NAMM 2013

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
rickyfricky
Intermediate Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by rickyfricky »

k43rover wrote:
fireglo67 wrote:Every year the NAMM thread comes along, and every year it gets ugly.

Carry on. :lol:

*Reaches for more popcorn*

Well done Rob, I reckon you are just about IBTL :lol:

I think this is the first NAMM thread I've commented on, and it's been a whole lot of fun so far (at least for me).

I'm already looking forward to next year's NAMM thread and I have a whole year to think up and execute new projects so there's actually something to discuss as I assume there will again be no new RIC product to talk about given John Hall's video comments.

By the way, as everyone seems very interested in model naming conventions, I am officially designating my two 1993's as model
1993/12SPCED2013WY....snappy eh? :wink:
Eddy -- you can make me a 4005 in Eggplant Glo for next year's NAMM thread if you're looking for projects. :wink:

I would humbly accept . . . 8)
Watch those teeth, Marlin. I'm not sure we've properly sedated the beast . . .
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by k43rover »

rickyfricky wrote:
Eddy -- you can make me a 4005 in Eggplant Glo for next year's NAMM thread if you're looking for projects. :wink:

I would humbly accept . . . 8)
Oh Mama...looks like I've opened Pandora's Box here! :lol: Next please as I need to come up with a top 5 short list to discuss with William.... :wink:
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by rickenbrother »

sloop_john_b wrote:
rickenbrother wrote:Okay boys, be nice! It would be nice to get back to the NAMM 2013 topic.
What is there to talk about? We covered the 350MC, you told us that wasn't the name of it, didn't follow up, and here we are.

So getting back on track, what's the name of it? :D
Geez John, with ALLLLLLLL your knowledge of guitars, I figured you'd be one of the first to figure exactly why it's not a 350MC. I'm disappointed in you! :P

As far as my statement in quotes in concerned, I just wanted the bickering to stop. You guys that want to continue to shoot flames, carry on. It won't be me that gives you the, "Time-out".
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by cassius987 »

I'm a bit boggled about how badly people want RIC to come up with something else "new" (in the form of... another 1960s reissue) to make them give them more of their money. Not saying it's wrong or right, I just don't get it myself.
User avatar
rickyfricky
Intermediate Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by rickyfricky »

cassius987 wrote:I'm a bit boggled about how badly people want RIC to come up with something else "new" (in the form of... another 1960s reissue) to make them give them more of their money. Not saying it's wrong or right, I just don't get it myself.

Excellent point Joshua.

Maybe for me it's about wanting what I can't have . . . :)
Watch those teeth, Marlin. I'm not sure we've properly sedated the beast . . .
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by sloop_john_b »

rickenbrother wrote:Geez John, with ALLLLLLLL your knowledge of guitars, I figured you'd be one of the first to figure exactly why it's not a 350MC. I'm disappointed in you! :P
I wasn't born with knowledge; in fact, I owe most of what I know about Rickenbackers to the members of this very forum, yourself included, who selflessly answered my stupid questions and freely shared information over the past seven years.

For the first time in YEARS, we have a potential new model from RIC that has many of us chomping at the bit for information. It's really cool that your privy to information that the rest of us pissants aren't, but next time, why don't you refrain from gloating about it?
rickenbrother wrote:This forum is based on good fellowship, kindness and sharing information.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by rickenbrother »

I gloated about it?! Oh geez! I should have stuck to my guns and never posted any pics. :roll:
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
RIC_FACTORY
RIC
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by RIC_FACTORY »

For what it's worth, we did finally sign on with a full fledged German distributor and transition over from Shinseido to Yamano in Japan which should increase business there. We have also discussed "special" models for France/Benelux since they have been often ignored. I should also point out that things are not entirely smooth with an important distributor in another crucial, but weak, market in Europe these days.

The 350V89 model? Well, the realization that MC has a sig model with someone else came as quite the last minute surprise to us (and was not what we were led to believe). Stay tuned.

I realize that RIC finally penetrating the German market and expanding a bit in the French is of no consequence to the folks that clamor to see a new re-issue or something else entirely new altogether. But, believe it or not, not everybody out there that has ever wanted to play or buy a boring old 330 has done so (you might say that we are still "spreading the gospel.") We are operating a relatively small, family owned manufacturing company based entirely in the USA in one of the most hostile business climates in the world--California. We live under heavy environmental regulations and are now under the shadow of Obamacare. This company has been in business for 82 years and we do what it takes to carry on. In this case, we've determined that expanding our brand into other (foreign) markets is what we need to do to survive. If we have to do that at the expense "new things" for collectors and enthusiasts that are bored with our line, then the criticism we take from folks on this and other forums is the price we have to pay.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by sloop_john_b »

Thanks for the update Ben.
User avatar
bitzerguy
RRF Consultant
Posts: 1678
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 10:22 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by bitzerguy »

Well spoken Ben. That seems to run in the family! Here's to another 82 plus years through intelligent, well planned moves coupled with the small business/family values you embrace. Many of us appreciate that on a level that cannot be expressed on a forum.

Now about that 350V89... if your looking for someone to sign it... :D The Dean Signature model. Err... wait...
That guitar is the hottest thing to come from Ric since, well... the new Ruby! Oh yeah, and all those spectacular one offs that keep popping up. :mrgreen:
I'm a fan.
...Dean
Never, ever drool on your surf shirt. It wrecks the solo.

660/12FG, 350V63/6FG, 620/6JG, 360WB/6DBG, Dingwall C1 #001, Prestige Heritage Elite FM
RIC_FACTORY
RIC
Posts: 508
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 7:00 pm

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by RIC_FACTORY »

The neck is something else, screams 12 string model... I decided to bring it at the last second so the local forum members could check it out and I could get some feedback. I will let them speak to that. Those "MC" models were built in a haste right after Thanksgiving to have done before Christmas and I am extremely proud of the effort our people put forward to meet the deadline.

As much as I would love to leave the monotany of our current lineup and do a proper RM re-issue and perhaps 5 string bass model, I really enjoy the fact that people in previously unserviced regions will finally have access to our guitars. I also look forward to the special models for France and Benelux, we have yet to figure that one out, but once we do, it will happen fast.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by jps »

RIC_FACTORY wrote:As much as I would love to leave the monotany of our current lineup and do a proper RM re-issue and perhaps 5 string bass model, I really enjoy the fact that people in previously unserviced regions will finally have access to our guitars.
This is great news! 8)

Belated Happy Birthday, Ben! :D
User avatar
cassius987
Senior Member
Posts: 4723
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 2:11 pm

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by cassius987 »

RIC_FACTORY wrote:5 string bass model
Cool! Paul W. might have some helpful suggestions after working on my bass.
User avatar
epitreture
Member
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:35 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by epitreture »

RIC_FACTORY wrote: We are operating a relatively small, family owned manufacturing company based entirely in the USA in one of the most hostile business climates in the world--California. We live under heavy environmental regulations and are now under the shadow of Obamacare.
RIC would certainly be welcome in Texas, a very friendly business climate. :)
If there isn't a 12 string Rickenbacker playing at my funeral, I'm leaving.
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by johnhall »

epitreture wrote:RIC would certainly be welcome in Texas, a very friendly business climate. :)
We've looked there before. Too many rattlesnakes. At least here we can see the two-legged ones crawling up from a distance.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”