Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by ilan »

jdogric12 wrote:
doctorwho wrote:To put this in perspective, remember that classical musicians play Stradivarius, Guarneri, and Amati instruments on stage ... if they were fragile after 300-400 years, they'd all be in museums (the instruments, not the musicians! :shock: ). :)
True, but the wildest orchestra show is still tamer than the tamest rock show!
True, but tell that to poor David Garret, who tripped and landed on his 300 years old Stradivarius, destroying it beyond repair. It was a magnificent instrument, insured for $5.5 million. I had the opportunity to hold it and look at it closely, about a year before the mishap.
mikko wrote:People often say that vintage instruments sound & play better. I agree, but why´s that? Why can´t the very same factory who made those great vintage instruments, anymore manufacture instruments as good as them? Or can they? (I´m not talking only about RIC but musical instrument manufacturers in general)
IME not true for Rics. Some of the best Rics I played were recent models.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
manta
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1338
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by manta »

And then there's the German-made cardboard Rickenbackers: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Pete Townshend Interview
"Townshend Talking"
From the April 1980 Issue of Sound International

Do you remember the first time you smashed a guitar?
PT: Beck was around. I think Roger first saw him when he was in a band called The Triads or The Tridents or something and he came back and said there was this incredible young guitar player. And Clapton was around and various other people who could really play and I was very frustrated because I couldn’t do all that flash stuff. So I just started getting into feedback and expressed myself physically. And it just led to when, one day, I was banging my guitar around making noises and I banged it on this ceiling in this club and the neck broke off, because Rickenbackers are made out of cardboard. And everybody started to laugh and they went, ‘Hah, that’ll teach you to be flash.’ So I thought what I was going to do, and I had no other recourse but to make it look like I had meant to do it. So I smashed this guitar and jumped all over the bits and then picked up the 12-tring and carried on as though nothing had happened. And the next day the place was packed. It turned into another form of expression for me: it was a gimmick of course.

AND

How did you happen to choose a Rickenbacker?
PT: I liked the look of it, I think because The Beatles were using them. They picked theirs up in Germany, they were real German ones.
Manta (Tim Rock)
http://www.mantaraymusic.com
1993 Plus FG, 730L-12, 4001FL, Danelectro 6/12, Storyboard Strat
Blackstar
New member
Posts: 84
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:43 pm

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by Blackstar »

I won't gig with my walnut '76 4001 because it's too precious to me - bought as a teen with paper route money (and the walnut finish cost me an extra $10). I will gig with my '89 Blackstar even though it's worth more than the 4001.
1976 4001 walnut
1989 4003 Blackstar
1989 Squier II Precision Bass
2010 Fender 60's Jazz Bass sunburst
2013 Fender Nate Mendel signature Precision Bass
User avatar
pag
Intermediate Member
Posts: 515
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:37 am

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by pag »

Any older guitars can have issues of fragility but I wouldnt generalise and say all vintage Ricks are fragile.
When I got my CS in 1991 it gave me the opportunity to leave my RM
at home still get a great classic Rick sound and not worry about damaging a rare bird by banging into low ceilings
or mic stands etc.
I still have a little ding in the end of the CS headstock from one of its first gigs at a club with a low ceiling so its as well Ileft the RM at home that night.
(looking at the photo I havent learned my lesson yet!)
I never leave a guitar on a stand when not onstage myself and I would urge anyone with a great guitar or a vintage one to do the same.
The RM below (DA24) had no real issues except for a bit of a crack in the fretboard/neck at the headstock
but I fixed that by bleeding Superglue into the crack and the neck was always as straight as a die.
I have had 3 RMs and apart from the ex-John Lodge one that had a bent headstock before I bought it the other two were as tough as nails.
I was in a new wave/punk band in 79 using DH163 (Gibb Bass)and I used to bend the neck on parts of a couple of songs to do a bit of
extreme vibrato basically just showing off!
Mr.Hall got it in one...its down to rarity and if you have another bass very similar but replacable if lost or damaged it makes sense to use that one
for some gigs.
Listening to Mark Walkers A/B demo of a 1968 and a recent Rick that sound really similar shows that modern Ricks still have it.
I still think theres a market for real replica vintage 4001 basses though.
Old Ricks are ok to gig with and they should be played regularly but I know where people are coming from if they decide to leave them at home.
Attachments
3894096926_eafae02d9d_s.jpg
3894096926_eafae02d9d_s.jpg (3.59 KiB) Viewed 1338 times
100_0071-1.jpg
DA24 copy2.jpg
User avatar
bartyclue
Intermediate Member
Posts: 619
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:11 pm

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by bartyclue »

Couldnt resist sharing this pic from a halloween. Me playing my vintage baby.
cs.jpg
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by teeder »

Cool picture!
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by walker »

Yeah, Brian. Nice shot! A couple of great CS basses there. Nice mojo on yours, Pete! Easily recognizable as your "live bass."
User avatar
doctorwho
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 12652
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2002 3:28 pm

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by doctorwho »

manta wrote:
Pete Townshend Interview
"Townshend Talking" ...

... They picked theirs up in Germany, they were real German ones.
:lol: :lol: :lol:
It is better, of course, to know useless things than to know nothing. - Seneca
felig
New member
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 1:27 pm

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by felig »

If a vintage bass is still playable after 40+ years, then it's durable. The string tension is the most demanding thing your bass will have to endure over time. I've got a 70s era neck-through Epiphone whose neck snapped in the through the body portion between the two pickups...that's fragile. Otherwise, you can bust anything, even a Steinberger, but that doesn't equate to fragile.
User avatar
Seans
Intermediate Member
Posts: 674
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:10 am

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by Seans »

Wow, 2nd post in 7 years Fred, good post though :) .
felig
New member
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 1:27 pm

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by felig »

Thanks--man, those seven years went by quickly! I plan to be more active here, nice forum.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by jps »

felig wrote:Thanks--man, those seven years went by quickly! I plan to be more active here, nice forum.
Welcome, Fred, as late as it may be! 8)
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

i had no problem gigging with all my different year ricks in standard tuning...but that last band really made it difficult with the step down tuning. and with how strongly i played with that band, i had to go to 110-50 strings to keep the tension up. drop "D" was a challenge which was actually low c# ,so since at this point they were my '64 and '68, i decided to retire them and get other firewood to burn on. since "my" retirement from said band, my ricks are in happy standard tuning and back with 105-45 since 1990.
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: Vintage Rics - Are they really that fragile?

Post by walker »

I hear you on the deep subs, Ronbo. Those Ricks can take the low tunings like a champ. There's a song in which I tune my E string (anywhere from 100 to 105 gauge) all the way down to B♭ and it rings true with no problem.

'The Seduction' bass iso
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”