..but missed all in between...Bucksstudent wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WcwX3NzZPg
I did this to show what you can do on a 360.
The clean sound btw is instantly the sixties to me who grew up with the music and the brit invasion.
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
..but missed all in between...Bucksstudent wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WcwX3NzZPg
I did this to show what you can do on a 360.
When I think of sixties music, I think of all the tax attorneys who were once hippies - They own Rics too.trosse wrote:..but missed all in between...Bucksstudent wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8WcwX3NzZPg
I did this to show what you can do on a 360.I use mine fopr just about everything. Great sound and great guitar - my 360.
The clean sound btw is instantly the sixties to me who grew up with the music and the brit invasion.
I think you get it. The Ric is a fascinating instrument in many ways, but the fact that it's pigeonholed by the majority of guitarists, means that there's a limited market. Maybe you should encourage otherwise?jingle_jangle wrote:...and your point is...?
My tax attorney comment was a generalization, but a joke in some sense. I don't like the vibe I get from a lot of players - Gibson, Ric, Fender, whatever. For some reason, though, I always get trashed more when making a statement about Ric, and usually by someone who was old enough to go to Woodstock.jingle_jangle wrote:I think you mean Roger McGuinn, or possibly Jim before that...
Which is a part of my implied point--there's always going to be a generational thing, and to paint any generation with a broad brush, or draw conclusions from narrow samples for anything excepting humorous or ironic purposes, serves nobody well.
Bucksstudent wrote:I think you get it. The Ric is a fascinating instrument in many ways, but the fact that it's pigeonholed by the majority of guitarists, and even John Hall himself (Look at the AD Campaigns), means that there's a limited market. Maybe you should encourage otherwise?jingle_jangle wrote:...and your point is...?
As I have said on other boards, there's a reason why George/John stopped using them when the Beatles made their best albums. There's a reason John McGuinn became less prominent in the Byrds on their last few albums - When they were diversifying themselves. What's the ratio of older Ric players versus younger ones?
Maybe you'd see more young kids, who want to be the next Jimi Hendrix or just an innovator, picking up a Ric if they were shown that it was more than just "sixties" music their dad listens to (Not just the Beatles - The sixties had it's fair share of really bad music too, just like any decade). I tried to do that with my Youtube video, but I also pointed out the negatives of the guitar, brand, etc because of my own experiences. Maybe I would not have done such a harsh thing if not provoked. I might even still have my Ric if I was shown a little more kindness from the Ric community (Excluding here - People have been tolerant so far; so far...).
Could you translate this, Patrick? My Woodstock-polluted mind can't quite wrap itself around this turn of phrase...Bucksstudent wrote: I still love the sound of a Rickenbacker; especially once played in the twenty-first century.
Here you go:larsongs wrote:Thanks for sharing Buckstudent.
Would like to hear more of our Forum Members performing Lead Solos on Ric's & sharing Gear what they use to get their Sound.
Thanks again,
Glenn
There are alot of great lead players playing Ric's! Great stuff! keep 'em coming.scotty wrote:Just spent the last 10 minutes running over BIGBANG on YT and had a ball listening what a top band. Øystein Greni is a top player.
viewtopic.php?f=47&t=393249&hilit=Bigbang
'Tis great, but unfortunately played on a Gibson SG on the record....paologregorio wrote:I really like Paul Weller's solo in "Start!"