Anyone know what kind of prototypes these are?

[egosheep]

The two on the lower right, and the third from the right on top:



Looks like a 320 hollow body with the upper horn of a 450... Or rather, a 450-style with a ramp and 3 pickups. Also the unusual two knob(or is it three?) control configuration.

The one on top is weird, looks like it has two toasters scrunched together... a ToastBucker? They all look full scale, too.

[jps]

The two lower ones are prototypes for a Jackson Browne guitar that was never produced; I know of the TUR one for sure, and I assume the JG one was just an alternatively finished version. The one in the upper row looks like another version of same in FG with some detail differences, perhaps?

[egosheep]

The two lower ones are prototypes for a Jackson Browne guitar that was never produced; I know of the TUR one for sure, and I assume the JG one was just an alternatively finished version. The one in the upper row looks like another version of same in FG with some detail differences, perhaps?

Cool, Jeff! Thanks for the info. Wonder if there are any better pics in the ether...

[egosheep]

I dug up these JH quotes from an old thread:

There's three of these guitars, all of which I have. Two have finish on them, one only has a sealer. There are a few other small differences.

It's a different sound as they are wired in a full humbucking mode, i.e. the single coils are wired to work together in humbucking mode. They do less of the jangle and have more of a growl. Also, the neck shape is quite different, clubby by my taste, but what Jackson and Scott Thurston wanted.

There is also a photo of one of them on page 62 of the Bacon and Day book, according to the thread.

[weemac]

What about that thing lurking behind the Lemmy prototype. It looks like the lovechild of a 4001s and a 4005

Eden.

[jps]

That's the bass I want!

[electrofaro]

Two with maple fretboard and one with rosewood by the looks of it... they look small and fat, but kind of cool at the same time!

[badeggs]

What about that thing lurking behind the Lemmy prototype. It looks like the lovechild of a 4001s and a 4005

That's in the Smith book - a solid 4005 prototype? Dammit, I can picture the page it's on but not the caption!

[egosheep]

Two with maple fretboard and one with rosewood by the looks of it... they look small and fat, but kind of cool at the same time!

Almost looks like the c58 body thickness. I'm thinking these are probably hollow.

[electrofaro]

Almost looks like the c58 body thickness. I'm thinking these are probably hollow.

I hope so, Thomas, as they'd weigh a ton solid (I'm quite biased about solidbodies).

Does anybody know if the necks are bolt-on? I mean, with the way the body and neck are sprayed different reminds me of bolt-on...

[ken_j]

What about that thing lurking behind the Lemmy prototype. It looks like the lovechild of a 4001s and a 4005

That's in the Smith book - a solid 4005 prototype? Dammit, I can picture the page it's on but not the caption!

Page 205 "Experimental 4001S from 1967 with two under-string pickups."

[egosheep]

Does anybody know if the necks are bolt-on? I mean, with the way the body and neck are sprayed different reminds me of bolt-on...

I don't think they are bolt-ons... there are precedents for this kind of separate finish, after all:

[sloop_john_b]

That experimental 4001s was used by John Paul Jones live in 1969.

[electrofaro]

Does anybody know if the necks are bolt-on? I mean, with the way the body and neck are sprayed different reminds me of bolt-on...

I don't think they are bolt-ons... there are precedents for this kind of separate finish, after all

Yeah, you're probably right there. Such a thing would look lovely on a 480 btw.

[Ivan3000]

Wild idea...

Someday, I'd like to buy an old 4001/3S JG and make it into that one behind the lemmy. With JH's permission of course. Would i be allowed to do that?