XK x 2

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
rickyfricky
Intermediate Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:09 pm

XK x 2

Post by rickyfricky »

I was once told you remember your first and you remember your last -- it's all the one's in between that can be a bit of a blur. :wink:

My first is XK 1080: November '84 4001 FG.
My last is XK 1212: November '84 4003s MG (with ROS).

My question is this: In 1984 RIC was making 4001's and 4003's. What would be the difference in these models? (I know the "S" pictured is different with no binding, a dot board, and mono). But what differences would the regular 4001's and 4003's have in this time period?
Attachments
Sorry I can't figure out how to post this facing the right direction . . .
Sorry I can't figure out how to post this facing the right direction . . .
Watch those teeth, Marlin. I'm not sure we've properly sedated the beast . . .
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: XK x 2

Post by sloop_john_b »

The Fireglo is a 4003, not a 4001. Easiest way to tell is that is has no skunk stripe. Also appears to be a replacement pickguard ('84 should have a split two-piece guard).

Very nice. :D
User avatar
rickyfricky
Intermediate Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: XK x 2

Post by rickyfricky »

Here's where the plot thickens. The TRC on the FG reads model 4001.

And there was a letter from RIC (case candy) when I bought this, stating it's a 4001 manufactured in November of 1984.

Pix to follow.
Watch those teeth, Marlin. I'm not sure we've properly sedated the beast . . .
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: XK x 2

Post by sloop_john_b »

Do the truss rods adjust from the body end or the headstock?
User avatar
rickyfricky
Intermediate Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: XK x 2

Post by rickyfricky »

rickyfricky wrote:Here's where the plot thickens. The TRC on the FG reads model 4001.

And there was a letter from RIC (case candy) when I bought this, stating it's a 4001 manufactured in November of 1984.

Pix to follow.
Attachments
photo-7.JPG
photo-8.JPG
Watch those teeth, Marlin. I'm not sure we've properly sedated the beast . . .
User avatar
rickyfricky
Intermediate Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: XK x 2

Post by rickyfricky »

sloop_john_b wrote:Do the truss rods adjust from the body end or the headstock?
I think from the body, but I'd have to check.

I remember my tech in Boston commenting to his Dad (and business partner) that this bass was a bit of an oddball, in that it had characteristics of both a 4001 and a 4003. Was RIC changing over in this time period (1984)? And was there a bit of an overlap??
Watch those teeth, Marlin. I'm not sure we've properly sedated the beast . . .
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: XK x 2

Post by sloop_john_b »

Oh - it appears to have a non-shedua skunk stripe! 4001 it is!
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: XK x 2

Post by johnallg »

sloop_john_b wrote:Oh - it appears to have a non-shedua skunk stripe! 4001 it is!
And if the rods do adjust at the body end, an oddity indeed! Could it have been a factory experiment that got shipped? :shock:
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10932
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: XK x 2

Post by cjj »

johnallg wrote:
sloop_john_b wrote:Oh - it appears to have a non-shedua skunk stripe! 4001 it is!
And if the rods do adjust at the body end, an oddity indeed! Could it have been a factory experiment that got shipped? :shock:
Yes, interesting indeed! More pics would be great (pictures are ALWAYS great)!

It would be pretty easy to check the truss rod adjustments, just take the TRC off (easier than the pickguard). If it looks like this, it's got the early 4003 style swapped adjustment rods:
DSCN9700s.JPG
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: XK x 2

Post by bassduke49 »

I would venture a guess that it is in reality a 4003 that was mistakenly recorded as a 4001 (and hence described as such in the letter). If it has the twin slots in the headstock, adjusters at the body end of the neck, and no skunk stripe, those are all hallmarks of the early 4003. The one-piece pick guard and the "Model 4001" TRC could have been installed by mistake or may be replacements.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: XK x 2

Post by johnallg »

bassduke49 wrote:I would venture a guess that it is in reality a 4003 that was mistakenly recorded as a 4001 (and hence described as such in the letter). If it has the twin slots in the headstock, adjusters at the body end of the neck, and no skunk stripe, those are all hallmarks of the early 4003. The one-piece pick guard and the "Model 4001" TRC could have been installed by mistake or may be replacements.
Paul, look at the closeup of the headstock; there is a maple "skunk" stripe in the neck. 5-piece headstock.
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: XK x 2

Post by bassduke49 »

johnallg wrote: Paul, look at the closeup of the headstock; there is a maple "skunk" stripe in the neck. 5-piece headstock.

OK, that's one piece to indicate 4001. Let's check the truss channels.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: XK x 2

Post by ken_j »

The "S" bass will be neck through if it is a 4003S. A set net "S" bass would indicate a post '72 4001S.
rickyfricky wrote: ... Sorry I can't figure out how to post this facing the right direction . . .
Just turn it. :mrgreen:
photo-1.JPG
It really depends on your program. I use Picture Manager and I am able to turn, crop, and resize as necessary to post pics.
Last edited by ken_j on Fri Jan 25, 2013 2:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
rickyfricky
Intermediate Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: XK x 2

Post by rickyfricky »

bassduke49 wrote:
johnallg wrote:download/file.php?id=41599&mode=view
Paul, look at the closeup of the headstock; there is a maple "skunk" stripe in the neck. 5-piece headstock.

OK, that's one piece to indicate 4001. Let's check the truss channels.
Oh Captain My Captain!
Attachments
Got Stripe?
Got Stripe?
Fill it with oil and check the gas!
Fill it with oil and check the gas!
Watch those teeth, Marlin. I'm not sure we've properly sedated the beast . . .
User avatar
rickyfricky
Intermediate Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: XK x 2

Post by rickyfricky »

I think I see a stripe:
Attachments
Its Pedigree
Its Pedigree
Got Stripe?
Got Stripe?
Watch those teeth, Marlin. I'm not sure we've properly sedated the beast . . .
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”