Heavy strings on a ric

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

HydrasBreath
Junior Member
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:42 am

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by HydrasBreath »

nice looking basses guys! How does a toaster sound in the bridge position? I have a toaster in the neck on my 4001 and it has a bit of a "smooth" and "hollow" quality to it. Is it somewhat similar in the bridge position?
1978 "Unionjackglo" 4001
2010 Jetglo 4003
2011 Fireglo 4003
Ampeg SVT-VR
Ampeg 810AV
Orange AD200B Mk III
Orange OBC115
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by cassius987 »

HydrasBreath wrote:nice looking basses guys! How does a toaster sound in the bridge position? I have a toaster in the neck on my 4001 and it has a bit of a "smooth" and "hollow" quality to it. Is it somewhat similar in the bridge position?
Not really hollow at all. You've got to remember pickup POSITION is at least as important if not a good deal more than pickup type in terms of the sound you'll get. The bridge position tends to have a harmonically rich sound that borders on a little burpy (doesn't hold a candle to a Fender Jazz in this regard though). With a Toaster in there you'll get a smoother, cleaner version of what a Hi-Gain would produce but it will still sound like a bridge pickup.

I recorded these tracks simultaneously using Ric-O-Sound into two mono channels so it's the exact same pickups and playing, but the positions are different.

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_so ... ID=8091201
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_so ... ID=8091200
HydrasBreath
Junior Member
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:42 am

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by HydrasBreath »

cassius987 wrote:
HydrasBreath wrote:nice looking basses guys! How does a toaster sound in the bridge position? I have a toaster in the neck on my 4001 and it has a bit of a "smooth" and "hollow" quality to it. Is it somewhat similar in the bridge position?
Not really hollow at all. You've got to remember pickup POSITION is at least as important if not a good deal more than pickup type in terms of the sound you'll get. The bridge position tends to have a harmonically rich sound that borders on a little burpy (doesn't hold a candle to a Fender Jazz in this regard though). With a Toaster in there you'll get a smoother, cleaner version of what a Hi-Gain would produce but it will still sound like a bridge pickup.

I recorded these tracks simultaneously using Ric-O-Sound into two mono channels so it's the exact same pickups and playing, but the positions are different.

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_so ... ID=8091201
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_so ... ID=8091200
thanks for the soundclips that bass sounds just as good as it looks! It's a sweet machine with lots of vintage vibe.

And I didn't mean hollow as in lacking tone or anything...just to me toasters seem a bit more scooped in the mids. But maybe that's just because they don't have as much bite as hi-gains since they aren't wound as much. I plan on adding 2 more Rics to my arsenal and double-toasterizing one of them sounds like an interesting prospect.
1978 "Unionjackglo" 4001
2010 Jetglo 4003
2011 Fireglo 4003
Ampeg SVT-VR
Ampeg 810AV
Orange AD200B Mk III
Orange OBC115
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by rickfan63 »

BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:i used to use 50-110 on my ricks but cause we tuned down a semi tone and that kept the same string tension as the 45-105. i would not recommend 50-110 for a-440 standard tuning on a rick for structural reasons.

+1. I was always afraid to put really heavy strings on my Ricks for that reason.
rickfan63
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 896
Joined: Fri Nov 01, 2002 8:30 am

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by rickfan63 »

BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:i used to use 50-110 on my ricks but cause we tuned down a semi tone and that kept the same string tension as the 45-105. i would not recommend 50-110 for a-440 standard tuning on a rick for structural reasons.

+1. I was always afraid to put really heavy strings on my Ricks for that reason.
User avatar
coolingitdown
Intermediate Member
Posts: 595
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:47 am

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by coolingitdown »

So there IS an echo in here! :lol:
2010 4003 FG
1997 4003FL Turquoise
Set neck 4001S (color TBD)
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by cassius987 »

HydrasBreath wrote:=And I didn't mean hollow as in lacking tone or anything...just to me toasters seem a bit more scooped in the mids. But maybe that's just because they don't have as much bite as hi-gains since they aren't wound as much. I plan on adding 2 more Rics to my arsenal and double-toasterizing one of them sounds like an interesting prospect.
I would say modern Hi-Gains have a mid-range bump and Toasters are more flat (but would sound scooped by comparison to a Hi-Gain). If you really want to have fun with two Toasters, you can have Lindy Fralin remagnetize one of them so they hum-cancel when they're both on, like a Fender Jazz. It cost me $20, which I thought wasn't too bad. Works great.
STOKKIs
New member
Posts: 7
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 6:32 pm

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by STOKKIs »

Just want to give you guys an update - Ive had the bass for about one week now - stringed it with rotosounds 45-105 flats and gave it a setup when it arrived. Its a stellar bass with great performance - neck seems stable so far. Ill take it to rehersal tomorrow for some real action. Funny thing - now i want one in jetglo!
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by cjj »

STOKKIs wrote: Funny thing - now i want one in jetglo!
And the RAS begins... :twisted:
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13211
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by rickenbrother »

coolingitdown wrote:
rickenbrother wrote: The 4003S/5 and 4003S/8 have the same neck as the 4003S, so your 4003S should be able to take the tension. It would just have to be set up right.
aceonbass wrote:Also remember that the later design 4003's with the truss rod adjustment at the headstocks had the same necks as 4003S5's & S8's, which must have been able to take nearly 300lbs of string tension.
Is there an echo in here? :lol: 8)
Well, we'll look at at it as back up or reinforcement of knowledge. :wink:
coolingitdown wrote:So there IS an echo in here! :lol:
Let's see...
Hello?




Hello?

Yep! :lol: :mrgreen:
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
HydrasBreath
Junior Member
Posts: 135
Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 11:42 am

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by HydrasBreath »

cassius987 wrote:
HydrasBreath wrote:=And I didn't mean hollow as in lacking tone or anything...just to me toasters seem a bit more scooped in the mids. But maybe that's just because they don't have as much bite as hi-gains since they aren't wound as much. I plan on adding 2 more Rics to my arsenal and double-toasterizing one of them sounds like an interesting prospect.
I would say modern Hi-Gains have a mid-range bump and Toasters are more flat (but would sound scooped by comparison to a Hi-Gain). If you really want to have fun with two Toasters, you can have Lindy Fralin remagnetize one of them so they hum-cancel when they're both on, like a Fender Jazz. It cost me $20, which I thought wasn't too bad. Works great.
nice! I'll definitely keep that in mind.
1978 "Unionjackglo" 4001
2010 Jetglo 4003
2011 Fireglo 4003
Ampeg SVT-VR
Ampeg 810AV
Orange AD200B Mk III
Orange OBC115
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37499
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by jps »

STOKKIs wrote:Funny thing - now i want one in jetglo!
What's so funny about that, that is a perfectly normal response! :mrgreen:
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by johnallg »

cassius987 wrote:
HydrasBreath wrote:=And I didn't mean hollow as in lacking tone or anything...just to me toasters seem a bit more scooped in the mids. But maybe that's just because they don't have as much bite as hi-gains since they aren't wound as much. I plan on adding 2 more Rics to my arsenal and double-toasterizing one of them sounds like an interesting prospect.
I would say modern Hi-Gains have a mid-range bump and Toasters are more flat (but would sound scooped by comparison to a Hi-Gain). If you really want to have fun with two Toasters, you can have Lindy Fralin remagnetize one of them so they hum-cancel when they're both on, like a Fender Jazz. It cost me $20, which I thought wasn't too bad. Works great.
Or just pull out the magnetic rods and flip them over and reinsert.....
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by cassius987 »

johnallg wrote:Or just pull out the magnetic rods and flip them over and reinsert.....
I tried that repeatedly with no success before contacting Fralin's people.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: Heavy strings on a ric

Post by johnallg »

cassius987 wrote:
johnallg wrote:Or just pull out the magnetic rods and flip them over and reinsert.....
I tried that repeatedly with no success before contacting Fralin's people.
Yeah, they're glued in there pretty good.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”