Discontinued 350/12V63

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
GSRIC
New member
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:08 pm

Discontinued 350/12V63

Post by GSRIC »

Hi Guys,
Would like to hear some comments/opinions about this nice Ric model that is now officially discontinued. Those who have owned the guitar, who own it now,
its attributes, and drawbacks if any, etc. Also its advantages/disadvantages over the 325's. Also - how hard it was/is for members to go from larger Rics such as the 360/12V64 to the small Lennon style bodies. Any comments about the guitar (or the 325's) would be appreciated....thanks in advance. :D
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Discontinued 350/12V63

Post by JakeK »

I never really had much experience with a 350/12, but I think it was trying to combine John's 325/12 and something that was easier for players. I'm guessing (and no one bite my head off if I'm wrong) that it probably sold in smaller numbers and was discontinued to help clear out the backlog. It was derived from a John Lennon signature model, the 350/12JL. On a side note for a brief time in late 1999/early 2000, the 325/12 was reissued shortly before the Carl Wilson models came out. Fellow forumite Matt Bowling owns one of these.

Our own Bill Mahony briefly toyed with a 350/12 (one I pointed him to), and I'm sure he could give you an idea of what to expect from one.

Its 6-string cousin, the 350V63 has been much more popular.

Advantages over the 325: If you do not feel you'll be comfortable on a 3/4 20 inch neck, but like the standard scale, then that is a pro.
Disadvantages: It does not have the precise Lennon look, and the pickups are spaced further apart. The body is slightly bigger, about as big a 600-series model. it also does not come with a Vibrato unit, instead with a flat tailpiece
User avatar
libratune
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4255
Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 9:06 am
Contact:

Re: Discontinued 350/12V63

Post by libratune »

I have a 350/12V63 in FG and I like it.

IMO the main difference from a 360/12V64 is that it weighs less and has no soundhole, so it is not as resonant acoustically as the 360. The 350 has less of an "open" sound when played through an amp, so it sounds more like a solidbody 12er.

As the 350 has three PUs, you can do a popular wiring mod to have a separate volume control for each PU. I haven't tried this but some have and seem to like it.
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Discontinued 350/12V63

Post by paologregorio »

I had the chance to play Graham's 350/12 JL; it was pretty cool! I'd say get buy a 350/12 if you love Ricks, love 12 strings, and like a smaller-bodied guitar. :D
GSRIC
New member
Posts: 71
Joined: Thu Jul 09, 2009 9:08 pm

Re: Discontinued 350/12V63

Post by GSRIC »

Thanks for your replies, guys.... :D
BILLYC58
New member
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:14 pm

Re: Discontinued 350/12V63

Post by BILLYC58 »

Its a shame they discontined the 350/12 one of these days id like to get one maybe they will reissue it again fingers crossed.Have you found one ?
Billy
laplacian
New member
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 12:30 pm

Re: Discontinued 350/12V63

Post by laplacian »

Beautiful model. will be missed.
sleepingtiger
New member
Posts: 98
Joined: Sun Apr 24, 2011 2:53 am

Re: Discontinued 350/12V63

Post by sleepingtiger »

Damn! That's one that I really wanted! Fat chance for that in the future.

Tony
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”