72 4001 MapleGlo

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
squirebass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1581
Joined: Fri Oct 13, 2000 11:05 pm

Post by squirebass »

Bob, mine is not that flamey, but the body is a beautiful fireglo. Its not in mint condition, but I looked for a bass like this for a long time, and I love her very much! Apparently, 21 fret 4001s were made from about 1970 to 1971, as far as we've been able to tell. Mr Sergio Silva has one from 1970, I believe, in fireglo, and there is another member here who has a burgandyglo 21 fretter, don't remember the year. I need to get my digital camera fixed, and when I do, I will get some pictures out there! Oh, and by the way, my bass is a Feb, '71. It seems to me that around 1972, Rick 4001 basses became more plentiful, relatively speaking, and I only rarely see 1970 or 1971 models, altho I go to a lot of Guitar shows looking for just that. Whatever the year tho, I love Ricks, and although the sound of the new ones is different in some ways from the old classics, I dearly love both in their own ways!
"This is the big one, Elizabeth, I'm coming to join ya, honey!"
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

Hey Bob, here's some 21 fretters for your viewing pleasure: Gene's Feb 71, Grant Arthur's Jan 71, my Nov 70 (pickguard not original), a (presumably) late 71 which appeared on Ebay in July 2003, and a (presumably) 70 from someone's bass collection.
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

Here is Chris Squire with his 21 fret 4001 in '71

Image
User avatar
jaymi
Advanced Member
Posts: 2332
Joined: Wed May 26, 2004 5:00 am
Contact:

Post by jaymi »

Those are all really nice
78 Purple 4001
88 BLACKSTAR
89 BLACKSTAR
89 Mid Blue
91 Mid Blue
ken_swearingen
Advanced Member
Posts: 2298
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2004 6:00 pm

Post by ken_swearingen »

bob,what a nice bass,beautiful color,great shape you must be proud.
User avatar
beatlefan
Senior Member
Posts: 4345
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 4:13 pm

Post by beatlefan »

Please forgive my ignorance....
Would someone enlighten me on the 21 fret deal?

Why do they exist, how many did RIC produce and what years???
1973 4001 MG cb fwi
1986 4003 Shadow
2012 4004Cii FG w/gold trim
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

Im with Chris, was it an idea that never really got off the ground?

What was the advantage?

Also, did they compensate the extra length by moving the bridge up a touch? I think this kinda looks odd.
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Post by jps »

The advantage of 21 frets is that you now have a full three octaves from E to E.
rickcrazy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 3578
Joined: Thu May 30, 2002 4:11 am

Post by rickcrazy »

And yes, the bridge assembly was moved up a bit accordingly.
Another advantage of that feature is that it now imparts added desirability to the perennially fascinating 4001 Model bass.
(Ah! I always wanted to say that line!)Image
A Rickenbacker bass is much like the Jaguar E car - perennially ultra-fashionable.
User avatar
beatlefan
Senior Member
Posts: 4345
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 4:13 pm

Post by beatlefan »

Ok...got all that, but was it a special order option?... Or did they just show up here and there as an anomaly to the RIC line?

Oh, and do they take the same length truss rod system?
1973 4001 MG cb fwi
1986 4003 Shadow
2012 4004Cii FG w/gold trim
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

Taking a wild guess here, but since J Hall commented here that you can chop 1 inch off your old-style rods and they will be good as new, I'm assuming RIC used the standard length rods for the 21 fretters. But I don't know that for sure.

I wonder if the 21 fretters sound different from normal 4001's of the period; and if they sounded better, maybe that's what prompted RIC to move the neck pickup back another half inch three years later.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Post by leftybass »

Chris, most of these 21-fret 4001 basses show up from late 1970 thru 1971 production as was posted above. It appears that building basses with 21-fret necks was not a standardized practice at Rickenbacker, and I believe it was something that most people didn't even notice at the time....not that these 21-fret basses are considered as a custom-built piece, just extra-ordinary.

Rickenbacker was building many interesting instruments during this time...MANY custom-built pieces went out the door, as well as instruments like the Light-Show guitars/basses, slant-fret necks, the first 24-fret neck 360's, Greenglo and Blueglo finishes etc...
User avatar
beatlefan
Senior Member
Posts: 4345
Joined: Mon May 19, 2003 4:13 pm

Post by beatlefan »

Ah..Thanks John...I somehow missed Gene's post

Just another interesting aspect of RIC's production practices!!! Fascinating!!
1973 4001 MG cb fwi
1986 4003 Shadow
2012 4004Cii FG w/gold trim
User avatar
cheyenne
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6263
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2001 11:39 am

Post by cheyenne »

So, it sounds like the 21 fretter's are truley the "Holy Grail" of Rick basses, with the exception of maybe the 4002.

I'll ask the obvious, what would you expect to pay for one from a dealer?

Also, any clue on how many were made?
"Knowledge is Power"
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Post by ilan »

"... sounds like the 21 fretter's are truley the 'Holy Grail' of Rick basses, with the exception of maybe the 4002"

4002's are all 21 fretters. Right, Ted?
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”