C64 4001 Machine Heads

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
tallben
New member
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:59 pm

C64 4001 Machine Heads

Post by tallben »

Hello

I just got a brand new Fireglo 4001 C64 Bass guitar.

I noticed a peculiarity with the way that the tuning keys operate...

On my V63 (and all my other guitars for that matter!) you rotate the machine heads for the E & A strings clockwise to decrease the pitch. On the C64 this increases the pitch.

I just wanted to know if this was normal, as I don't remember seeing it mentioned anywhere.

Cheers, Ben
User avatar
scoobster28
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 707
Joined: Sun Jan 28, 2001 1:16 pm

Post by scoobster28 »

Ben,
When you change the strings, just wind it the OPPOSITE direction and it should come out all right. Look at the headstock and see the way the strings are wound on the posts, and then when you restring just do the opposite.
Ben
"Here he is, come to pay homage to the Rickenbacker display!" (Said to me by owner Bruce at the "Great House of Guitars" in Rochester, NY)
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Welcome to the wacky world of vintage instruments. Sounds like these are reverse wind vintage keys, if so that is normal. Back in the '50s the world rotated the opposite direction so the tuning keys also work backwards!Image
tallben
New member
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:59 pm

Post by tallben »

Thanks guys

A lot of comparisons have been made between the C64 and the V63. I was just suprised that no one had mentioned this difference before.

My strings are wound onto the capstan correctly, i.e. from the inside rather than the outside. This gives the most direct string routing from the nut, rather than them turning through a more acute angle.

I'm not particularly bothered about changing the way they work, I just wondered if everyone else's C64 was the same, and why nobody had mentioned it.

Cheers, Ben

Ben
User avatar
iamthebassman
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2415
Joined: Tue May 28, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by iamthebassman »

My '80 4003 has factory reverse-wind nickel tuners.
"Top 10 Best Bass Players" Austin Music Poll 2014, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12659
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

I can't saw exactly which ones, but some of my basses, probably the '80s ones, have reverse-wind tuners, too.
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12659
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Post by doctorwho »

ARGH! "saw" -> "say"!!!!
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37503
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Saw-say:see-saw!Image
User avatar
rickinroma
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1109
Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 11:27 pm
Contact:

Post by rickinroma »

My '67 4005 and the '79 4001 both have reverse wind tuners... my '97 4001V63 has regular ones
RutleDirk
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2001 3:51 pm

Post by RutleDirk »

My lefty 4001C64S has the reverse tuners as well.

Then again, it has reversed POTS, too! Volume increase is counter-clockwise, rather than clockwise. The tone pots are similarly reversed.

Was this the way a lefty instrument would have been wired in '64?
RutleDirk
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2001 3:51 pm

Post by RutleDirk »

I also have to play with my back to the audience, or it's out of phase.
rick12dr
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1209
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2000 7:51 pm

Post by rick12dr »

Your back is out of phase? Ouch!!
RutleDirk
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 429
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2001 3:51 pm

Post by RutleDirk »

No, the audience...
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”