When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
I think it was just part of the DIY, natural-wood aesthetic of the time (which was an evolution from the decorative hippie aesthetic). Paul was into design. It was his bass; he could personalize it, paint it, un-paint it, & do whatever his fancy suggested. (Plus he was high.)
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
Interesting question.
Did anyone ever think about asking McCartney himself?
*maybe he wanted the bass to look less pointy?
*maybe he wanted to annoy the RIC people by creating a demand for ugly 4001s basses (which actually seemed to have worked)?
*maybe the wood splintered and he decided to remove it all?
*maybe he felt like ruining a nice bass just because he could?
*maybe he actually likes that look (OMG)
*...
Did anyone ever think about asking McCartney himself?
*maybe he wanted the bass to look less pointy?
*maybe he wanted to annoy the RIC people by creating a demand for ugly 4001s basses (which actually seemed to have worked)?
*maybe the wood splintered and he decided to remove it all?
*maybe he felt like ruining a nice bass just because he could?
*maybe he actually likes that look (OMG)
*...
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
He has experimented with a lot of different looks. Zero fret, no zero fret. Horseshoe , no horseshoe. He has been messing with the 4001 since 1967.
- 12stringbassist
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 579
- Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2005 7:44 am
- Contact:
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
I'll go with back problems and bass weight.
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
Saying it was to reduce weight seems like a vain attempt to give the "mod" some kind of purpose beyond "he felt like it" and admitting it wasen't the best idea. If you wanted to reduce the weight on the bass, sanding off a few inches of wood is not where i'd start looking.
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
Obviously it is the way he wanted it at the time. We all do that to our basses, make them the way we want them.
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
johnallg wrote:Obviously it is the way he wanted it at the time. We all do that to our basses, make them the way we want them.
- atomic_punk
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
- Contact:
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
Let's move on to the Red Wings sticker on his Texan. Why?
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
I think the Magical Mystery Tour paint came off, because it was already flaking off. It was just spray paint. The back of the body was painted white while the neck remained fireglo. It was all stripped down during LET IT BE. As for why he shavedthehorns, who knows?SamBailler wrote:The original sanding was to remove the trippy psych paint job from '67 (times had changed). I am sure that this was only the front of the body that was done. This would have left him with a 'natural' finish on the front with the original '65 Fireglo everywhere else.
He obviously decided to make the whole thing 'natural' one day on the farm. Depending on what type of sander he used (my guess is a rectangular belt style job), removing the finish from the edges inside the horns would necessitate sacrificing the pointy bits to gain access. It would be pretty impossible to do those inside edges with that kind of tool without losing some wood on the way in.
- sloop_john_b
- Rick-a-holic
- Posts: 13843
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
Wings, his band!atomic_punk wrote:Let's move on to the Red Wings sticker on his Texan. Why?
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
I'm taking Shaved Horns for a band name.simer4001 wrote:I think the Magical Mystery Tour paint came off, because it was already flaking off. It was just spray paint. The back of the body was painted white while the neck remained fireglo. It was all stripped down during LET IT BE. As for why he shavedthehorns, who knows?
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
Horns still have their points while working on RAM.
All I wanna do is rock!
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
Awesome!Grey wrote:I'm taking Shaved Horns for a band name.simer4001 wrote:I think the Magical Mystery Tour paint came off, because it was already flaking off. It was just spray paint. The back of the body was painted white while the neck remained fireglo. It was all stripped down during LET IT BE. As for why he shavedthehorns, who knows?
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
Did McCartney really ever say that he had a bad back? Or was he saying that the Rick felt heavy compared to the Hofner?
Re: When did McCartney sand off the points on the "horns?"
Aren't they called 'cutaways', not 'horns'?
Horns are what you get when you mess with the bull.
The bass looked best in Fireglo, for sure.
Jimmy McCulloch=best guitarist he ever had.
Horns are what you get when you mess with the bull.
The bass looked best in Fireglo, for sure.
Jimmy McCulloch=best guitarist he ever had.
Rickenbacker 330 Jetglo
Rickenbacker 4003s/5 White
Mesa Rectoverb Head
Mesa Standard Rectifier 4x12 cabinet
Mesa Rocket 44 Combo amp
Rickenbacker 4003s/5 White
Mesa Rectoverb Head
Mesa Standard Rectifier 4x12 cabinet
Mesa Rocket 44 Combo amp
