+1FretlessOnly wrote:I wish I understood 10% of that.
I think they look perty
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
+1FretlessOnly wrote:I wish I understood 10% of that.
cjj wrote:Watch it Bill, you're starting to sound almost as nerdy as me...
![]()
![]()
FretlessOnly wrote:I wish I understood 10% of that.
songdog wrote:High frequencies go through a capacitor easier than low frequencies. In the tone control circuit, the cap is used to short high frequencies to ground. The low frequencies can't go through the cap, so they are still available to drive the amp. In this circuit, it is the DC resistance of the coil and the capacitor that form a voltage divider that depends on frequency.jps wrote:Well then, a smaller cap. So, it works the same way as a tone cap, that larger the value the more lows it passes? I know that a tone cap is in parallel, so I thought a series cap would work the opposite way, please enlighten me.songdog wrote:I'm not clear what you meant to say about a "larger cap". A larger cap would pass more lows (it's in series with the pickup).
The cap in series with the bridge pickup blocks low frequencies from reaching the amp, but lets the high frequencies through. In this circuit, it is the capacitor and the volume pot that form the voltage divider.
In either case, to a first approximation the "corner frequency" (where the resistance and the capacitance divide the the voltage evenly between them) is 1 / (2 * pi * R * C), where R is ohms and C is farads. So, for example, if the DC resistance of the pickup is 7.5k, and the tone control is fully CCW (effectively connecting the .047 cap directly to ground), the tone control kicks in around 450 Hz (anything above that will be seriously attenuated).
I need to find a nice way to post diagrams here... words may not be an adequate explanation.
I typed "1/2πRC" into a Google search and got a lot of hits, including this one with diagrams:nukebass wrote:... This is info I've been wanting to know for years! What is a good source to look at this in more detail?
I think he is also the inventor of the Johnson Rod and SWAG Factor formulae.rickaddict wrote:So it sounds to me like the capacitor works in much the same way as the turbo encabulator, which is thoroughly explained in this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ac7G7xOG2Ag
How did he get through all that with a straight face?rickaddict wrote:So it sounds to me like the capacitor works in much the same way as the turbo encabulator, which is thoroughly explained in this video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ac7G7xOG2Ag
I better update my files, I didn't realize there was more than one.coolhandjjl wrote:I think he is also the inventor of the.....SWAG Factor formulae.