DIY 4005

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
wim
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1486
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2003 1:37 am

Re: DIY 4005

Post by wim »

that tailpiece is top notch!
even better than the real thing, to quote some famous band.
I don't want to minimise his other achievements there, but the rest is nothing any good woodworker can't do really.

The real crafmanship is in the tone of the guitar.
But then again, Rics aren't D'Angelico's are they?
User avatar
T.A.R.
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1413
Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2010 9:39 am

Re: DIY 4005

Post by T.A.R. »

He did what he set out to do, I give him credit for producing what he wanted. I can't say that I haven't thought about building one but I have enough project in my boat to keep me busy.
User avatar
Hotzenplotz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:51 am

Re: DIY 4005

Post by Hotzenplotz »

+1 to Todd's comment. Six years means nothing when the project was 5 3/4 years untouched.


About this law discussion:
In free countries nobody will be condemned before committing a crime/ breaking the law. - This is a right like the copyright, too. In case of doubt even a more important right.

When a successor is trying to sell that one and that will break the law by doing that we are in a new game.
But my job is not to prejudge somebody for something he does not have done.

E.g. Martin offers DIY sets - just without the logo on the headstock. So that attitude is different. To have permanently an eye on copyright infringements is part of the game having a high end brand. I know what I am talking about - that is my job BTW.
Never forget: there is not just one way to handle all this copyright stuff.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: DIY 4005

Post by johnallg »

Hotzenplotz wrote:Never forget: there is not just one way to handle all this copyright stuff.
Like build and not brag..... :wink:

If it never sees the light of day outside a few local bars or your music room, who's to know. You could put your name on the TRC,also carve your faker statement in the instrument wood, thus forestalling anyone mistaking it for a real Rick after you pass. Many lust after a 4005, but JH has repeatedly said it is a no-go at RIC. I'm not advocating copying, I'm just saying.
User avatar
chrisdski
Intermediate Member
Posts: 676
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 4:15 pm

Re: DIY 4005

Post by chrisdski »

johnallg wrote: Many lust after a 4005, but JH has repeatedly said it is a no-go at RIC. I'm not advocating copying, I'm just saying.
What Ric should do is put out a redesigned hollow body bass. Something new, but with the classic overtones.
User avatar
pflash4001
Member
Posts: 449
Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2004 12:52 am
Contact:

Re: DIY 4005

Post by pflash4001 »

I understand that Ric isn't making the 4005 anymore, but WHY? What is it about the production of this gorgeous instrument that makes it impossible to produce again? Excuse my ignorance, but I don't know the backstory. I'd love a 4005, but first, I've never seen one in person, and second, if I cic, I'd never be able to afford one.
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: DIY 4005

Post by paologregorio »

The per unit cost of a 4005 would be more than most would pay...and the top horn looks like a donkey's willy.

The sound hole on the Mickenbacker is cartoonishly large and less appealing than the original.

I can't figure out why anyone would want a bass that looks like a toilet seat anyway. The 4005 is ugly. I own seven Rickenbackers. Give a me a 4001/4003/4004 any day.
If I wanted a hollowbody Rick bass, I'd spend the $, cannibalize a 4003 and a 381 or 330, and make one that actually looked pretty.
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
User avatar
BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS
Professional Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 11:58 pm

Re: DIY 4005

Post by BAD RONBO, KiLLeR DWaRfS »

4005 style with solidbody walnut wings, 4003 center section w/ classic headstock, large inlays and curent 4003 tailpiece with carve after it and no binding. would be less time consuming.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: DIY 4005

Post by rickenbrother »

paologregorio wrote:I can't figure out why anyone would want a bass that looks like a toilet seat anyway. The 4005 is ugly. Give a me a 4001/4003/4004 any day.
If I wanted a hollowbody Rick bass, I'd spend the $, cannibalize a 4003 and a 381 or 330, and make one that actually looked pretty.
+1!
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
37012player
Junior Member
Posts: 112
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:42 pm

Re: DIY 4005

Post by 37012player »

Player balance.....guitar body size and a full scale rick bass will not have what you need.
User avatar
paologregorio
Senior Member
Posts: 6376
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 12:56 pm
Contact:

Re: DIY 4005

Post by paologregorio »

37012player wrote:Player balance.....guitar body size and a full scale rick bass will not have what you need.
I am sure there are ways to make it balanced; sustain block in the heel end of the body, trim the headstock down to a guitar-shaped headstock, et cetera ... and even unbalanced, I would take it.
There is no reason to ever be bored.

...why yes, I suppose I do have a double bound guitar fetish...

"Uh, I like the double bounds. . . ."
User avatar
Hotzenplotz
Intermediate Member
Posts: 942
Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2010 8:51 am

Re: DIY 4005

Post by Hotzenplotz »

If I would be a bass player I would build a double bound 4005... :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: DIY 4005

Post by woodyng »

Like Paul said,the price for making one now like the classic one would make it too expensive to market. Plus,it seemed to be a low seller,which was why it was discontinued IIRC. If you really want one you can get a fairly close approximation with the Italia Rimini. (And it doesn't have the donkey's .....) :wink:
User avatar
Seans
Intermediate Member
Posts: 674
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:10 am

Re: DIY 4005

Post by Seans »

Hotzenplotz wrote:If I would be a bass player I would build a double bound 4005... :twisted: :twisted: :twisted:
Or a double neck :idea:
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: DIY 4005

Post by aceonbass »

I remember back in the early 80's that a local music store had a 4005 FG on the wall for over TWO YEARS! These just didn't sell. I had a '66 once, but it was almost bigger than me....which doesn't say much :wink:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”