Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
User avatar
The Mod Lang
Junior Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:04 am
Contact:

Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by The Mod Lang »

My gal is looking at getting a rickenbacker bass and wondered why the 4001s were more. Probably an easy question, but the 4001 does seem like a simpler bass model because it has no binding, dot inlays, and not push-pull nob. Why the price difference?
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by sloop_john_b »

You're talking specifically about the "4001s" or "RM1999" (British export version; same instrument). They're more expensive because they were used by several of the important Rick bass guys - namely Paul McCartney and Chris Squire, and others to a lesser degree - on very famous recordings. They're also more scarce then the deluxe versions. No version of this bass is currently in production.
User avatar
The Mod Lang
Junior Member
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:04 am
Contact:

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by The Mod Lang »

sloop_john_b wrote:You're talking specifically about the "4001s" or "RM1999" (British export version; same instrument). They're more expensive because they were used by several of the important Rick bass guys - namely Paul McCartney and Chris Squire, and others to a lesser degree - on very famous recordings. They're also more scarce then the deluxe versions. No version of this bass is currently in production.
I'm just talking about the normal 4001c64 american models made today.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by sloop_john_b »

The 4001c64 is a reissue of the 4001s/RM1999. They're more expensive (presumably) because of the R&D that went into the "C Series", specifically CNC programming, tooling for new parts and hardware, etc.

For all guitar manufacturers, reissues are typically more expensive then standard models. Your options are pony up five figures for an original '64 or find a reissue for a fifth of the price.

They were discontinued several years ago.
User avatar
T28
Member
Posts: 403
Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 1:31 am

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by T28 »

sloop_john_b wrote:They were discontinued several years ago.
yes, the only thing you might find now is either used or NOS (new old stock).
For about $15 you can add a push/pull to one if that is a selling feature.
It does make the 4001 a bit more versatile and if you add in a better cap improves the sound slightly imo.
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by woodyng »

It's the upside-down headstock. :mrgreen: also,that model has the horseshoe,toaster,etc...
Seriously,the dot neck models were never made in the same quantities as the deluxe models,or at least never were as popular, (go figure) and so tend to run a bit higher as a result of relative availability/scarce-ness. Mid-to-late 70's era 4001 basses with the deluxe features can be had for about the same price as a new 4003...
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by johnhall »

Just as a point of interest, one of the bigger costs was replicating the tuning keys. We had to pay for all new tooling for these which had to be amortized over a fairly small number of units (as compared to mass produced, consumer-grade keywinds).
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by aceonbass »

I like those tuners John. I think you guys should put them on regular production 4003's too.
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by johnhall »

The spring plate on the modern keys goes a long way toward solving problems after the keys are broken in.
User avatar
chefothefuture
Advanced Member
Posts: 1886
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by chefothefuture »

aceonbass wrote:I like those tuners John. I think you guys should put them on regular production 4003's too.
Me too!

This may be a dumb question, but as these tuners were made for the 4001C64, does that mean that the sets available from the Boutique
are left overs, and that once they're sold out, they're gone?
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by aceonbass »

Good question. I've got a set set aside for my '64 4001S, but I'd like to know the answer to that question too.
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by johnhall »

chefothefuture wrote:
aceonbass wrote:I like those tuners John. I think you guys should put them on regular production 4003's too.
Me too!

This may be a dumb question, but as these tuners were made for the 4001C64, does that mean that the sets available from the Boutique are left overs, and that once they're sold out, they're gone?
Yes, that's probably true, as there would be little requirement to have these keys unless some other model that needed them were offered.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by aceonbass »

Why not continue making them anyway? I mean, you make a profit on them, and they can be used to restore older RIC basses that came with the Klusons.
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by johnhall »

The minumum order quantity would be a 20 year supply on a replacement parts basis. At current rates, there's probably at least a 5 years supply on hand anyway.
User avatar
bottom4
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 2063
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2002 6:24 am

Re: Why are 4001s more than 4003s?

Post by bottom4 »

johnhall wrote: At current rates, there's probably at least a 5 years supply on hand anyway.
That is until people catch on to this thread! LOL!
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”