Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Modern years of Rickenbacker Guitars from 1984 to the present

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
pocaloc
Junior Member
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:42 pm

Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by pocaloc »

I was just curious if there is some reason that 1984 is the last year that is considered vintage. I understand that eventually a 1995 will be considered vintage as the years go buy, but I just wondered if there is another reason, other than you have to cut if off somewhere. Over on the offset.com forum, 1980 is the cutoff for what is considered vintage. I'm just curious if there was something that changed about the process of making Rickenbacker's in 1985?
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by sloop_john_b »

pocaloc wrote:I was just curious if there is some reason that 1984 is the last year that is considered vintage. I understand that eventually a 1995 will be considered vintage as the years go buy, but I just wondered if there is another reason, other than you have to cut if off somewhere. Over on the offset.com forum, 1980 is the cutoff for what is considered vintage. I'm just curious if there was something that changed about the process of making Rickenbacker's in 1985?
In 1984 John Hall (current CEO) took over the company from his father Francis (F.C.) Hall. The result of this was the introduction of new models, finishes, and trim options, the discontinuation of others, and a general modernization of the factory, production process, image, and marketing.
User avatar
pocaloc
Junior Member
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2010 7:42 pm

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by pocaloc »

Oh, thanks a lot for the information.
User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by wim »

sloop_john_b wrote:
pocaloc wrote:I was just curious if there is some reason that 1984 is the last year that is considered vintage. I understand that eventually a 1995 will be considered vintage as the years go buy, but I just wondered if there is another reason, other than you have to cut if off somewhere. Over on the offset.com forum, 1980 is the cutoff for what is considered vintage. I'm just curious if there was something that changed about the process of making Rickenbacker's in 1985?
In 1984 John Hall (current CEO) took over the company from his father Francis (F.C.) Hall. The result of this was the introduction of new models, finishes, and trim options, the discontinuation of others, and a general modernization of the factory, production process, image, and marketing.

Almost sounds like a pre-John Hall period.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by sloop_john_b »

IMO there is a quite noticeable change between, say, a 1983 330 and a 1986 330, whereas my 1968 330 doesn't feel very far off from my old 1983 330. I wouldn't go so far as to compare it to pre and post-CBS/Norlin as I don't think there is a quality difference, but there is certainly a difference.
User avatar
chefothefuture
Advanced Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by chefothefuture »

A big difference in the hollowbodies was the discontinuation of the X-Bracing. I thought this was right around then.
The re-design of the truss rods also happened at this time.

Ironically, the first Ricks I played with both new features were a 4001V63 and a 360/12V64(3? I'll be beaten with a Maxima for forgetting that LOL!)
This was in January of '85.
egosheep
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by egosheep »

chefothefuture wrote:A big difference in the hollowbodies was the discontinuation of the X-Bracing. I thought this was right around then.
The re-design of the truss rods also happened at this time.
Specifically, in the early 80's the top's got thicker but the X-brace remained, then after '84 the top got even thicker to compensate and the X-brace was eliminated on standard models. An 83 or 84 with the thicker top and the X brace has a really cool sound!

There were also small headstocks and very slim necks, in general. Nice ramps as well. The early 80's also a period of iconic Hi-Gain sounds... Johnny Marr, Peter Buck, Paul Weller etc. It's a very nicely balance pickup, with a lower output than later hi-gains. These guitars also had the vintage style electronics with the tone cap inline with the bridge pickup.

Another thing to note is that the early to mid 80's were some of the worst years in company history in terms of sales. Not very many guitars were made. I have friend who called the factory in 1983 and I think they shipped his guitar in 2-3 weeks. So I like to think that maybe some of the guitars got a little more love in the woodshop... who knows. :)
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by paologregorio »

I special-ordered a Rick 360 WB in Azure-Glo Blue towards the end of `84, with the new "vintage chrome bar pickups" and it arrived in about five months or less. :D

It is X-braced, and has the thicker top. Cool guitar. :)
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
egosheep
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1258
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:29 pm
Contact:

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by egosheep »

paologregorio wrote:I special-ordered a Rick 360 WB in Azure-Glo Blue towards the end of `84, with the new "vintage chrome bar pickups" and it arrived in about five months or less. :D

It is X-braced, and has the thicker top. Cool guitar. :)
Awesome Paul... post a photo!
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
User avatar
johnnysain
Member
Posts: 467
Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:00 am

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by johnnysain »

sloop_john_b wrote:
In 1984 John Hall (current CEO) took over the company from his father Francis (F.C.) Hall. The result of this was the introduction of new models, finishes, and trim options, the discontinuation of others, and a general modernization of the factory, production process, image, and marketing.
Therefore, the year 1984 ushered in the era known as the 'CBS years'.....(Changes By Son).
Rickenbacker player since 1978
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6374
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by paologregorio »

egosheep wrote:
paologregorio wrote:I special-ordered a Rick 360 WB in Azure-Glo Blue towards the end of `84, with the new "vintage chrome bar pickups" and it arrived in about five months or less. :D

It is X-braced, and has the thicker top. Cool guitar. :)
Awesome Paul... post a photo!
Here you go:
Nov 84 AZ Blue 365 WB.jpg
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by JakeK »

paologregorio wrote:Here you go:
Nov 84 AZ Blue 365 WB.jpg
I've seen and heard that guitar...definitely a good one! :D
User avatar
manta
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1338
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?

Post by manta »

Could be BC and AC (Before CEO... After CEO). :D
Manta (Tim Rock)
http://www.mantaraymusic.com
1993 Plus FG, 730L-12, 4001FL, Danelectro 6/12, Storyboard Strat
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: Modern Years - After 1983”