Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
I was just curious if there is some reason that 1984 is the last year that is considered vintage. I understand that eventually a 1995 will be considered vintage as the years go buy, but I just wondered if there is another reason, other than you have to cut if off somewhere. Over on the offset.com forum, 1980 is the cutoff for what is considered vintage. I'm just curious if there was something that changed about the process of making Rickenbacker's in 1985?
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
In 1984 John Hall (current CEO) took over the company from his father Francis (F.C.) Hall. The result of this was the introduction of new models, finishes, and trim options, the discontinuation of others, and a general modernization of the factory, production process, image, and marketing.pocaloc wrote:I was just curious if there is some reason that 1984 is the last year that is considered vintage. I understand that eventually a 1995 will be considered vintage as the years go buy, but I just wondered if there is another reason, other than you have to cut if off somewhere. Over on the offset.com forum, 1980 is the cutoff for what is considered vintage. I'm just curious if there was something that changed about the process of making Rickenbacker's in 1985?
Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
Oh, thanks a lot for the information.
Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
sloop_john_b wrote:In 1984 John Hall (current CEO) took over the company from his father Francis (F.C.) Hall. The result of this was the introduction of new models, finishes, and trim options, the discontinuation of others, and a general modernization of the factory, production process, image, and marketing.pocaloc wrote:I was just curious if there is some reason that 1984 is the last year that is considered vintage. I understand that eventually a 1995 will be considered vintage as the years go buy, but I just wondered if there is another reason, other than you have to cut if off somewhere. Over on the offset.com forum, 1980 is the cutoff for what is considered vintage. I'm just curious if there was something that changed about the process of making Rickenbacker's in 1985?
Almost sounds like a pre-John Hall period.
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
IMO there is a quite noticeable change between, say, a 1983 330 and a 1986 330, whereas my 1968 330 doesn't feel very far off from my old 1983 330. I wouldn't go so far as to compare it to pre and post-CBS/Norlin as I don't think there is a quality difference, but there is certainly a difference.
- chefothefuture
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 1886
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am
Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
A big difference in the hollowbodies was the discontinuation of the X-Bracing. I thought this was right around then.
The re-design of the truss rods also happened at this time.
Ironically, the first Ricks I played with both new features were a 4001V63 and a 360/12V64(3? I'll be beaten with a Maxima for forgetting that LOL!)
This was in January of '85.
The re-design of the truss rods also happened at this time.
Ironically, the first Ricks I played with both new features were a 4001V63 and a 360/12V64(3? I'll be beaten with a Maxima for forgetting that LOL!)
This was in January of '85.
Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
Specifically, in the early 80's the top's got thicker but the X-brace remained, then after '84 the top got even thicker to compensate and the X-brace was eliminated on standard models. An 83 or 84 with the thicker top and the X brace has a really cool sound!chefothefuture wrote:A big difference in the hollowbodies was the discontinuation of the X-Bracing. I thought this was right around then.
The re-design of the truss rods also happened at this time.
There were also small headstocks and very slim necks, in general. Nice ramps as well. The early 80's also a period of iconic Hi-Gain sounds... Johnny Marr, Peter Buck, Paul Weller etc. It's a very nicely balance pickup, with a lower output than later hi-gains. These guitars also had the vintage style electronics with the tone cap inline with the bridge pickup.
Another thing to note is that the early to mid 80's were some of the worst years in company history in terms of sales. Not very many guitars were made. I have friend who called the factory in 1983 and I think they shipped his guitar in 2-3 weeks. So I like to think that maybe some of the guitars got a little more love in the woodshop... who knows.

Great Ramp In My Opinion.
- paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
I special-ordered a Rick 360 WB in Azure-Glo Blue towards the end of `84, with the new "vintage chrome bar pickups" and it arrived in about five months or less. 
It is X-braced, and has the thicker top. Cool guitar.

It is X-braced, and has the thicker top. Cool guitar.

There is no reason to ever be bored.
...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...
"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...
"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
Awesome Paul... post a photo!paologregorio wrote:I special-ordered a Rick 360 WB in Azure-Glo Blue towards the end of `84, with the new "vintage chrome bar pickups" and it arrived in about five months or less.
It is X-braced, and has the thicker top. Cool guitar.
Great Ramp In My Opinion.
- johnnysain
- Member
- Posts: 467
- Joined: Sat Nov 29, 2008 8:00 am
Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
Therefore, the year 1984 ushered in the era known as the 'CBS years'.....(Changes By Son).sloop_john_b wrote:
In 1984 John Hall (current CEO) took over the company from his father Francis (F.C.) Hall. The result of this was the introduction of new models, finishes, and trim options, the discontinuation of others, and a general modernization of the factory, production process, image, and marketing.
Rickenbacker player since 1978
- paologregorio
- Senior Member
- Posts: 6374
- Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
Here you go:egosheep wrote:Awesome Paul... post a photo!paologregorio wrote:I special-ordered a Rick 360 WB in Azure-Glo Blue towards the end of `84, with the new "vintage chrome bar pickups" and it arrived in about five months or less.
It is X-braced, and has the thicker top. Cool guitar.
There is no reason to ever be bored.
...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...
"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...
"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
I've seen and heard that guitar...definitely a good one!paologregorio wrote:Here you go:

Re: Why is '84 the vintage cutoff?
Could be BC and AC (Before CEO... After CEO). 

Manta (Tim Rock)
http://www.mantaraymusic.com
1993 Plus FG, 730L-12, 4001FL, Danelectro 6/12, Storyboard Strat
http://www.mantaraymusic.com
1993 Plus FG, 730L-12, 4001FL, Danelectro 6/12, Storyboard Strat