sloop_john_b wrote:Aww. He's not jaded yet.
YUP.
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
sloop_john_b wrote:Aww. He's not jaded yet.
Indeed, this is very true.rickenbrother wrote:
Nobody is twisting the arms of the jaded crowd into buying a new Rickenbacker. You guys usually buy vintage anyway.

Those were really nice...now only if I were a bass player!jps wrote:You had your chance with those 5 white 4001C64 basses that POTR had recently.rkbsound wrote:I thought that white-on-white might make an appearance. I'm glad it didn't, because I'd be out a couple of grand! Not to mention having to explain "what's in the box?" to my wife.
Right now the vintage market is the way to go, depending on which Rickenbacker model and year. If you are into the vintage thing, you could pick up a mid 60's player for not much more than a new one. Indeed, there are plenty of vintage Ricks that cost less than a new one. I'm not downplaying new Rick's, of course, just commenting on current prices based on today's guitar economy. I'm sure I'll be a buyer of a new one again at some point!collin wrote:Indeed, this is very true.rickenbrother wrote:
Nobody is twisting the arms of the jaded crowd into buying a new Rickenbacker. You guys usually buy vintage anyway.
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:i thought paul "blueman" w. was the RIC custom shop !![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Oh my gosh... died laughing.Casiraghi22 wrote:please John hear our prayers. Amen.
No wanting to start an argument here, but... to me they didn't... anything is possible if you really want it, imo!chucksimms wrote:I know, Mr. Hall has addressed the myriad of reasons why it's not feasible (all of which make perfect sense)