Are 1973 basses models special?

Transition years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1973-1983 inclusive

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
Knork
New member
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:52 pm
Contact:

Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by Knork »

I'm new to Rickenbacker basses and want to get me one. Now I've seen some 1973 models that are higher priced than those from other years. Coincidence or are they somewhat more collectable or of a special quality?
tgoode
New member
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:31 pm

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by tgoode »

I know that '73 was the last year of checkered binding. That's generally more desireable.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by rickaddict »

Yes, they are more special.

Especially for those who have one and/or want to sell one.

8)
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by sloop_john_b »

tgoode wrote:I know that '73 was the last year of checkered binding. That's generally more desireable.
Also, last year of crushed pearl inlays and the toaster pickup at the neck position (not counting reissues).

These is a cutoff though - most '73's made after July (except Joeys) do not have checkered binding, and the crushed pearl was stopped around February. They had the cool full-width poured inlays until about May, which is also a desirable feature. You'll notice that ones made later in the year are a lot cheaper (or at least they should be!).
User avatar
Danotron
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1423
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:07 pm

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by Danotron »

Some of the early '73's still had the full width inlays as well and they are kind of a unique material to that year.

I think they're special (and, yes, I have one!) :)

(Oops, JB beat me to it! Sorry for the repeat)
Last edited by Danotron on Thu Feb 03, 2011 12:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by rickaddict »

Quality is not any different.

In '73, a lot of the earlier features were gradually phased out. So the earlier you get in 1973, the more valuable a Rick bass tends to be as collectors prefer those earlier features.

Things that were phased out in '73 were:

-Full width crushed pearl inlays, which transitioned to swirly inlays for a month or two before finally becoming the smaller "floating" swirly inlay.

-Aluminum gap-toothed tail piece and bridge.

-Checkered binding.

-Toaster pickup

-1/2 inch spaced neck pickup
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by sloop_john_b »

rickaddict wrote: -1/2 inch spaced neck pickup
Silly Jeff. That lasted into '75! :lol:
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by rickaddict »

sloop_john_b wrote:
rickaddict wrote: -1/2 inch spaced neck pickup
Silly Jeff. That lasted into '75! :lol:
Oh. Oops!

8)
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

by my records, the 1/2 " spacing was phased out by april/may '75 excepting the whiteglo basses for some reason that run months later (probably because they were old stock and jackplated later, or just using up the black pickguards ???) the '76 i just repaired accepted a 1/2 " spaced pg.

'73 non-deluxe 4001 basses also were the first year for the neck and bridge button top higains ( which i still have the neck p/u from MJ-4844.) body wings started to get thicker by '74.

my MD-1252 had the crushed shell full width inlays.
User avatar
chrisdski
Intermediate Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:15 pm

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by chrisdski »

I noticed nobody mentioned the Grovers. Wonder why? :twisted: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37337
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by jps »

To the topic question............

Mine is! :D
User avatar
Knork
New member
Posts: 29
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 2:52 pm
Contact:

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by Knork »

Thanks for infos. So it's all rather cosmetic only?

The serial number revealed a 1973 that got offered to me as a 1976 though.
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by kiramdear »

It's an historic, transitional year for design, largely of interest to collectors and connoisseurs. Nothing radically different in the way they play and sound.
All I wanna do is rock!
User avatar
johnnysain
Member
Posts: 467
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:00 am

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by johnnysain »

I believe, other than the merely ornamental,....the Schaller's and Zinc bridge were improvements (versus the Grover's and Aluminum).
Rickenbacker player since 1978
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: Are 1973 basses models special?

Post by antipodean »

The zinc bridge and tailpiece adopted in mid-'73 allowed more travel for the saddles - some folk have remarked that the aluminium bridge did not have sufficient travel to achieve correct intonation on some string sets. The flip side is that the old aluminium tailpieces are pretty much immune to tail lift.

Oh... and Rickenbacker didn't use Schaller tuners until the mid-80s. The 4001 reverted to Klusons in late '73 due to some QC/design issues with the Grovers.
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Transition Years - 1973 to 1983”