67HEAVEN

leftybass · Post by **leftybass** » Fri Mar 30, 2012 8:13 pm

One of the best ones I've ever seen.

Looks like it needs hang-tags to be NOS.....no fade at all.

I would rate this as under-the-bed-magnificant.

Congrats Tony....dunno how you do it man..!!

johnallg · Post by **johnallg** » Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:35 pm

leftybass wrote:One of the best ones I've ever seen. Looks like it needs hang-tags to be NOS.....no fade at all.

I would rate this as under-the-bed-magnificant.

Congrats Tony....dunno how you do it man..!!

His nose is tuned (attuned) to Rickenbacker basses.

teeder · Post by **teeder** » Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:36 am

Amazing! You"re killin' me, Tony!

Congrats!

marc61 · Post by **marc61** » Sat Mar 31, 2012 9:52 am

I know where he got it. Tony walked into an old music store where they forgot to put it out in 1967. Finding it in the storage room, they thought to themselves...hey no discounts here, we're putting this baby out for full retail...$295 plus tax...

Congrats Tony. When one of us gets a bass like this, it's like we all did

jps · Post by **jps** » Sat Mar 31, 2012 2:49 pm

marc61 wrote:Congrats Tony. When one of us gets a bass like this, it's like we all did

I don't know about that, I just looked in my closet and it's not there.

pag · Post by **pag** » Sun Apr 01, 2012 7:41 am

A beautiful bass Tony.
And the slim "tail" treble surround adds to the gorgeous look.
By the way, I have seen a 1968 (last batch of RMs?) with similar pale wings.
Look after her, but remember...
Future generations need to hear these instruments so play it and record it.

cheyenne · Post by **cheyenne** » Sun Apr 01, 2012 8:42 am

That looks like a good one to for the folks at RIC to examine and take measurments from for the fabled V68.

or in this case, V67.

opticnerve · Post by **opticnerve** » Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:02 am

Once again, thanks to all!

bassduke49 wrote:Looks like a "Cover Girl" for a certain project. Know what I mean? Tony, we should talk!

Sounds good Paul! I suppose she is "cover girl" material, 'ey?

PM sent.

walker wrote:By the way - since you rated this bass 9.5 out of 10, where's the .5 flaw? I can't see it!

Well there are a few tiny nicks here & there & a small amount of buckle worming on the back, otherwise I would have called it near mint.

jps wrote:Really nice find, Tony! How is the magnetism on the shoes?

The shoes have a decent charge...but not as strong as older hs pickups. These wider gap late '60s horseshoes don't have as stong a charge as the pre '66 shoes.

BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS wrote:tony...i hate you !!!

Don't be a Ricken-hater Ronbo!

johnallg wrote:Tony, you are one lucky guy! I don't know what you paid, don't want to, but I would have too. Maybe I SHOULD plan a trip east!

Well John, I didn't underpay...it wasn't cheap. I figured it was a once in a lifetime opportunity, so I pulled out all the stops & made it happen.

Ontario_RIC_fan wrote:I like it!! Sn??

Hey Brian, it's GF3136.

ilan wrote:Congrats. Take good care of her for future generations!

pag wrote:A beautiful bass Tony.
And the slim "tail" treble surround adds to the gorgeous look.
By the way, I have seen a 1968 (last batch of RMs?) with similar pale wings.
Look after her, but remember...
Future generations need to hear these instruments so play it and record it.

Not to worry, I'm going to baby this one. It'll be in the same condition as it is today as long as I have it.
I do plan to record with it...but gigs will be a no-no.

leftybass wrote:....dunno how you do it man..!!

johnallg wrote:His nose is tuned (attuned) to Rickenbacker basses.

Thanks Guys! I still can't believe my luck!!! I don't know how I do it either, when I figure it out I'll let you know!

I suppose that the universe is looking out for me!

marc61 wrote:I know where he got it. Tony walked into an old music store where they forgot to put it out in 1967. Finding it in the storage room, they thought to themselves...hey no discounts here, we're putting this baby out for full retail...$295 plus tax...

I wish!!! LOL!!!

marc61 wrote: Congrats Tony. When one of us gets a bass like this, it's like we all did

That's a nice sentiment John...I'm glad that I can share the experience with you guys!

cheyenne wrote:That looks like a good one to for the folks at RIC to examine and take measurments from for the fabled V68.

or in this case, V67.

Hmmm, I don't know...I would imagine that they have a few of these hanging around.

JWR · Post by **JWR** » Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:08 am

Simply superb

teeder · Post by **teeder** » Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:50 am

Man, a Deluxe '67 is pretty rare too!

JakeK · Post by **JakeK** » Sun Apr 01, 2012 12:02 pm

A little late to the party...been working at a new job...a lot and hardly have time for the forum these days...

At any rate, congrats on the awesome score Tony! IIRC, you own a 1999, how does this 4001 compare to it?

loendmaestro · Post by **loendmaestro** » Sun Apr 01, 2012 5:26 pm

Four pages of responses & I can't come up with a single thing to say. I'm speechless.
What a beautiful instrument. A hearty congratulations sir.

opticnerve · Post by **opticnerve** » Sun Apr 01, 2012 5:42 pm

teeder wrote:Man, a Deluxe '67 is pretty rare too!

Yes Kevin, as far as I know, '67 was a low production year.

Jake & Chris...thanks! I'm a bit speechless myself!

s4001 · Post by **s4001** » Mon Apr 02, 2012 12:52 am

Holy cow! Holy Grail!

marc61 · Post by **marc61** » Mon Apr 02, 2012 2:10 am

opticnerve wrote:
marc61 wrote: Congrats Tony. When one of us gets a bass like this, it's like we all did
That's a nice sentiment John...I'm glad that I can share the experience with you guys!

As long as you don't make us share in the price. We're honored to share the experience

Rickresource Rickenbacker Forum

67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN

Re: 67HEAVEN