325 vs 350

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
TheWonders
Junior Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 6:30 pm

325 vs 350

Post by TheWonders »

Is the body of a 350 the same size as the body of a 325?
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 325 vs 350

Post by collin »

Yep.
User avatar
TheWonders
Junior Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Sat May 26, 2007 6:30 pm

Re: 325 vs 350

Post by TheWonders »

Thanks.

I'd always assumed, since the 350 is full scale, that its body was larger.
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 325 vs 350

Post by collin »

tbplayer wrote:Thanks.

I'd always assumed, since the 350 is full scale, that its body was larger.

Nope, though it would be nice.....I think the 350 model is very disproportioned with a tiny body and long neck.

Then again, a full neck with a full body is what the 330-series guitars are.
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: 325 vs 350

Post by JakeK »

collin wrote:Nope, though it would be nice.....I think the 350 model is very disproportioned with a tiny body and long neck.
So this is disproportionate.

Had to do it. Not like we can ever get enough staring at Susanna or her Ric. :P
Attachments
262190_10150245738153781_39393223780_7185689_6635275_n.jpg
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: 325 vs 350

Post by collin »

Ms. Hoffs is well-proportioned indeed.....but her guitar is not.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”