Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
Oh that is getting way too complicated for me. I'm just glad you guys know something about it.
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
I've never heard of this model, BTW mapleglo is natural, that looks more like two tone brown. 
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
Let's have a delete party!
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
Just as Rick archtops from the '40s are likely to be modified Harmony (or possibly Kay?) non-electric instruments, I believe this to be acoustic mandolin with Rick electronics and ID added. Looks like a Kay to me.
BTW, both Harmony and Kay also made electric mandos in the 1950s.
BTW, both Harmony and Kay also made electric mandos in the 1950s.
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
What does that mean?jdogric12 wrote:Let's have a delete party!
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
Just received the appraisal: Here's the description for it.
Rickenbacker Electro Vibrola model made circa 1936–37.
This instrument features a neck and body made in Chicago for Rickenbacker by Kay, with symmetrical A-style body shape, no sound holes, dot inlaid rosewood fingerboard, white binding on the edges of the fingerboard as well as top and back of the body, sunburst finish, typical Rickenbacker horseshoe-magnet pickup, one volume control, Kaufman vibrola tailpiece, and metal logo plate on the peghead reading Rickenbacher. This is an extremely rare instrument which would have appeal primarily to collectors, rather than to musicians wanting a practical utility tool.
Rickenbacker Electro Vibrola model made circa 1936–37.
This instrument features a neck and body made in Chicago for Rickenbacker by Kay, with symmetrical A-style body shape, no sound holes, dot inlaid rosewood fingerboard, white binding on the edges of the fingerboard as well as top and back of the body, sunburst finish, typical Rickenbacker horseshoe-magnet pickup, one volume control, Kaufman vibrola tailpiece, and metal logo plate on the peghead reading Rickenbacher. This is an extremely rare instrument which would have appeal primarily to collectors, rather than to musicians wanting a practical utility tool.
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
You guys really know, Kay made the body for Rickenbackerjingle_jangle wrote:Just as Rick archtops from the '40s are likely to be modified Harmony (or possibly Kay?) non-electric instruments, I believe this to be acoustic mandolin with Rick electronics and ID added. Looks like a Kay to me.
BTW, both Harmony and Kay also made electric mandos in the 1950s.
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
Someone deleted a PG-rated joke I made. Apparently only Disney level humor is allowed now. It had nothing to do with your mando, which, may I add, is quite awesome.Aynot108 wrote:What does that mean?jdogric12 wrote:Let's have a delete party!
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
I gotcha. Just wanted to check.
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
Who did the appraisal, Tonya?
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
PM me the joke. I'm dying to know!jdogric12 wrote:Someone deleted a PG-rated joke I made. Apparently only Disney level humor is allowed now. It had nothing to do with your mando, which, may I add, is quite awesome.Aynot108 wrote:What does that mean?jdogric12 wrote:Let's have a delete party!
- electrofaro
- Senior Member
- Posts: 3611
- Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
Me too, let's start a user groupIvanMunoz wrote:PM me the joke. I'm dying to know!
Would a Kay under its own brand be worth more, than the batch-clone Rickenbacker mandoline of the same year?
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
- jingle_jangle
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 22679
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 6:00 am
- Contact:
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
Not. I'd say the Bach (pre-Back!) is worth three or four times the Kay's value. The Kay acoustic is worth a couple of hundred bucks and these were made by the thousands. The Bach is a rarity!!!Wildberry wrote:Me too, let's start a user groupIvanMunoz wrote:PM me the joke. I'm dying to know!![]()
Would a Kay under its own brand be worth more, than the batch-clone Rickenbacker mandoline of the same year?
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
Bach does compose some nice peices!jingle_jangle wrote:Not. I'd say the Bach (pre-Back!) is worth three or four times the Kay's value. The Kay acoustic is worth a couple of hundred bucks and these were made by the thousands. The Bach is a rarity!!!Wildberry wrote:Me too, let's start a user groupIvanMunoz wrote:PM me the joke. I'm dying to know!![]()
Would a Kay under its own brand be worth more, than the batch-clone Rickenbacker mandoline of the same year?
Re: Rickenbacher Electro Mandolin
So did Vivaldi!
