77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
TheCurvedEarth
New member
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:50 pm

77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Post by TheCurvedEarth »

I need to replace the ****** aftermarket bridge on my 77' 4001, and im not sure weather to get a new hipshot or wait until I can find a vintage one on ebay, or when i get to 50 posts, i can find one on here maybe.

anyone have any experience with the hipshots? Im not sure what to do here... so any help would be great!

Thanks.
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: 77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Post by antipodean »

Hi Brett,

A couple of quick questions:

- Was the fitting of the aftermarket bridge on your 4001 accompanied by filling in the rout for the stock tailpiece? If it did, the Hipshot bridge will require the least work to fit, as you won't have to rout out the filled cavity.
- Are you after a complete "vintage" look to your 4001? If so, the stock tailpiece and bridge is the way to go.
- Are you located in North America? If so, the stock part can easily be sourced from the Rickenbacker boutique, though I note that the bridges (a separate part to the tailpiece) are currently unavailable. If you're not located in North America, the stock bridge and tailpiece will be quite a bit harder to lay your hands on than the Hipshot.

If you're ambivalent about vintage look or "authenticity", then the Hipshot is worth a look. They are way easier to adjust for intonation than the stock bridge, and there is no discernible change in tone when moving from the stock tailpiece/bridge to the aluminium Hipshot (I have no experience with the brass Hipshot, which has substantially more mass). It is also easier to palm mute with the Hipshot as it provides better access to the strings at that crucial are near the bridge. Some users have had issue with saddle movement, but that hasn't yet happened to me. Finally, the Hipshot is substantially cheaper than the stock part at USD145 - the stock tailpiece is priced at USD190 and the bridge at USD75. If you're working to a budget, that may swing things.

I personally prefer the look of the stock part. By the same token I fitted a Hipshot to my battered 4000 (the original part was donated to a restoration project) and I have been sufficiently impressed to have retained it.

I also note that you mention "vintage bridge". The current stock part will be a drop-in replacement for the original tailpiece/bridge on your '77 4001 and will. I believe, be a little stronger than a period-correct part. There is no need to look for an old part if you choose the Rickenbacker over the Hipshot.
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
User avatar
RicOSoundMan
Member
Posts: 203
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 8:36 pm

Re: 77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Post by RicOSoundMan »

antipodean wrote:There is no need to look for an old part if you choose the Rickenbacker over the Hipshot.
Ditto....... :lol: :mrgreen:

I personally would opt for the new Ric bridge,.....
My Ric Basses are:
76' 3000 MG ---09' 4003 MG
77' 3001 MG ---92' 2060 FG
77' 4001 Jetglo---93' 2060 FG
Other
08' Fender "Geddy Lee" Sig. Jazz Bass
82' Kawai F-II-B
User avatar
TheCurvedEarth
New member
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: 77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Post by TheCurvedEarth »

Thanks for the replies guys!
User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Re: 77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Post by heinpete »

RicOSoundMan wrote:
antipodean wrote:There is no need to look for an old part if you choose the Rickenbacker over the Hipshot.
Ditto....... :lol: :mrgreen:

I personally would opt for the new Ric bridge,.....
:roll: ...there is a good reason for the recent new RIC bridge (rigidness improved), as the `77 model bridge surely is prone to tail lift! :shock:
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: 77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Post by woodyng »

i wasn't aware that the current 4003 bridges were being made any differently than vintage ones,and at $265 for both pieces,would opt for the hipshot aluminum bridge,too,for all the reasons mentioned above. i have one on my 74 4000,and it has been perfect and rock-solid since i put it on. i have had roundwound and flatwound strings on it. no wobble and even better,no knucklescrapes from mute knobs. i would sell you my old bridge parts,but i realize at some point,(NOT ANYTIME SOON!) i will probably sell my bass,and want to have the all the original equipment available for potential buyers.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Post by johnallg »

Woody, somewhere during the years of the current tailpiece RIC beefed up the underside of the tail area some. I don't remember when that was. Jeff Scott has a pic of the underside of all three side by side showing the differences.
Tailpieces_Bottom_3981_800.jpg
User avatar
berth
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1723
Joined: Tue Jun 06, 2006 7:06 am
Contact:

Re: 77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Post by berth »

Do a search on Hipshot on this forum before you buy one. Not everyone (that includes me) is satisfied with them.
68 4001|73 4001 MG|75 4000 MG|81 4001S AZG|86 4003 MID/BT|86 4003 Shadow|88 4003s Blackstar|89 4003 Grey/BT FL|93 4004 Ci|96 4003S/8 FG|98 4003S/5 JG|05 650D|05 4004Cii/5 TG|08 660/12 JG|18 4003S/5 MID|19 4003S/5 WAL ||TR35B|RB 30||
User avatar
TheCurvedEarth
New member
Posts: 18
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:50 pm

Re: 77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Post by TheCurvedEarth »

I actually don't need one anymore. But I appreciate all the responses.
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: 77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Post by woodyng »

john-i remember that photo-i'll take the bridge on the left,please..... :mrgreen:

which,IIRC,is the original late 60's era aluminum one,the one that everyone raves about,and the same material as the hipshot i have on my bass now.....
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: 77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Post by jps »

woodyng wrote:john-i remember that photo-i'll take the bridge on the left,please..... :mrgreen:

which,IIRC,is the original late 60's era aluminum one,the one that everyone raves about,and the same material as the hipshot i have on my bass now.....
Um, here is the front side of it, Woody.
Jeff-1200_9647.jpg
As you can see, it is currently being used to hold some strings in place and won't be available for the foreseeable future. :mrgreen:
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: 77 4001 Rickenbacker Bridge?

Post by woodyng »

:lol:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”