Your brain only has TWO sides?




Moderator: jingle_jangle
Wildberry wrote:Anyway, I still wanted to make a version with a smaller, elevated scratchplate. I kept the general shape, only made it to about 2/3 of what the current size is. This allows for much better knobs positioning, imo. Maybe I should try to see if I can photoshop a translucent one?
All closed wouldn't look that great on a 360, imo. I don't like the f-hole shape at all on a 360, it just doesn't fit the modern shape. There are some versions above with two cat eyes, btw! With 360F you mean the 2nd, 60s version with knobs all along the bottom? I tried it, but it didn't look okay to me... I prefer the 1st, 50s 360F over the 2nd one anyway, just because of the knobs, scratchplate and elongated hole - all three just don't do it for me. Anyway, I'm no master of photoshop either, you know - just give it a try Ivan!IvanMunoz wrote:How about you just find a way to put in a bound f-hole, or no hole at all some how (Like the 325C58) that would make it different.
Or maybe give the knobs the configuration of a 360F ('68 I think) have no pickguard, and have 2 Cats eye, or F sound holes.
I would make one, but my MS paint skills are very poor!![]()
It's not a GibsonKees wrote:I would place the 5 knobs on the headstock and a third soundhole on the back.
This looks awesome! Any chance you could bash out a 4005 version in photoshop for me to salivate over?Wildberry wrote:Anyway, I still wanted to make a version with a smaller, elevated scratchplate. I kept the general shape, only made it to about 2/3 of what the current size is. This allows for much better knobs positioning, imo. Maybe I should try to see if I can photoshop a translucent one?
How's it coming, Paul?jingle_jangle wrote:We're keeping the model a secret until it emerges from its cocoon...
Oi, we had already forgotten about that part of the threadjingle_jangle wrote:The teasing is in your minds, Werner, both of them...