650 vs 660 neck

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

650 vs 660 neck

Post by electrofaro »

Are the 650 and 660 neck basically the same? There's an oh so slight difference being shown on the 12th fret width over at the Ric site, and it made me wonder, if that's just binding adding a bit of width to 660 necks or if they're actually really different?

Just another Wednesday evening with nothing do to question that popped into my mind :mrgreen:
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4886
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

650 vs 660 neck

Post by 8mileshigher »

I have a 650 Atlantis from 1996 and a 660-12 from 2004 and the Atlantis seems a bit more "thick" around, than the modern 660-12, which has a bound neck. Probably the technology of cutting and shaping the necks changes over time.... or when the CNC machines were introduced.

The widths are supposed to be the same, I believe.
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: 650 vs 660 neck

Post by ken_j »

The necks are the same width at the nut, but I believe that the 650 is wider at the higher positions. The 650 strings are spaced wider at the bridge. The 650 has 24 frets and the 660 has 21.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 650 vs 660 neck

Post by jingle_jangle »

The 660 neck has always felt like a "fat D" to me. Strangely flat on the back.
User avatar
manta
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1338
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Contact:

Re: 650 vs 660 neck

Post by manta »

Yes, I'd agree with Paul. The 650 is rounder on the back and thicker or fuller (is that a word?) overall. Both play nicely. The 650, of course, is not varnished.

Best,
Manta (Tim Rock)
http://www.mantaraymusic.com
1993 Plus FG, 730L-12, 4001FL, Danelectro 6/12, Storyboard Strat
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4886
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

650 vs 660 neck

Post by 8mileshigher »

manta wrote:The 650, of course, is not varnished.
Are you referring to the 650 Dakota and Sierra models, with the oil-finish ?

My '96 650 Atlantis mentioned before has the highest-gloss, conversion varnish fretboard of any of my Rics.
User avatar
manta
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1338
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Contact:

Re: 650 vs 660 neck

Post by manta »

Yep, I have a 650 Dakota! My only 650 series experience.
Manta (Tim Rock)
http://www.mantaraymusic.com
1993 Plus FG, 730L-12, 4001FL, Danelectro 6/12, Storyboard Strat
User avatar
analogpackrat
Member
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:34 am

Re: 650 vs 660 neck

Post by analogpackrat »

My JG 650C has an ample neck. It's not a baseball bat, but is definitely on the thicker side. It also has a very glossy varnished maple fretboard like Rich's Atlantis. I know the spec is 10" radius, but it seems flatter to me. Maybe it's the width that makes it seem that way.
If it is to be, it is up to me.
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: 650 vs 660 neck

Post by ken_j »

My former 650C was fairly thin front to back.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: 650 vs 660 neck

Post by electrofaro »

Thanks for the replies - just struck me as odd the necks would be different in other ways than just amount of frets. If I get a solid body Rickie, it would be a 660 JG 6er, but I'd swap to humbucking, and add an R tailpiece :mrgreen:
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 650 vs 660 neck

Post by jdogric12 »

Do you want your neck enormous or gigantic? :lol:
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: 650 vs 660 neck

Post by ken_j »

One other thing not mentioned is that the 650 has jumbo frets compared to the 660.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4886
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

650 vs 660 neck

Post by 8mileshigher »

ken_j wrote:One other thing not mentioned is that the 650 has jumbo frets compared to the 660.
Yes, that's a very good point that we forgot to mention. Those bigger frets are one of the outstanding features on the 650 that make it enjoyable to play.
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: 650 vs 660 neck

Post by electrofaro »

Jumbo frets? Mmm... can't say I got any preference there.
jdogric12 wrote:Do you want your neck enormous or gigantic? :lol:
Jason, both might be too slim :P
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
suedehead71
Member
Posts: 282
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 2:59 am

Re: 650 vs 660 neck

Post by suedehead71 »

i owned a 650C in jetglo back in 96 or so, and yes, it definitely felt a lot thicker to me. great for lead lines and such, not so great for chording, in my opinion---it was not a keeper for me in the long run, though i would gladly own a 650Atlantis on appearance alone! :D
i will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, de-briefed, or numbered.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”