Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by heinpete »

:roll: Has there ever been a series of 4000/4001/4003 with a metal bridge PU cover instead of plastic? (No, not the HS! :wink: )
I once had one on a 1983 4003 (split pick guard), but that could well have been an aftermarket piece of a faker. :oops:
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by cjj »

I vaguely remember seeing one way back in the late '70s or early '80s on another guy's bass, but that may well have been a faker. I had no idea fakes existed back in those days. I just remember commenting on how his was sheet metal and my '74 I had at the time had chrome plated plastic...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by jdogric12 »

weren't they metal up to about 73?
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by bassduke49 »

Not on my '72. Plastic. I seem to remember JH saying something about the early faux covers (post Horseshoe) being metal before they came up with the plastic one, but I've never been able to find one.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
Kopfjaeger
Advanced Member
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 8:49 am

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by Kopfjaeger »

Along the same topic, were all the chromed plastic covers shaped the same? I sorta remember hearing that the early 70's ones had a different radius on the curve than the modern ones. They all have the same footprint, I believe, True or false? My 73 did not come with a cover.

Sepp
Vintage/Classic Rickenbacker Enthusiast!
1972 4001 Jetglo
1973 4001 Burgundyglo
2011 4003 Jetglo
1986 4003 Shadow
User avatar
badeggs
Intermediate Member
Posts: 865
Joined: Tue Jul 24, 2007 5:04 am

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by badeggs »

Kopfjaeger wrote:Along the same topic, were all the chromed plastic covers shaped the same?
The older ones are shorter/sit closer to the strings. I'm not sure when the tall covers first appeared. Late 70s, maybe?
User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by heinpete »

... the shorter ones came with the first Higains to my knowledge. I assume there is also a correlation with the appearence of the dented bridge-PU surround :roll: ? This is clearly an item to be discussed (was it) in the bass book!
Paul B., can you enlighten the community, please? :wink:
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by bassduke49 »

Well, I know there are at least two different sizes of the plastic cover (height difference, not span). And I know that there is a "scooped" treble pickup surround and the older "unscooped" style, but since these parts are interchangeable, it is difficult to establish exactly when they appeared/disappeared in production. And since details such as these are ephemeral, I may pass mentioning them in the book unless they can be anchored down in a timeline. In other words, more info may be needed by some, but eventually (and soon) I gotta quit gathering the info and start publishing the info. That's not to say that more info and corrections will be ignored; with any luck, more editions of the book will be needed down the road, and all that stuff may find its way in.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13218
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by rickenbrother »

Several years ago there was a forumite who claimed to have a metal pickup cover. The story moved along that he was supposedly going to send it to RIC so they could possibly recreate it. IIRC, it never left the guy's house, if he really had one.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by ken_j »

If I recall correctly the earlier short cover fits on the bottom side of the bezel above the springs. The newer taller version sits below the spings and moves up and down with the pickup heigt adjustment.
A friend who purchased a '69 4001 new had the short plastic cover on his bass. I purchased a new '68 4000 that was shipped from the factory in the same shipment, it had a HS.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by jps »

ken_j wrote:If I recall correctly the earlier short cover fits on the bottom side of the bezel above the springs. The newer taller version sits below the spings and moves up and down with the pickup heigt adjustment.
Correct. I like that the old, short ones stay in the same place, vs. the current, moving one.
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by cjj »

jps wrote:
ken_j wrote:If I recall correctly the earlier short cover fits on the bottom side of the bezel above the springs. The newer taller version sits below the spings and moves up and down with the pickup heigt adjustment.
Correct. I like that the old, short ones stay in the same place, vs. the current, moving one.
+1!
Hey, maybe RIC should reissue short covers...
:roll: :lol:
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37507
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by jps »

I don't know the reason for the change in construction, but possibly for strength. I think the thinner cross section of the old design is more elegant looking, certainly.
User avatar
antipodean
Senior Member
Posts: 3182
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 1:27 am

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by antipodean »

I prefer the old "low profile" covers, but the fact that the high profile covers moves with pickup height makes them cosmetically more akin to the original 'shoes.
"I don't want to sound incredulous but I can't believe it" Rex Mossop
User avatar
Fuzzy Thoughts
New member
Posts: 65
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2011 1:33 pm
Contact:

Re: Metal Bridge PU Cover?

Post by Fuzzy Thoughts »

cjj wrote:
jps wrote:
ken_j wrote:If I recall correctly the earlier short cover fits on the bottom side of the bezel above the springs. The newer taller version sits below the spings and moves up and down with the pickup heigt adjustment.
Correct. I like that the old, short ones stay in the same place, vs. the current, moving one.
+1!
Hey, maybe RIC should reissue short covers...
:roll: :lol:
If you ever tune it to BEAD you will appreciate the height of the current covers.. granted you might have to add more spacers..
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”