Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

chucksimms
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 1:16 pm

Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by chucksimms »

It's been mooted a few times on the board recently and has me wondering: how many have vintage pieces do folks have in their collection, and to what ratio? I've had a fair number of Ricks over the years (25 or more, probably) a mix of bass, six and 12 string. I find my current collection is all vintage except for my 4001C64 bass, which is a ratio of 4:1.
What do you have, and what (if any) rationale guides your acquisitions?
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by bassduke49 »

You may have to define "vintage" -- something from before a certain date? What date? Is a 1959 4000 MORE vintage than a 1965 4005? I've got two basses from the '70s, two from the '80s, a couple from the '90s, and the rest from the oughts. Where would YOU draw the vintage line?
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by sloop_john_b »

Vintage 6'er ('68), vintage lap steel ('46), newer bass ('99).
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by jps »

sloop_john_b wrote:...newer bass ('99).
How old will you be when your '99 bass becomes vintage? :wink:
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by jps »

Vintage is a very interesting concept. When I bought my former Feb. '67 4005WB in 1973 it was just a sort of old, used bass; at what point in time did it become a vintage bass? :shock:
chucksimms
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 604
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2001 1:16 pm

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by chucksimms »

For me I'd say '73 is the cutoff for what I consider vintage Ricks as they began to eliminate many of the '60s features such as crushed pearl inlay, checkerboard binding, toasters and (for guitars) 21 frets and the smaller headstock. I know, there's always exceptions out there with rarities and limited items such as the 4002. But yeah, pre '73.
User avatar
rickyfricky
Intermediate Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by rickyfricky »

'76, '77, '84, '85.

'93, '97, '00, '04, '05.

'09, '10, '11.

'12 on order. :D
Last edited by rickyfricky on Sun Jan 29, 2012 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Watch those teeth, Marlin. I'm not sure we've properly sedated the beast . . .
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4886
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by 8mileshigher »

bassduke49 wrote:You may have to define "vintage" -- something from before a certain date? What date?
The Vintage Rickenbackers thread here on the RRF defines Vintage as '54 through '84 year models.
Does anyone know what criteria made '84 the transition year ?

My collection has three oughts, two nineties, one eighties, one seventies plus a console steel circa '61.
"What we've got is Blind Faith in each other" Steve Winwood, Newsweek July 28 1969

10 4003 FG
06 WB BRG
04 660-12 JG
03 360-12 FG
99 V64 six FG
96 650-A TQ
94 V64-12 JG
81 370-WB JG
73 480 DaphBlue
61 Cons Steel MG
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by sloop_john_b »

jps wrote:
sloop_john_b wrote:...newer bass ('99).
How old will you be when your '99 bass becomes vintage? :wink:
It became vintage when Dale was done with it...bum neck and all! :lol:
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by sloop_john_b »

8mileshigher wrote:The Vintage Rickenbackers thread here on the RRF defines Vintage as '54 through '84 year models.
Does anyone know what criteria made '84 the transition year ?
Yes, '84 was when John Hall took over the company. I look at that as the cutoff for vintage when it comes to Ricks.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13212
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by rickenbrother »

I have both vintage and current production models.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
collin
Senior Member
Posts: 6992
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 6:28 pm

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by collin »

chucksimms wrote:For me I'd say '73 is the cutoff for what I consider vintage Ricks as they began to eliminate many of the '60s features such as crushed pearl inlay, checkerboard binding, toasters and (for guitars) 21 frets and the smaller headstock. I know, there's always exceptions out there with rarities and limited items such as the 4002. But yeah, pre '73.

I agree 110%

Not that the late 70s/early 80s Rics and the modern JH-era Rics aren't great--they definitely are, but the fact is all the production changes after mid-73 marked the end of an era, moving away from all the features we've come to love the most and reintroduce over the years in reissues.

I'd even argue that the best years were pre-1966. :wink:

The unique thing about Rics is that the golden "vintage" era ends only due to a change in features, not a marked drop in production quality, unlike pretty much every single other American guitar manufacturer by the early 1970s.

It's hard to use the word "vintage" in the context of rating guitars. That's just become a blanket term for an arbitrary date. Its much better to define the "golden years" of any manufacturer, which, in many cases doesn't begin until many years after they begin making guitars.

Here's my general idea of the perceived "golden years" of most of the bigger American electric guitar manufacturers from back in the day:

-Gibson 1952-1964
-Gretsch 1954-1965
-Fender 1950-1966
-Rickenbacker 1957-1965
-Epiphone 1957-1969


All that said, I have three pre-1973 Rics and zero post-1973 Rics. :D
Last edited by collin on Sun Jan 29, 2012 10:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by jps »

collin wrote:
chucksimms wrote:For me I'd say '73 is the cutoff for what I consider vintage Ricks as they began to eliminate many of the '60s features such as crushed pearl inlay, checkerboard binding, toasters and (for guitars) 21 frets and the smaller headstock. I know, there's always exceptions out there with rarities and limited items such as the 4002. But yeah, pre '73.

I agree 110%

...I have three pre-1973 Rics and zero post-1973 Rics. :D
You're not biased! :lol:
User avatar
Danotron
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1423
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:07 pm

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by Danotron »

I'm in for 10 vintage ('73 or earlier) and 5 modern ones.

I Found it interesting when I looked at my list too. Of the 5 "newer" ones 2 are Artist models based on Vintage guitars (a Carl Wilson 12 and John Kay model), and the other 3 have been modified to more Vintage appointments (Paul W. Lightshow, Paul W. crushed pearl inlays on a AFG 620, and a Larry Davis modified 1997).

I guess that puts me pretty firmly in the Vintage camp :)

(Although I am digging the pictures of this new Ruby color from NAMM) 8)
egosheep
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Vintage vs. Current Production: Your Collection?

Post by egosheep »

I only have one Ric, it's an '83 330. If I'm lucky enough to own another, I'd like it to be pre 73.
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”