A little stumped here.

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by jps »

BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:surround seems too roundish on the corners for that period.
I noticed that too, but then, my standard these days is this one.
4001_800_3929.jpg
MG_4001_small_3940.jpg
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by godber »

That's very pretty Jeff.
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by ram »

What month in '74? Maybe an early bass got the leftover?
The only thing we can perceive are our perceptions - George Berkeley
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by sloop_john_b »

s4001 wrote:Are you acquiring this one?
Scott, no, a friend contacted me about trying to sell his bass and asked me to help him verify what it is and what it's worth.

The guy my friend bought it from owned it for about 12 years and it sat un-played and un-modded. So he bought it circa 1999, before there was Pickguardian or any other accurate pickguards for that matter. Of course, the plastic parts still could have been replaced. BUT, the pickguard is a perfect fit (all holes line up and there are no extras, plus its very old) and it's not like black plexi TRCs grow on trees! My gut is telling me that they are original here.

Jeff, can you post that photo that shows the progression of bass tailpieces? I want to verify which one this is. I have a pic of the underside.

This bass is from May of 1974 based on serial number verified by pot codes.

BTW, this bass sounds massive (can't BELIEVE the neck pickup!) and plays beautifully too.
User avatar
nov_1981
Member
Posts: 251
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2007 5:02 pm

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by nov_1981 »

I remembered a post about a 74 with CB.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=391540&hilit=1974+4 ... rd+binding
Unfortunately the links for the pics dont work anymore :(
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by jps »

sloop_john_b wrote:Jeff, can you post that photo that shows the progression of bass tailpieces? I want to verify which one this is. I have a pic of the underside.
I am not on my computer at the moment so I do not have the photo handy; I know that John Allgaier, and about 100 others on the RRF have it, too :mrgreen: so perhaps one of them can do so. I will not be able to do so, myself, until tomorrow evening. :(
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by ilan »

Jetglo, checkerboard, black guards? I think this one qualifies as the earliest Shadow prototype!
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by ken_j »

jps wrote:
sloop_john_b wrote:Jeff, can you post that photo that shows the progression of bass tailpieces? I want to verify which one this is. I have a pic of the underside.
I am not on my computer at the moment so I do not have the photo handy; I know that John Allgaier, and about 100 others on the RRF have it, too :mrgreen: so perhaps one of them can do so. I will not be able to do so, myself, until tomorrow evening. :(
Tailpieces_Front_small_3980.jpg
Tailpieces_Bottom_small_3981.jpg
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by sloop_john_b »

Thanks Ken. The tailpiece on this bass is the one on the left. That's a good thing innit? :D
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

ken will have to expand that pic to include the 7 screw, yes ?
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by jps »

BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:ken will have to expand that pic to include the 7 screw, yes ?
Those were all the varieties I had available to me when I made that photograph. Thanks for posting them, Ken. 8)
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

well jeff ! watruwaytingfer ! get collecting some more variants. :lol:
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by jps »

Got some, Ron? 8)
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

....nope... :(
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: A little stumped here.

Post by sloop_john_b »

The gap-tooth on the left, during what years did they use that? Ended in '72 right?
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”