PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
NFB-418
Member
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:32 am

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by NFB-418 »

Just curious (and I assume this has been done) - has anyone removed the foam pad? If so, how much does it affect the tone versus just having the pad set at a medium-low height?
“'What was that note?' I told him it was a B natural, the third of G dominant 7 going back to C minor, and I can't talk while I'm playing so don't ask me any more questions." - Ron Carter to Miles Davis
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by rickenbrother »

If the foam pad is removed, your bass won't sound any different from when you don't have the foam pad touching the strings.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
coolhandjjl
Intermediate Member
Posts: 621
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 5:42 pm

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by coolhandjjl »

jingle_jangle wrote:..., backed with nylatron washers. Nylatron is graphite-impregnated nylon, so it's self-lubricating......
Are those commonly available, or a do you have to order them from someplace like Fastenall, McMaster, etc? Does the graphite work its way down into the threads themselves?

rickaddict wrote:.....I've found that getting the mute to work on my Ricks is approximately 65% about trimming and repositioning the foam pad, and 35% finding springs that allow the bolts to turn freely...
I was changing strings on my 4003, so I took off the tailpiece, removed the mute and trimmed the foam. I added a tiny bit of graphite to the threads also.

Sure works easier now. :D

But I still don't use it. :lol:
'09 4003 | '93 4003s
John Luke aka Coolhand
User avatar
NFB-418
Member
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:32 am

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by NFB-418 »

rickenbrother wrote:If the foam pad is removed, your bass won't sound any different from when you don't have the foam pad touching the strings.
That obviously makes sense. I suppose that was a stupid question but, for some reason, I was thinking that the pad might affect resonance either way.
“'What was that note?' I told him it was a B natural, the third of G dominant 7 going back to C minor, and I can't talk while I'm playing so don't ask me any more questions." - Ron Carter to Miles Davis
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by cjj »

NFB-418 wrote:
rickenbrother wrote:If the foam pad is removed, your bass won't sound any different from when you don't have the foam pad touching the strings.
That obviously makes sense. I suppose that was a stupid question but, for some reason, I was thinking that the pad might affect resonance either way.
Well, if you remove the foam pad and crank the metal backing plate up against the strings, I'd think it would affect the sound just a bit...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by ken_j »

cjj wrote: Well, if you remove the foam pad and crank the metal backing plate up against the strings, I'd think it would affect the sound just a bit...
Like a honky tonk piano?
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by cjj »

Probably more sitaresque...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
Ivan3000
Advanced Member
Posts: 2392
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by Ivan3000 »

cjj wrote:Probably more sitaresque...
Sitar bass? Interesting. Rickensitar!
Looks like its already been done! Illegally though.
Image

How about a RIC - OUTLET one of! In Pink! with a Horseshoe and all cool stuff! The neck inlay could be going through the whole thing, A giant Rickenbacker nameplate inlay! And make it a lighthshow!
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by aceonbass »

MiroN wrote:
aceonbass wrote:I removed the mute and made extensive modifications to this 70's 4001 tailpiece....
Dane, can you show me a photo of the bass?
Yes Mario. Here it is......
Attachments
4004L5MID 001.JPG
4004L5MID 003_crop.jpg
4004L5MID 004_crop.jpg
User avatar
Grey
Advanced Member
Posts: 1659
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2010 4:10 pm

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by Grey »

aceonbass wrote:Yes Mario. Here it is......
Is that an FretFx system on it?
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by aceonbass »

Yes, and as soon as Roz switches over to mass production, custom scale lengths like the Rick's 33 1/4" will no longer be possible. My '09 4004Cii5 FG has a set of red FretFX's.
User avatar
MiroN
Member
Posts: 384
Joined: Thu May 14, 2009 8:22 am
Contact:

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by MiroN »

aceonbass wrote: Yes Mario. Here it is......
many thanks,

It's a cool project.
My Basses' Name:
4001White 1981-11-W.
4003Jetglo 1992-04-Mr.B.B.
4001Mapleglo 1974-06-Tre
4004Walnut 1994-09 CI-Giusy
4004Mapleglo 2003-05 CII (Fretless 4-2-5)-Amo
4004Jetglo 1994-12 Laredo-Ruso
4003Mapleglo 1988-08 LK-Lemmy
2030MidnightBlue 1992-08-Nino
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by electrofaro »

cassius987 wrote:Not sure what a "quad pickup" is however.
Just noticed this... isn't that more like four small pick-ups, one for every string?

Maybe Ric should come up with a conversion kit for those who like a modernised version of their 4003? :!:
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
Darkbass
New member
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 1:43 pm

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by Darkbass »

Why doesn't Rickenbacker just offer a different bridge, without the mute? Sell it on their website. Something that looked more stock than the Hipshot. I used my mute for a couple of minutes when I first bought my 4003, and didn't care much for it. It looks cool, but it gets in my way. I used to cut my pinky finger up on the adjustment knobs while picking at shows all the time. Only mod I'd likely do to my Rick, other than removing the treble pickup cover.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: PUTTING THE SCREWS...

Post by rickenbrother »

cjj wrote:
NFB-418 wrote:
rickenbrother wrote:If the foam pad is removed, your bass won't sound any different from when you don't have the foam pad touching the strings.
That obviously makes sense. I suppose that was a stupid question but, for some reason, I was thinking that the pad might affect resonance either way.
Well, if you remove the foam pad and crank the metal backing plate up against the strings, I'd think it would affect the sound just a bit...
Well,I never would have thought of cranking up a foam less metal backing plate up against the strings. But I've seen people use an E string as an A string (tuned to A) because they broke their A string and had an extra E string. So what some people think of to do, really doesn't surprise me. :roll: :lol:
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”