NAMM 2013

General Rickenbacker discussion

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

JANGRO
New member
Posts: 9
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:55 pm

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by JANGRO »

"(and I think less in England, based upon what I read in this forum)"
Threatening to take your ball away again John?

Arrogance and insecurity...what a combination.
fireglo67

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by fireglo67 »

JANGRO wrote:
"(and I think less in England, based upon what I read in this forum)"
Threatening to take your ball away again John?

Arrogance and insecurity...what a combination.
Where did this f'king troll spring up from? :roll:
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by sloop_john_b »

JANGRO wrote: Threatening to take your ball away again John?

Arrogance and insecurity...what a combination.
Finally some civility in this thread and then you show up. fracking dipshit. Why don't you send him a PM? Hah, doubtful.
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by godber »

JANGRO wrote:
"(and I think less in England, based upon what I read in this forum)"
Threatening to take your ball away again John?

Arrogance and insecurity...what a combination.
Who cares mate? Really?
User avatar
LenMinNJ
Intermediate Member
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:08 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by LenMinNJ »

aceonbass wrote:
LenMinNJ wrote:I'd like one each of a 350V89, and a 350SH-Spec and JBLE-prototype guitars, plus a 3503 bass (a 350-style body bass with triangle fretboard inlays and double binding). Thanks to one great luthier I'll soon have two of those, and in not too long, a third. I only wish that Rickenbacker could somehow call them their own.
Does this mean that you have a luthier who is modifying Rickenbacker guitars to meet your specs, or that he is building these instruments from scratch?
We're starting with period-correct Rickenbacker guitars. Some parts have to be built from scratch.
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by aceonbass »

LenMinNJ wrote:We're starting with period-correct Rickenbacker guitars. Some parts have to be built from scratch.
That's the approach that makes more sense, and the one I take myself. Hey, at least it's still a RIC.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by johnallg »

johnhall wrote:
epitreture wrote:RIC would certainly be welcome in Texas, a very friendly business climate. :)
We've looked there before. Too many rattlesnakes. At least here we can see the two-legged ones crawling up from a distance.
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: .......
User avatar
ken_j
RRF Consultant
Posts: 4216
Joined: Fri Jul 18, 2003 5:31 am
Contact:

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by ken_j »

redamber wrote:
I live in the UK, but as a citizen of the European community, I can buy a guitar in Germany, France, Belgium or wherever just as easily as I can elsewhere in the EU - no limits on trade, no additional VAT (sales tax) or Duty payable - which is the whole point of the 'Common Market'. So, if the Ric Corp start to produce 'special models' for France & Benelux, I and other UK residents will simply buy these direct from the relevant EU dealers, at the expense of the UK dealer network
Although I am nowhere familiar with the laws in any of these countries mentioned, or of RIC's distibutor agreement, I would have to assume that they may have similar restrictions as to where they can sell. For example the dealer agreements for North America do not permit selling outside of North America, otherwise US dealers would be shipping new product to Europe and OZ. I would think any distributor would want some assurance that they have a protected territory. Of course this is all speculation on my part. It would be nice to think that those in the UK and elsewhere in Europe could buy specials made for a particular distibutor.
"The best things in life aren't things."
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by jps »

scotty wrote:
ajish4 wrote:Freaking guitarists ALWAYS get the new toys! ;) ;) ;) :lol: :lol: :lol:
Thats because were better than the bass players :twisted:
Delusional, too, I see! :mrgreen:
User avatar
cjj
RRF Moderator
Posts: 10931
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2008 6:17 pm
Contact:

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by cjj »

OK, getting back to NAMM 2013....

Here's some videos posted by a guy on another forum I frequent. Kinda shows what NAMM is all about (I'll have to take his word for it 'cause I've never been there):

1 of 3: http://youtu.be/Ubep7WNXDgo
2 of 3: http://youtu.be/CZG1mpFPnGc
3 of 3: http://youtu.be/QJU5oBtFcLM

No RIC content that I noticed though, but he has a slide show that at least shows the RIC booth...
http://youtu.be/iizjKQrB2tI
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37496
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by jps »

cjj wrote:OK, getting back to NAMM 2013....

Here's some videos posted by a guy on another forum I frequent. Kinda shows what NAMM is all about (I'll have to take his word for it 'cause I've never been there):

1 of 3: http://youtu.be/Ubep7WNXDgo
2 of 3: http://youtu.be/CZG1mpFPnGc
3 of 3: http://youtu.be/QJU5oBtFcLM

No RIC content that I noticed though, but he has a slide show that at least shows the RIC booth...
http://youtu.be/iizjKQrB2tI
They must have toned down the volume considerably to be able to actually isolate those performances from the din of the show! :shock:
User avatar
LenMinNJ
Intermediate Member
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:08 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by LenMinNJ »

aceonbass wrote:
LenMinNJ wrote:We're starting with period-correct Rickenbacker guitars. Some parts have to be built from scratch.
That's the approach that makes more sense, and the one I take myself. Hey, at least it's still a RIC.
I don't know if it's still a Rickenbacker.

You know the old story about Noah's hammer, the ohe he used to build the ark? He passed it down to his descendents and they still have it today.

But after a while the handle wore out, so they made a new one.

And eventually the hammer head bent and broke, so they replaced it with a new one.

But they still have grandfather Noah's hammer, right?

I'm certain that the guys at the Rickenbacker factory would look at my guitars and say: we may have built most of those parts, including the serial number plates and the TRCs, but we sure didn't build *that* guitar, even though we could've!
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by aceonbass »

I'm not so sure Len. I've done a lot of RIC customs. People who see or own them still think of them as RICs.
User avatar
rickenbrother
RRF Moderator
Posts: 13194
Joined: Sun May 26, 2002 5:00 am

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by rickenbrother »

If it were up to me, someone here wouldn't make it to post #10.
JETGLO should officially be renamed JETGLO ROCKS! :-)
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: NAMM 2013

Post by johnallg »

cjj wrote:OK, getting back to NAMM 2013....

Here's some videos posted by a guy on another forum I frequent. Kinda shows what NAMM is all about (I'll have to take his word for it 'cause I've never been there):

1 of 3: http://youtu.be/Ubep7WNXDgo
2 of 3: http://youtu.be/CZG1mpFPnGc
3 of 3: http://youtu.be/QJU5oBtFcLM

No RIC content that I noticed though, but he has a slide show that at least shows the RIC booth...
http://youtu.be/iizjKQrB2tI
After viewing, it begs the question, when is RIC going to make a 7 or 8 string bass?? :twisted:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker General: by Howard Bishop”