Tom Petersson's 4001

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by aceonbass »

This could be a completely reversable mod as long as there were no extra holes drilled in the bass to mount the guard. Then again...it just looks plain weird to have no bridge pickup at all.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by johnallg »

Looks cool. It also kinda looks like PW on Gretsch! :lol: :lol:

Looks like he put something in place for bigger pole heads.
RobRick
Member
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:14 pm

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by RobRick »

I think it looks great!

If you never use the bridge PU, seems like a logical mod to me. Petersson favors the neck PU on all his basses, going so far has to take out the bridge PU on some of his Waterstone 12 string basses, leaving a gaping cavity where the PU once was.
rickaddict
Senior Member
Posts: 6163
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 7:46 am

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by rickaddict »

To each his own. Sounds to me like all he needed to do was remove the pickup cover and flip the switch up. But it's his bass to do with as he pleases.

Always needing to inject my opinion though, I gotta say... I see (and hear) absolutely no benefit/improvement to this mod other than reducing the weight of the bass.
User avatar
coolingitdown
Intermediate Member
Posts: 595
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:47 am

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by coolingitdown »

But if it was an original horseshoe, then the surround was magnetized and therefore could not be removed.

Then again, if you weren't going to use that pick up anyway, I suppose there wouldn't be any harm in removing the surround. To each his own, I suppose.
2010 4003 FG
1997 4003FL Turquoise
Set neck 4001S (color TBD)
RobRick
Member
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:14 pm

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by RobRick »

I think it is really cool. It's not like the bass was butchered or anything. If he wanted, he could have it reverted back to a regular 4001. I am seriously thinking of doing this at some point, as I rarely use the bridge PU and mainly use the neck PU.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by jps »

coolingitdown wrote:But if it was an original horseshoe, then the surround was magnetized and therefore could not be removed.
By that time (actually, quite a bit before that timeframe) the 4001 had a hi-gain pickup in that position, the horseshoe pickup was gone by around '68-'69.
RobRick
Member
Posts: 325
Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 7:14 pm

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by RobRick »

From what I have read, Petersson originally had a blue Rick 4001 he bought in 1969 but did not like how the HS PU got in the way of his playing. So he later bought the '72 4001 and had it modified to be a neck PU only bass.

I think it looks really unique, with the binding and MG finish. I have never been a MG fan, but this bass looks really great IMO.

It really isn't that outrageous a modification. People have purchased 4000 basses and modified them to be a 4001, which is a much more radical mod.
Last edited by RobRick on Fri May 06, 2011 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by jps »

RobRick wrote:It really isn't that outrageous a modification
I agree.
User avatar
berth
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by berth »

I like this mod. My first Rick was a 4000 and (since my second Rick was a 4001 FL) I knew I missed a neck pickup. I like the simple look of the 4000. I like neck pickups sounds wise. This mod makes sense to me.
68 4001|73 4001 MG|75 4000 MG|81 4001S AZG|86 4003 MID/BT|86 4003 Shadow|88 4003s Blackstar|89 4003 Grey/BT FL|93 4004 Ci|96 4003S/8 FG|98 4003S/5 JG|05 650D|05 4004Cii/5 TG|08 660/12 JG|18 4003S/5 MID|19 4003S/5 WAL ||TR35B|RB 30||
User avatar
mgauction
Advanced Member
Posts: 2360
Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by mgauction »

I really like that bass! Good video!
Leprosy is rare & scarce but nobody wants that!
User avatar
gearhed289
Intermediate Member
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 9:51 am
Contact:

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by gearhed289 »

RobRick wrote:I think it looks really unique, with the binding and MG finish. I have never been a MG fan, but this bass looks really great IMO.

It really isn't that outrageous a modification.
+1!
'89 4003S, '92 4001CS, '93 4003S/8
www.nomadichorizonband.com
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

RobRick wrote:I think it looks great!

If you never use the bridge PU, seems like a logical mod to me. Petersson favors the neck PU on all his basses, going so far has to take out the bridge PU on some of his Waterstone 12 string basses, leaving a gaping cavity where the PU once was.

kinda like the gretsch guitar malcolm young plays with ac/dc with the two pickups out of it.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by jps »

This might look good as a single pickup bass. 8) :wink:
User avatar
marc61
Senior Member
Posts: 6443
Joined: Sat Aug 09, 2003 9:31 am
Contact:

Re: Tom Petersson's 4001

Post by marc61 »

I have it on good authority that Tom used a 4001v63 on one of the songs on their latest album
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”