The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Kees
New member
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:04 am

The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by Kees »

Hi guys,

I have been away for a while and maybe this issue has been discussed previously, but I wondered if anyone has noticed, like I did, that the 360 shape has changed in 2010. Post-1991 models clearly have a more pointy upper cutaway (the big one) than pre-1991 models (I did not like this change). And now I noticed that new models again have a more rounded upper cutaway. Is it just me or has anybody else observed this phenomenon as well?

Best wishes,
Kees
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by electrofaro »

Hoi Kees - welkom!

I compared some pictures and personally I don't see any difference.
Do you have any pictures where you think you can clearly see it?
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
Kees
New member
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:04 am

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by Kees »

Yeah I do. [img]C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/889660/Desktop/360%20bodies.jpg[/img]
Kees
New member
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:04 am

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by Kees »

But how do I post this picture? Ah, I just read the instructions (well done, Kees!). The 1997 shape of the upper cutaway was typical for the post 1991 360's. Before that, they are rounder, just like the 2010 version(s). I like the new (=actually old) shape, btw. Kees
Attachments
360 bodies small.jpg
Kees
New member
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:04 am

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by Kees »

And another example below. The right one is an FG from 2009, the other one is probably 1-2 years earlier, but it does already have the full-width inlays (when were these re-introduced?):
Attachments
360 FG bodies.jpg
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by electrofaro »

Well, all I can say is you got a good eye, Kees!
There is definitely a difference.
My '07 360 has the more pointy upper horn.
I think full width inlays is early 2008 on? Or maybe end 2007 - my 2007 doesn't have them at least.
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
Kees
New member
Posts: 69
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 6:04 am

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by Kees »

For me, they even have a different 'feel'. I own an 360 MG, a 360/12 BG and a 360 CW Ltd Ed. JG (which is for sale) with the pointy cutaway type and an older 360 FG (1991) with the rounder type. The latter one clearly looks different (and more balanced) to me. It is, however, also the 'hand-made charm' of Rickenbackers, these little differences among copies of a single model.

Groeten, Kees
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by electrofaro »

My '07 360 and '08 340 are about a year apart, but they sure feel different in the neck.
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
360girl
Member
Posts: 230
Joined: Fri Jun 25, 2010 7:59 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by 360girl »

IMO they have changed. I used to have a '94 jetglo 360, and not only was the upper horn larger than the upper horn on my 2009 mapleglo 360, but the headstock was wider too. The necks are similar, but not qute the same (my 2009 360 seems to have flatter neck profile than my 1994 360 had).
BILLYC58
New member
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:14 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by BILLYC58 »

Wow I never noticed that before good eye.
Billy
User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by wim »

Kees wrote:But how do I post this picture? Ah, I just read the instructions (well done, Kees!). The 1997 shape of the upper cutaway was typical for the post 1991 360's. Before that, they are rounder, just like the 2010 version(s). I like the new (=actually old) shape, btw. Kees
Bridge position seems to have moved also.
User avatar
winston
Membership Admin
Posts: 11010
Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2005 5:00 am

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by winston »

It's a source of amazement to me how our members have noticed subtle variations in shape that occurred over the years. Kee's you have a great eye for detail. :D
“We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.” - Albert Einstein

"You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother" - Albert Einstein
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12652
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by doctorwho »

winston wrote:It's a source of amazement to me how our members have noticed subtle variations in shape that occurred over the years. Kee's you have a great eye for detail. :D
+1! :)
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by electrofaro »

wim wrote:Bridge position seems to have moved also.
In what way, as I don't see any difference in Kees' examples?
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
Clint
Intermediate Member
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:03 pm

Re: The 360 body shape: has it changed again?

Post by Clint »

To me, the biggest change is in the width of the R tailpiece ramp. It's a lot narrower now and doesn't follow the curve of the pickguard.
Jangle, Chime & Twang.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”