fretboard for my taste. Otherwise this really is a great idea!rickenbrother wrote: Might as well make bass guitars with broom sticks for necks for some guys!
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
- rickenbrother
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 13218
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am
Re: 4003 vs 4001C64
I guess it's okay, there's no lines!cjj wrote: Hey! What's the big idea with you guys dissin' my broomstick fretboard??!?!?!?!?
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! 
