I don't know.....it's red........The decoder says 1991.And Todd, your 370WB is a '92 (despite the mods, just trying to get my assumptions right)?
Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
Moderator: jingle_jangle
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
- paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6376
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
IIRC, the string spacing was designed to emulate George's from day one. 
There is no reason to ever be bored.
...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...
"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...
"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
Keep in mind the C63 has a 7.25" crown raduis fretboard. The others are 10". In my opinion this amkes a big difference in feel. I prefer the 7.25". True vintage Ricks were 7.25".
"The best things in life aren't things."
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
How does the rounder fretboard radius affect playability?
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
It is easier for chording. Plus theoretically it gives you a little more space. I'm sure it's mot much but I seem to be able to chord more cleanly on a C63 compared to a V64.Folkie wrote:How does the rounder fretboard radius affect playability?
"The best things in life aren't things."
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
I'm extrapolating from my knowledge of Fenders, so forgive me if I'm a little off-base here. Would the rounder radius mean that the guitar's action would be higher (My guess is no, since I won't be doing any real bending on a 12-string)?
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
JimK,
I read your recent post comparing your 2009 360/12 to Gary Clauson's 1989 370/12 RM, in which you said you noticed a difference in string-spacing. Could you elaborate a little on what you said?
Robert
I read your recent post comparing your 2009 360/12 to Gary Clauson's 1989 370/12 RM, in which you said you noticed a difference in string-spacing. Could you elaborate a little on what you said?
Robert
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
You answered your own question.Folkie wrote:I'm extrapolating from my knowledge of Fenders, so forgive me if I'm a little off-base here. Would the rounder radius mean that the guitar's action would be higher (My guess is no, since I won't be doing any real bending on a 12-string)?
"The best things in life aren't things."
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
Roger had nothing to do with the electric 12-string as he had left the company several years prior. F.C. Hall was not a musician IIRC.stsang wrote: I always wondered if Misters F.C.Hall or Roger Rossmeisl had small hands and that's why the guitars ended up with such narrow necks. I love the narrow necks. It feels strange to me when I play other guitars, for example the Gibson SG-12.
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
I had read on the Rickenbacker web page http://www.rickenbacker.com/history_modern.aspsloop_john_b wrote:Roger had nothing to do with the electric 12-string as he had left the company several years prior. F.C. Hall was not a musician IIRC.stsang wrote: I always wondered if Misters F.C.Hall or Roger Rossmeisl had small hands and that's why the guitars ended up with such narrow necks. I love the narrow necks. It feels strange to me when I play other guitars, for example the Gibson SG-12.
that Roger Rossmeisl designed the Capri series of guitars which had "slim and narrow 'fast action' necks". My understanding (possibly wrong) is that the 300 series guitars (both 6 and 12 strings) are descended directly from the Capri series designs. So, was Roger Rossmeisl indirectly responsible for the narrow necks on 300 series 12-strings?
2010 360/12c63 FG
2002 360/12 MG (mod with 7.4K scatterwound toasters, push/pull switch for 0.0047uF bridge cap)
2002 360/12 MG (mod with 7.4K scatterwound toasters, push/pull switch for 0.0047uF bridge cap)
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
I'm in a real quandary here. I can't afford a new 360/12C63 at the moment. I'd like to have the octave pairs on my 2010 360/12 spaced wider, but I'm not sure there's anyone local who has the expertise to do the job. My plan is to order up a 12-saddle bridge and have my nut replaced. I'll have to do some precise measurements of my 1991 330/12 to make sure the string-spacing on the 360 is just right.
The real question is, whom do I trust to do this mod? I bought the guitar from Chris Clayton at POTR, and his setup was spot on. But is there someone else, Jingle-Jangle perhaps, who might have more experience modifying nuts and installing 12-saddle bridges?
Robert
The real question is, whom do I trust to do this mod? I bought the guitar from Chris Clayton at POTR, and his setup was spot on. But is there someone else, Jingle-Jangle perhaps, who might have more experience modifying nuts and installing 12-saddle bridges?
Robert
Last edited by Folkie on Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
if Chris is closer to you, take it to him, and maybe ask him for advice on your guitar's nut problem.Folkie wrote:The real question is, whom do I trust to do this mod? I bought the guitar from Chris Clayton at POTR, and his setup was spot on. But people here rave about Jingle-Jangle's work, and he might have more experience modifying nuts and installing 12-saddle bridges. Can anyone give me some words of advice?
Robert
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
Thanks, Jake. I live in Ohio, and Chris is in New Jersey. I spoke to him today about replacement bridge screws, but not yet on the subject of the mod I'm considering. I didn't mean to question his knowledge; he clearly is an expert when it comes to all things Rickenbacker.
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
Sorry to hear you're not 100% happy with your Ric. I didn't buy my Ric from Chris (he's the wrong side of New Jersey from me) but I've ordered several parts from him and he seems to be a good guy and extremely knowledgeable. Who knows - he may even offer exchange terms if your heart is really set on a Rick 360/12C63 (and he has one in stock)? Let us know how it goes!Folkie wrote:Thanks, Jake. I live in Ohio, and Chris is in New Jersey. I spoke to him today about replacement bridge screws, but not yet on the subject of the mod I'm considering. I didn't mean to question his knowledge; he clearly is an expert when it comes to all things Rickenbacker.
2010 360/12c63 FG
2002 360/12 MG (mod with 7.4K scatterwound toasters, push/pull switch for 0.0047uF bridge cap)
2002 360/12 MG (mod with 7.4K scatterwound toasters, push/pull switch for 0.0047uF bridge cap)
Re: Tighter String-Spacing Pros and Cons
I've been away for a couple of days. Anyhow......I don't think I noticed much of a difference in the feel of Gary Clauson's McGuinn LE and my '09 360/12. The detail that was immediately apparent was the closer string spacing of the courses. I didn't really spend that much time with Gary's guitar and so couldn't put it through its paces, so to speak. Bear in mind though, that I'm used to smallish instruments; banjo, fiddle, mandolin, and have overheard observations that I have long, skinny fingers. So I don't think I'm really much help here. All I can say is my '09 works for me, and I've no doubt that if it were a late '80s McGuinn LE, that I could get along just fine.JakeK wrote:Paging Jim Krause: I think your thoughts on your baby 360/12 from '09 vs Gary Clauson's Roger McGuinn LE from '89 would be appreciated!![]()
![]()
JimK
