My New PROJECT 4001v63

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
Scotty_Guitar
New member
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:15 pm

My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by Scotty_Guitar »

Anyone recognize this bass?
Attachments
10599MaplegloG8-7159-4001V63-6_001.jpg
10599MaplegloG8-7159-4001V63_022.jpg
“John always played like it was his last day on the planet.” Ringo Star
User avatar
Scotty_Guitar
New member
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:15 pm

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by Scotty_Guitar »

It has Bartolini p'ups, and a double battery box on the rear... I plan on removing and filling the battery box, and restoring the p'ups and guard to "original" as best I can... Also, considering the scars from the battery box, the new Midnight Blue color looks mighty appealing!

When stripping the finish, should I completely strip it off to bare wood (including the fretboard)??? Or use current finish as a "filler, and just "paint" over it???
“John always played like it was his last day on the planet.” Ringo Star
User avatar
s4001
Senior Member
Posts: 3514
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2005 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by s4001 »

I followed the story of that bass. Question - how does it sound?
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by ken_j »

The location of the battery boxes defeats the purpose of the neck through IMO.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
weemac
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2735
Joined: Tue Mar 26, 2002 1:28 am

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by weemac »

It's still neck through.... Neck throught to pickup!

Eden.
I confused Faraday's cage, with Schrodinger's cat box....
User avatar
Scotty_Guitar
New member
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:15 pm

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by Scotty_Guitar »

s4001 wrote:I followed the story of that bass. Question - how does it sound?
Well, I've no direct answer, other than I'm neither a fan of RWs, nor "powered" pickups.

That said, the most obvious difference is that it is quieter than Rick's stock single coils. Comparing it to my 2012 4003, I still preferred the 4003 p'ups. IMO, the Barts didn't bring enough to the instrument to warrant destroying it's "collector value," and possibly its neck through integrity.

Would you please link me to this story? I'd like to know more about it...

Now that it's been fairly ruined, it frees me up to give it whatever make-over I wish! 8)
“John always played like it was his last day on the planet.” Ringo Star
User avatar
Scotty_Guitar
New member
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:15 pm

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by Scotty_Guitar »

ken_j wrote:The location of the battery boxes defeats the purpose of the neck through IMO.
AGREED!!! I worried about that for a while before buying it... However, I think I can restore the neck thru function, though I doubt I can make it look pretty enough to keep the MapleGlo finish...
“John always played like it was his last day on the planet.” Ringo Star
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by ken_j »

weemac wrote:It's still neck through.... Neck throught to pickup!

Eden.
To the bridge is what matters to me, although the neck through is very thin under the rear pickup route.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
Scotty_Guitar
New member
Posts: 81
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2008 8:15 pm

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by Scotty_Guitar »

ken_j wrote:
weemac wrote:It's still neck through.... Neck throught to pickup!

Eden.
To the bridge is what matters to me, although the neck through is very thin under the rear pickup route.
The continuity from tuner to bridge is what matters most, as far as I know... Which means at least half the depth is undisturbed from headstock to bridge. To install a battery box anywhere "in-line" is a definite "no-no!" I wish it were under the pick-guard, where it wouldn't interfere with the neck-through integrity... And, almost as important, more easily concealed.

Other than color, I'm certain it can be restored. My major decisions are simply "what color," and how far to strip the original finish.
“John always played like it was his last day on the planet.” Ringo Star
User avatar
Badanovski
Member
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:19 pm

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by Badanovski »

I doubt filling the battery compartment route will make much difference in sound. I have a 4003S that the previous owner put a Bartolini Musicman pickup in the bridge position, moved towards the bridge approx. 1". With the neck pickup moved an 1" also it's probably got the same amount of wood removed. The bass still sounds thunderous. If the look bothers you fill it, but don't expect much difference in sound.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by jps »

IMHO I don't think the route for the battery compartment being near the bridge end of the neck-through makes a difference to tone. If it were, say, right near the neck pickup route there would be an issue, structurally, and maybe, tonally.

If Rick built two identical basses, except that one of them had the neck only going so far as the front edge of the bridge pickup route (with the rest being an integral part of the body, similar to what S.D. Curlee did in the '70s) would there be a real noticeable tonal difference? :?
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by sloop_john_b »

ken_j wrote:The location of the battery boxes defeats the purpose of the neck through IMO.
The "purpose" of the neck through is ease of construction more than anything IMO. Any "improved" tonal qualities are a happy accident.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by teeder »

A lot of people rave about the tone and punch of the set-neck Ricks. I don't think this route is any problem other than looks.
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by ken_j »

The continuity of the neck through would most likely affect sustain. As we all know there are many other factors to this including the bridge, wood type,etc... I am certainly not saying more sustain is better than less, just different.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
coolingitdown
Intermediate Member
Posts: 595
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 12:47 am

Re: My New PROJECT 4001v63

Post by coolingitdown »

Scotty_Guitar wrote:Anyone recognize this bass?
I think I do. Wasn't that bass on the 'bay for what felt like years!?

I remember looking at it and thinking that with enough money and time it would be a great restoration project. As the father of a newborn, however, I am short on both of those things.
2010 4003 FG
1997 4003FL Turquoise
Set neck 4001S (color TBD)
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”