jdogric12 wrote:jps wrote:Speaking of J Dog, anyone see the back cover of the July '11 issue of Bass Player?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Nope. What did we miss??
Not quite an S
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: Not quite an S
Re: Not quite an S
Nice cat, my chinchilla got to my hofner and put a little scratch in the back a while back, im sure your cat is tame thoughjdogric12 wrote:no bass? put this in your pipe and smoke it!
Re: Not quite an S
Love the HS & toaster Jdog... and "S" is beSt in my book. 
Re: Not quite an S
Well I've finally got it back and complete! Big thanks to Ken Joseph, who custom made a metal piece to use as a truss rod spacer. Since the rods adjust at the body, and are spread much farther apart than headstock-adjusting ones, a custom piece was needed, since replacements from this transitional period are nearly impossible to come by. I've got it wired up as a 4001v63 would be, with toaster, horsie, and mono output. This thing clanks way better than any Rick bass I've ever owned.
Re: Not quite an S
Thats nice! Do you ever plan on having the fretboard replaced to make it "Quite the S"?
Re: Not quite an S
The bass looks great, Jason.
If you go with Ivan's suggestion make it a fretless bass with no dots on the fingerboard.
The HS pickup looks perfect, now get out that router/drill/chisel/hammer/whatever and move that toaster pickup to it's proper location! 
- paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6376
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Not quite an S
It's the opposite, trim-wise, of the 1993. 
Your bass has standard features on the body, and deluxe features on the neck, whilst the 1993 has deluxe features on the body and standard features on the neck.
Your bass has standard features on the body, and deluxe features on the neck, whilst the 1993 has deluxe features on the body and standard features on the neck.
There is no reason to ever be bored.
...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...
"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...
"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
Re: Not quite an S
Fretted!jps wrote:The bass looks great, Jason.If you go with Ivan's suggestion make it a fretless bass with no dots on the fingerboard.
The HS pickup looks perfect, now get out that router/drill/chisel/hammer/whatever and move that toaster pickup to it's proper location!
Re: Not quite an S
That could work as well!ken_j wrote:Just play it.
- rickenbrother
- RRF Moderator
- Posts: 13218
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am
Re: Not quite an S
Well it's different, but cool having the triangle inlays with the S body. Enjoy it, Jdog!
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! 
Re: Not quite an S
Nice bass, Jdog. I'm with Ivan, what'dya gonna do about that fretboard?
Very interesting and different look all the same
Yep.paologregorio wrote:Your bass has standard features on the body, and deluxe features on the neck, whilst the 1993 has deluxe features on the body and standard features on the neck.
Re: Not quite an S
Lovely!JakeK wrote:Nice bass, Jdog. I'm with Ivan, what'dya gonna do about that fretboard?Very interesting and different look all the same
Yep.paologregorio wrote:Your bass has standard features on the body, and deluxe features on the neck, whilst the 1993 has deluxe features on the body and standard features on the neck.
-
SquireFan91
- New member
- Posts: 60
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 1:57 pm
- Contact:
Re: Not quite an S
Stunning bass and wonderful mod. I've always preferred the S body. I also prefer dots to triangles, but I LOVE the bound neck on the unbound body. Anyway, it looks awesome. I'd love to know how it sounds.
Bass guitarist, flautist, guitarist, and vocalist
amalgameffect.bandcamp.com
Rickenbacker 4003S Bass
PRS SE Santana (w/piezo) Electric Guitar
Taylor GC3 Acoustic Guitar
Powell Silhouette Flute
amalgameffect.bandcamp.com
Rickenbacker 4003S Bass
PRS SE Santana (w/piezo) Electric Guitar
Taylor GC3 Acoustic Guitar
Powell Silhouette Flute
