Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
Dom
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:22 am

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by Dom »

Clint wrote:My '87 620 is pretty beat up. Lots of deep dings and scratches all over it. But it's Jetglo, so from more than 5 feet away it still looks all shiny and new.
You are sure right about Jetglo Clint, it hides imperfections well. Kenny & I traded & I now have a '91 Jetglo 330 with some finish issues. This sucker plays & sounds great and has earned the name Battle Axe. Only problem now is my turquoise 330 is getting jealous! I may swap in the fiber top HiGains that were on my '88 WB & see how it likes 'em.
Clint
Intermediate Member
Posts: 727
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 2:03 pm

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by Clint »

I love a story with a happy ending.
Jangle, Chime & Twang.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by jps »

Dom wrote:You are sure right about Jetglo Clint, it hides imperfections well.
That's why TC loves JG. 8)
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by sloop_john_b »

jps wrote:
Dom wrote:You are sure right about Jetglo Clint, it hides imperfections well.
That's why TC loves JG. 8)
TC? Did you mean MC? Mike Campbell?
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by ken_j »

sloop_john_b wrote:
jps wrote:
Dom wrote:You are sure right about Jetglo Clint, it hides imperfections well.
That's why TC loves JG. 8)
TC? Did you mean MC? Mike Campbell?
Probably Tony.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
fluffy
Intermediate Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:19 am

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by fluffy »

I haven't exactly babied my 4003 or 650C. I wouldn't go as far as calling them "beaters " but it's a far cry from being "case queens". Resale value is of no importance to me because i don't plan on selling them.
♪♫♪♫I need new strings, these ones have a bunch of dang wrong notes on 'em ♫♪♫♪


http://www.reverbnation.com/#!/thesubtleties
User avatar
Dom
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:22 am

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by Dom »

fluffy wrote:I haven't exactly babied my 4003 or 650C. I wouldn't go as far as calling them "beaters " but it's a far cry from being "case queens". Resale value is of no importance to me because i don't plan on selling them.
I feel the same way about my Ricks and a few others and all the keepers get played. The binding on my WB has fended off many a slip with the slide, still, my WB is my first & favorite and has always commanded my respect so dings on it do tick me off. The other guitars I have had over the years are a different story. Their position is always tenuous since I can get rid of them to make room for more Ricks! I have already played the balls off this jetglo.

Although the relic movement to me is a complete hypocritical joke, there is certainly something to be said about a guitar, any guitar that has rightfully earned it's patina in the line of duty and no new guitar can compete with a comfortable worn in neck which still can't be faked. Since I had one as my first guitar I bought a Vantage Avenger last year that had electronics removed then stuck in a closet and not been played since it was new in 1982. It just doesn't feel as nice as my well worn & gone first guitar did back in '91 as that guitar had been first guitar for several different people by the time I got my stupid hands on it.
User avatar
Dom
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:22 am

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by Dom »

Speaking of hypocrisy, though I dislike the relic movement I'm considering doing a Rory Gallagher cover band and out of respect I just can't do that with a new looking guitar. I already have a worn in neck & strat body from a squire that I've had since '97 that was stripped before I got it with an oiled finish and I'd also be blocking the trem & such.
User avatar
fluffy
Intermediate Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 7:19 am

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by fluffy »

Dom wrote:Speaking of hypocrisy, though I dislike the relic movement I'm considering doing a Rory Gallagher cover band and out of respect I just can't do that with a new looking guitar. I already have a worn in neck & strat body from a squire that I've had since '97 that was stripped before I got it with an oiled finish and I'd also be blocking the trem & such.
there's a difference between relic'd and absolutely played to death like Rory's Strat :lol: :lol:
♪♫♪♫I need new strings, these ones have a bunch of dang wrong notes on 'em ♫♪♫♪


http://www.reverbnation.com/#!/thesubtleties
User avatar
Dom
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:22 am

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by Dom »

fluffy wrote: there's a difference between relic'd and absolutely played to death like Rory's Strat :lol: :lol:
Then there is just death...in a Rory documentary Johnny Marr talks about lighting his guitar on fire in shop class to look like Rory's strat! Most of my play hours are on my 370WB but since it is built to last it still shows little wear.
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by k43rover »

Dom wrote: Most of my play hours are on my 370WB but since it is built to last it still shows little wear.
You're bang on there. Some of these 370 WB beaters are well over the 40 year mark and still look box fresh....
Attachments
Beater 370 WB.JPG
User avatar
Dom
Member
Posts: 347
Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:22 am

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by Dom »

Yeah, my turquoise 330 has dings galore on the front edge but the FG WB just fends them off or hides them well. I'm seriously considering a tortoise shell pickguard for the turquoise just like on my LPB strat. Worn in vintage LPB guitars seem to have a lot of mojo, saw tons of pictures of them looking for ideas when I was rebuilding my strat last year. Good thing too 'cause my turquoise 330 is a keeper so it has many more dings in its future. That one is the cleanest sounding guitar I have, but it also has a mean side. Like it was born angry, but it has manners.

My WB looks similar to that FG 12 since I put the toaster tops over the HB-1's. Curious about how the controls on that one work. Second switch for the mid pu?
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by k43rover »

Dom wrote: Curious about how the controls on that one work. Second switch for the mid pu?
Explained here (the last post is correct):

viewtopic.php?f=13&t=392691

This guitar has the "factory Byrd" wiring which was offered as an option in the late '60's (and possibly even through early '70's as there is an authenticated factory example from 1972 owned by a forumite). AFAIK all the other known original factory examples with this wiring are NS, so it's possible this OS example is a unique configuration. This factory '60's wiring is completely distinct from the various guitars with in-built compressors (either of the McGuinn DIY variety or the much later RM signature LE's)

This is how the pots are wired, and this is confirmed as a factory standard harness by ex-employees who worked at RIC when they were still making 'em:
Attachments
Byrd Cavity 1.JPG
User avatar
kennyhowes
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 5022
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2001 1:03 am
Contact:

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by kennyhowes »

k43rover wrote:This guitar has the "factory Byrd" wiring which was offered as an option in the late '60's (and possibly even through early '70's as there is an authenticated factory example from 1972 owned by a forumite).
My 370/12 was made in '81 and came with Byrd wiring.
User avatar
k43rover
Intermediate Member
Posts: 1133
Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:07 pm

Re: Beater Rickenbackers Anyone?

Post by k43rover »

kennyhowes wrote:
k43rover wrote:This guitar has the "factory Byrd" wiring which was offered as an option in the late '60's (and possibly even through early '70's as there is an authenticated factory example from 1972 owned by a forumite).
My 370/12 was made in '81 and came with Byrd wiring.
:shock: That's a turn up for the books! No sign of your guitar in the register - the newest one in there is the '72 I mentioned earlier. Are you sure the wiring was factory installed or could it be a retrofit? As it's an '81, presumably it's a 24 fret or did they have a left over 21 fret body for it too? If it's all original and 24 fret then that could be a unique config! 8)
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”