The Signature bass (that never was)

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by johnallg »

jps wrote:Over or under?
Under and thus blurry. Can't correct for blurry.... With flashing stage lights, I just timed taking my shot wrong. :cry:
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by jps »

Too bad about the blurry, however, an underexposed slide may contain enough information to produce a decent print. It is overexposed slides that lose information in the highlights that can not be recovered.
Ivan3000
Advanced Member
Posts: 2392
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by Ivan3000 »

Ivan Munoz signature bass! That could be wild cool!
User avatar
watton_earth
New member
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 4:43 pm

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by watton_earth »

The stone roses are back togther yeah! Mani signature bass please..
I want to be a door too...
User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by wim »

I'm going to change my last name to Rickenbacker.
I will have A LOT of signature models then :lol:
Ivan3000
Advanced Member
Posts: 2392
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by Ivan3000 »

Genious!
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by paologregorio »

watton_earth wrote:The stone roses are back togther yeah! Mani signature bass please..
Um, you know what Mr. Hall has to say about the resemblance of the top horn on the 4005 to a.. . ! Not going to happen! :lol:
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
User avatar
Mr.Fingers
New member
Posts: 26
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:56 am
Contact:

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by Mr.Fingers »

Image

Roger Glover's Rick 4001. With FW inlays and CB binding, 2 jazz-pickups (reverse poled, wired as a humbucker), and a Gibson minibucker underneath the bridgecover.
"Work is for people who can't play video games"

'72 4001 MG (ex-Fireglo, now FUBAR)
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

johnallg wrote:
jps wrote:
pag wrote:...I saw Chris use his eight string on the Topographic Oceans tour through to the Going For the One tour.
Some of the live recordings of "Roundabout" encores from this period have the eight string high in the mix.
I've seen Chris play his during the Relayer era when I saw Yes a few times. 8)
I have a couple badly exposed slides of him playing it in the Zoo.

i saw chris playing the 4008 on the 4th night of the tormato tour in '78 for going for the one and roundabout in providence,RI.
User avatar
rikk
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1414
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 3:04 pm

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by rikk »

Mr.Fingers wrote:Image

Roger Glover's Rick 4001. With FW inlays and CB binding, 2 jazz-pickups (reverse poled, wired as a humbucker), and a Gibson minibucker underneath the bridgecover.

That bass looks much different today. He stills brings it out every once in a while. There are threads on here about the restoration of this bass
User avatar
simer4001
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 4288
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2000 8:14 pm

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by simer4001 »

JakeK wrote:Paul McCartney (although he never had his actual signature anywhere on the bass) had a signature model, the 4001C64. The flipped head was a trademark of his left-handed 4001S bass, and so Ric decided to offer right handers a taste of what Paul had. There was also a small run of left hand 4001V63's to Japan (they get everything!) with right-handed necks called 4001PMC, again, it did not bear McCartney's signature.

What I'm trying to say is, Paul had a signature model, too, but the 4001PMC, 4001C64 and 4001C64S beared his signature nowhere.
Here is a 4001V63PMC that I purchased right here in America
Attachments
Guitars 001.jpg
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by johnallg »

Brian, RIHS or magnetic shoes?
Ivan3000
Advanced Member
Posts: 2392
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by Ivan3000 »

Apparently the Super early V63's had the magnetic shoes on them.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by johnallg »

IvanMunoz wrote:Apparently the Super early V63's had the magnetic shoes on them.
But this was a special model - very few made. I'm not sure of the time frame this bass was made. [edit] the 3 PMCs in the registry were 1999 so I'm guessing they have RIHS pups.
Ivan3000
Advanced Member
Posts: 2392
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: The Signature bass (that never was)

Post by Ivan3000 »

johnallg wrote:
IvanMunoz wrote:Apparently the Super early V63's had the magnetic shoes on them.
But this was a special model - very few made. I'm not sure of the time frame this bass was made. [edit] the 3 PMCs in the registry were 1999 so I'm guessing they have RIHS pups.
I'd love to own one of them.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”