Since the feedback is probably coming from the vibration of the top, dampening it with a third pickup would go along way towards solving your problem, if not curing it completely.Matt Clark wrote:Now I want to make my 330 into a 340 and get the same kind of performance out of that guitar as well, but I don't think that is possible if it remains a semi-hollow guitar.
.
Solid body from semi-hollow
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
Jangle, Chime & Twang.
- paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6376
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
Aren't LP's chambered these days as well?
If you really want a solid guitar, consult a luthier about the possibility of removing the back and blocking it.
You could also look into the possibility of having the p/up rewound to 14K. I have rewound 14K toasters in the bridge positions of four of my Ricks; I have pretty much zero "squeal" issue, and have great sustain.
Squeal has a lot to do with the way the tone controls are set on the amp and on your effects as well. I used to get the "ice pick" squeal early on when playing my Rick with the tone controls set the same way I set them when using my Gretsch Silver Jet, or a Strat; they're different guitars, so the tone controls need to be set differently. I tried a few things like the old PT trick of stuffing the sound hole with news paper, or foam padding, both of which were not effective for me.
If you really want a solid guitar, consult a luthier about the possibility of removing the back and blocking it.
You could also look into the possibility of having the p/up rewound to 14K. I have rewound 14K toasters in the bridge positions of four of my Ricks; I have pretty much zero "squeal" issue, and have great sustain.
Squeal has a lot to do with the way the tone controls are set on the amp and on your effects as well. I used to get the "ice pick" squeal early on when playing my Rick with the tone controls set the same way I set them when using my Gretsch Silver Jet, or a Strat; they're different guitars, so the tone controls need to be set differently. I tried a few things like the old PT trick of stuffing the sound hole with news paper, or foam padding, both of which were not effective for me.
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
[quote="Spike-"]Probably sound about as good as this does.
Is that the new Chinese Brickenbacker?
Is that the new Chinese Brickenbacker?
Last edited by jingle_jangle on Fri May 13, 2011 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- electrofaro
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3611
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
You sure it ain't a Rockenbacker?jingle_jangle wrote:Is that the new Chinese Brickenbacker?
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
- paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6376
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
Or Rockandbricker. . .Wildberry wrote:You sure it ain't a Rockenbacker?jingle_jangle wrote:Is that the new Chinese Brickenbacker?
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
Nope. The headstock says "Brickenbacker".
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
You guys are all way off...
Things Go Better... With

Things Go Better... With
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
-
Matt Clark
- Junior Member
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 5:23 pm
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
I will have to ask my tech exactly what he did as I didn't have much input, other that to tell him I wanted to preserve as much RIC look as possible but get a more dynamic tone variety from the guitar, specifically Fender tones. I was going to do the 5-way, but he worked around that and made the pan pot work differently. I know it was a complicated endeavor for him. He flipped a magnet so that when the middle pickup is in the mix (when the toggle switch is in the center position) they work together like a humbucker so the noise cancels out. He called this the Nashville sounds. Then when you use the pan pot it gives you all of the "out of phase" strat/tele sounds. He beefed up the cap on the neck pickup which is where the deep Les Paul like tones are coming from and lightened the bridge cap too. It's really bad-*** and I am still playing with it to figure out what all it can do! I know he wired the stereo plug so it works by putting the neck on one side and the bridge on the other and then the middle pickup just cancels out the single coil hum. I'll probably never use that option, but it is there! All in all, he's a pretty smart duck!jdawe wrote:How did you wire in the middle p/u on your 620-- did you tie it in parallel to the neck p/u as is done on a 370, or did you do something different? I've always been curious about what a 3-p/u RIck would sound like with a Strat-like 5-position switch, although it might be tricky to integrate that with the Rick-o-Sound wiring (I haven't given this any real thought).I just had a third RIC high gain pickup added to my 620 and had it rewired. It has now become the most versatile guitar I've ever heard--period. I can get everything from a deep Les Paul tone to a tele/strat and she still sounds like a RIC too. And, he used all of the same pots and toggle so it still look like it should (with the extra pickup of course). Simply outstanding!
This guitar is a 1991 white with black trim and hardware, and the third pickup a bought off e-bay from a butchered guitar, thus keeping them all black! Not only does it sound great it looks awesome. When I get some photo's shot I'll post them! I'm actually considering cutting an appropriate sized cats eye "sound hole" through the body and binding it in black. I think it would keep the RIC look but add a little style to it. Something different to make people go, where did he get that? What do you think?
Rickenbacker Fan in Texas
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
so cute!!!FIREGLO67 wrote:Prawn Crackers?scotty wrote:and if you spend over a tenner you bl**dy better get prawn crackersMateybob wrote: Just don't ask them for a Number 008 though, you might end up with fried rice.
No problem.
http://www.dhgate.com/wholesale/prawn+crackers.html

Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
This thread made my brain hurt.

- Tony Baloney
- New member
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 11:16 am
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
why dont you just buy a Les Paul?
1964 - "she loves you, yeah, yeah, yeah"
1969 - "and in the end, the love you take, is equal to the love you make"
1968 370 f
Guild 1993 d50
Gibson 1979 LP Artisan
Fender 2005 Amercan Standard Jazz bass
2011 4003 Mapleglo
1969 - "and in the end, the love you take, is equal to the love you make"
1968 370 f
Guild 1993 d50
Gibson 1979 LP Artisan
Fender 2005 Amercan Standard Jazz bass
2011 4003 Mapleglo
- kennyhowes
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 5022
- Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
- Contact:
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
Matt, you're going to have to bring that 330 over so can see what it is you want that you're not getting from it.
- electrofaro
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3611
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
Yeah, a weight relieved or chambered versionTony Baloney wrote:why dont you just buy a Les Paul?
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
Re: Solid body from semi-hollow
If its worthless, Ill take it off your hands, Ill give you 400 dollars for the troubleMatt Clark wrote:That's kinda why I'm asking, right?larsongs wrote: What happens if you fill it with something solid & you don't like the weight or the sound? The Guitar is pretty much worthless isn't it?
Actually, I have a 320, a 360/12 a 620 and this 330, and as it stands [and I know what I am about to say is sacrilege] it's already about worthless, but I love how it looks and would love to turn it into something I can use.
