Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
T.A.R.
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1413
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:39 am

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by T.A.R. »

Just one of the reasons I love this place. :D
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

teeder wrote:
johnallg wrote:
jps wrote:I consider it a 4001S as it was never exported to/imported by Rose-Morris; why would it be considered a RM1999 at all?
Between John's Radio-Tel quote and your logic, that for me defines it.
Me too!

I would be surprised if any of Rickenbacker's records mention "1999" at all. They would have been 4000+1 and not a 1999 until in RM's hands.
The ONLY real difference is the backwards headstock
( It wasn't an export which he purchased, it was built specifically for and given to him )
IIRC, wasn't Paul's the first lefty?


be interesting, teed, to know how many early-mid sixties 4000/4001 leftys there were !!! :idea:
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by sloop_john_b »

None, Ron. Supposedly there is a '67 out there. And John's '69.

Do I have that all right John? :)
User avatar
pag
Intermediate Member
Posts: 515
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:37 am

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by pag »

I would say Pauls bass is technically a 4000 with added neck pickup.
I say that because in my letter of reply from Mr.Hall about DA24 which I used to own and is the serial number next to Pauls
bass he stated that DA24 was made in Jan 1961 and should have been a 4000 single pickup bass.
However a look under the pickguard and you could see it had been obviously made as a two pickup bass from the factory.
So its possible these serial numbers were some of the first dot neck two pickup basses in the 4000 series and were to be
re-numbered 4001 at a later date when the binding and inlays were developed as more deluxe features.
So in my mind the type of bass we call an RM from pre-Rose Morris period is really a 4000 with two pickups until it appears on the order books as 4001s later on.
Its a guess but it could explain the confusion.

Paul imported his own bass so its the first PMC by a long chalk.
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by ilan »

pag wrote:he stated that DA24 was made in Jan 1961
Surely you mean 1964?
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
Ivan3000
Advanced Member
Posts: 2392
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by Ivan3000 »

pag wrote:I would say Pauls bass is technically a 4000 with added neck pickup.
I say that because in my letter of reply from Mr.Hall about DA24 which I used to own and is the serial number next to Pauls
bass he stated that DA24 was made in Jan 1961 and should have been a 4000 single pickup bass.
However a look under the pickguard and you could see it had been obviously made as a two pickup bass from the factory.
So its possible these serial numbers were some of the first dot neck two pickup basses in the 4000 series and were to be
re-numbered 4001 at a later date when the binding and inlays were developed as more deluxe features.
So in my mind the type of bass we call an RM from pre-Rose Morris period is really a 4000 with two pickups until it appears on the order books as 4001s later on.
Its a guess but it could explain the confusion.

Paul imported his own bass so its the first PMC by a long chalk.
What ever happened to it?
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by bassduke49 »

Macca still has the Rick and has been seen in the background in some recent interview videos. He just doesn't use it in performances anymore, it seems. :(
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
Baker69
Member
Posts: 290
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 2:31 am

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by Baker69 »

I read somewhere that he had the original bridge pickup on his 4001S changed (and also the chrome surround). What was it replaced with, a high-gain?

Would the original have had the finger rest? I can't see any evidence of it on later photo's of the 'stripped-down' version. If it was replaced perhaps Rickenbacker also replaced the pickguard to rid of the screw-holes it would have left.
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by bassduke49 »

Apparently the bass was never fitted with the tug bar. The pickguard, treble (bridge) pickup and its surround were replaced at Rickenbacker, and a zero fret was added at PM's request. The 4001C64S represents the look of PM's after the repairs and the body horns were sanded. I believe the pickup is an original Horseshoe in a new surround.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by JakeK »

When it was sent back to the factory in 1974 or 1975 for repairs, the original HS was beyond useable, so a Hi-Gain was put in its place, and Paul played the bass without a pickup cover. In about 1987 or 1988, with the 4001V63 and it's reissue HS pickup becoming popular, it appears that Paul had a reissue HS pickup put in and that's how the bass remains.
Ivan3000
Advanced Member
Posts: 2392
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by Ivan3000 »

IvanMunoz wrote:
pag wrote:I would say Pauls bass is technically a 4000 with added neck pickup.
I say that because in my letter of reply from Mr.Hall about DA24 which I used to own and is the serial number next to Pauls
bass he stated that DA24 was made in Jan 1961 and should have been a 4000 single pickup bass.
However a look under the pickguard and you could see it had been obviously made as a two pickup bass from the factory.
So its possible these serial numbers were some of the first dot neck two pickup basses in the 4000 series and were to be
re-numbered 4001 at a later date when the binding and inlays were developed as more deluxe features.
So in my mind the type of bass we call an RM from pre-Rose Morris period is really a 4000 with two pickups until it appears on the order books as 4001s later on.
Its a guess but it could explain the confusion.

Paul imported his own bass so its the first PMC by a long chalk.
What ever happened to it?
I should have been more clear. What ever happened to DA24, sorry about that guys.
User avatar
bosco64
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 904
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2000 5:49 am
Contact:

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by bosco64 »

IvanMunoz wrote:I should have been more clear. What ever happened to DA24, sorry about that guys.
I think they just told you...
"Keep smiling, keep your mouth shut, and nobody gets hurt!" :mrgreen:
Don't bust Mike's chops...
'05 4003 BBR; '99 4001V63 FG; '96 4003S Trans Blue (custom refin from Paul W.)
User avatar
leftybass
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5359
Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2001 10:23 am

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by leftybass »

sloop_john_b wrote:None, Ron. Supposedly there is a '67 out there. And John's '69.

Do I have that all right John? :)
Pretty much, and the '67 is supposed to be a 4001-S, a twin to McCartney's. Mine is (so far) the only lefty deluxe that has surfaced, but we'll see.....BUT..HAVING SAID THAT.....

I think that there is a possibility the bass that Ed Gagliardi had in the early days of Foreigner may be another pre-1970 4001 LH....it is hard to see pics of it with all the details we need to see to make the call, but it is an ongoing investigation for me.

The Foreigner bass had the wider pickguard and a high-gain bridge pickup which would make it no earlier that late-'68 early-'69.....I have not been able to tell if it is wired mono or for ROS, or how long the peghead is....If anyone has good pics of this bass, put 'em up so we can see them.
User avatar
Lefty4003S8
Intermediate Member
Posts: 822
Joined: Thu Jun 04, 2009 10:05 am

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by Lefty4003S8 »

MANY years ago in a record store, I remember seeing a Foreigner poster where the bass-player was holding a Lefty Rickenbacker bass.
This was the second Lefty Rick bass I had ever seen.
Unfortunately, I didn't know much about Ricks back then.......I do remember it being Red----or Fireglo.

Anybody here have that poster????? :lol: :lol: :lol:

I would actually like to see that bass again!!!!!


Lefty4003s8






Do not drink from the toilet when taking Lyrica
Do not drink from the toilet when taking Lyrica
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: Sir Paul's Rickenbacker Bass

Post by cjj »

Is this the bass you remember?
Ed Gagliardi.jpg
Ed Gagliardi.jpg (3.82 KiB) Viewed 1953 times
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”