4003 neck reshape

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
mad_phingers
New member
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:53 pm

4003 neck reshape

Post by mad_phingers »

Before anyone gets too upset, let me say that this is just an idea at this stage, I am far from taking action.

I have an '03 4003 with a rather thick neck and I have thought before about the possibility of thinning it down a bit. For one, I will never sell this bass, it has far too much history with me. I also have had a lot of problems with the neck getting really sticky. I sweat a lot, so I probably wouldn't miss having a gloss finish on the back of the neck.

My questions are really just, how thin can I go before I run the risk of getting too close to the rods, and how likely is it that I will create warping/bowing issues by doing this. And are there are tonal differences to expect?

I don't think I would make it too thin... maybe just take the finish off plus another 1/16"

The neck also has a C shape right now that I would probably try to make more D, I like necks that are kind flat on the back, but still have some shoulders.

Any thoughts/experiences?

Thanks in advance!

jake
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 4003 neck reshape

Post by johnallg »

I know what you mean by bigger, my '04 is that way. It is the most stable neck of the 6 I have. You could take off some without too much compromise, but 1/16" I defer to Paul W to judge. Just make an 8-string out of it - the neck would be great for that. :lol:

As for the sticky, try cleaning the back of the neck with napth (lighter fluid) then putting on 2 or 3 coats of Zymol car polish. It will be nice and smooth.
User avatar
jingle_jangle
RRF Moderator
Posts: 22679
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
Contact:

Re: 4003 neck reshape

Post by jingle_jangle »

If you stick to a "D" shape, you'll be OK. It's when people go to a sharp "C" that they end up in trouble.

You can probably get up to .090" off the back with little difficulty. Taper the sides to meet it. Watch those edges--stick to the "D" profile and you'll be safe.

For a non-stick finish, you can do a matte nitro or conversion varnish on the back of the neck, It has a nice feel.
User avatar
legato
Junior Member
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Jul 26, 2006 6:09 am

Re: 4003 neck reshape

Post by legato »

Iv'e been thinking of doing the same to one of my basses. I have a friend that can x-ray it for me to see exactly how far the rods are from the back of the neck. But how close can i get to them is the $64.00 question.
I'll probably chicken out though. :(
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 4003 neck reshape

Post by jdogric12 »

Sell it and buy one from 76-85!
User avatar
gibsonlp
Technical Admin
Posts: 1734
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 10:40 pm
Contact:

Re: 4003 neck reshape

Post by gibsonlp »

jdogric12 wrote:Sell it and buy one from 76-85!
I thought that 71-72, 86 and 09 were slim, isn't it?
So long and thanks for all the fish!
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: 4003 neck reshape

Post by cassius987 »

@Gil: My 1976 4001FL has the skinniest neck I've ever played on a bass that wasn't one of those paper-thin Ibanez things.
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Re: 4003 neck reshape

Post by rickfan63 »

Over the years I've owned several Ric basses, and they have all been good. The '03 4003 had the biggest neck of all, and a killer tone. Yeah, it was a little bit on the chunky side, but it had real solid feel that I loved. I hate I had to sell it. It was a real beautiful bass. But financial matters forced my hand. I also sold my C64, but that didn't bother me. I wasn't anywhere near as fond of that bass as I was my V63 and 4003. Those 2 were mighty fine basses.
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: 4003 neck reshape

Post by jdogric12 »

Gil, those are especially thin, but any of the years I listed would be a vast improvement over an 03.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: 4003 neck reshape

Post by johnallg »

cassius987 wrote:@Gil: My 1976 4001FL has the skinniest neck I've ever played on a bass that wasn't one of those paper-thin Ibanez things.
My '75 is also my slimmest neck, very comfortable.
mad_phingers
New member
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 10:53 pm

Re: 4003 neck reshape

Post by mad_phingers »

Thanks for the advice, I may hold off. I have already taken some steel wool to the back of the neck to dull the finish a little, but it didn't really help the stickiness, I will try the Naptha.

I would feel pretty bad taking the finish completely off the neck as it is Montezuma Brown, but again, this bass has been through too much with me, I don't think I could ever sell it. Time to save up for an older Ric. Part of what sparked this was playing a '79 at a store the other day. Perfect neck thickness and awesome D shape, it felt great in my hand.
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: 4003 neck reshape

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

the thinnest neck is my '68. check the "girth" section for my specs. take your left hand and close your 4 fingers flat over the palm, resting your thumb on the side of the index finger...thats what the neck feels like with the strings. woods and boyer and noto have fondled this bass as well.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”