Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

fireglo67

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by fireglo67 »

johnhall wrote:It's not a matter of units. We have all the business we need.
Would the production time on these be similar to existing models?
If so, as all the hard work has already been done, I guess it would be fairly straight forward just to add them into your production schedule, should you ever decide to do so?
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by johnhall »

fireglo67 wrote:
johnhall wrote:It's not a matter of units. We have all the business we need.
Would the production time on these be similar to existing models?
If so, as all the hard work has already been done, I guess it would be fairly straight forward just to add them into your production schedule, should you ever decide to do so?
Yes, it would be very easy to add to the line. But we're not sure we wish to do so under the circumstances.
User avatar
LenMinNJ
Intermediate Member
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:08 am

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by LenMinNJ »

johnhall wrote:There's nothing reworked about it. We did completely new, full CNC programming for this instrument, both body and neck. Even more the shame should we decide not to produce it.
That's probably a serious investment, so I'd guess that you had plans to bring it into production sooner or later.

Has Mike Campbell's decision to allow Duesenberg to produce another signature model affected your planning?

I hope that you decide to produce them sometime soon.
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by sloop_john_b »

I wouldn't worry Len - even though the 350v89 will likely meet the same fate as the 650JB, you seem to have a knack for figuring out how to get 'em anyway! :)
condo
New member
Posts: 71
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2004 6:00 am

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by condo »

The black jb looks thicker than the green one. Illusion? So I read In another thread that the wiring was pretty neat, and varied as they designed the brown model. Is there (a link or) resource where I can read about the different jb wiring schemes?


My 2 cents. ... I would not sacrifice a 350 for either project. The 24 fret Liverpool is kind of a rare beast. I would procure a used 650, and use the nice wide neck. If you want the standard neck buy a 330 or 610. The 650s and 330s are less expensive (used) and have 24 fret necks. If you want the R tail piece take it off your 350 and put a bigsby on it and then sell it.
Electrostring wrote:Took me ages to find this picture again... lower right shows the Browne guitars

Image
User avatar
LenMinNJ
Intermediate Member
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:08 am

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by LenMinNJ »

condo wrote:I would procure a used 650, and use the nice wide neck. If you want the standard neck buy a 330 or 610. The 650s and 330s are less expensive (used) and have 24 fret necks.
The 650 has a wide neck but it's a neck-through design rather than a glued-in neck. Its recessed pickups and modern bridge makes the height of the fretboard off the body different than the 330/350 series. The neck heel is also carved in a way that's not like the 330/350s.

The 330 has a narrow neck, as you noted. It also has dark wood wings on its headstock, which doesn't matter for a Jetglo guitar, but would for a guitar that is to have a headstock that is all light wood.

The 610's neck is also neck-though.
If you want the R tail piece take it off your 350 and put a bigsby on it and then sell it.
Yup! (Or your 330.)
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by electrofaro »

condo wrote:The black jb looks thicker than the green one. Illusion? So I read In another thread that the wiring was pretty neat, and varied as they designed the brown model. Is there (a link or) resource where I can read about the different jb wiring schemes?
I think you're right and the black one is thicker... semi-hollow maybe?
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
User avatar
johnhall
RIC
Posts: 3926
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2000 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by johnhall »

condo wrote:The black jb looks thicker than the green one. Illusion? So I read In another thread that the wiring was pretty neat, and varied as they designed the brown model. Is there (a link or) resource where I can read about the different jb wiring schemes?
All are the same thickness, all are solid bodies.

There were six different wiring/pickup schemes tested as I recall but for the moment don't recall where I recorded that info. The schemes did involve humbuckers, hi gain single coils, and some reverse wound variations to allow some humbucking arrangements of single coils.
User avatar
vulcan_creedler
Member
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:12 am

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by vulcan_creedler »

johnhall wrote:The schemes did involve humbuckers, hi gain single coils, and some reverse wound variations to allow some humbucking arrangements of single coils.
The HB1 humbuckers (in my humble opinion) are among the best things that have come out of Rickenbacker in recent years! Incredibly versatile (if you're into hot wiring) but just a fabulous sound - especially on my 4003! I'd hazard a guess that they outperform some of the pickups (mentioning no names) that are supplied by the renowned pickup manufacturers.
"Infamy, Infamy, They've all got it in for me" - Kenneth Williams


1988 JG 4003
User avatar
electrofaro
Senior Member
Posts: 3611
Joined: Sun Apr 26, 2009 3:25 pm

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by electrofaro »

johnhall wrote:All are the same thickness, all are solid bodies.
Well, that's cleared then :D
'67 Fender Coronado II CAB * '17 1963 ES-335 PB * currently rickless
campbellfan
New member
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:09 pm

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by campbellfan »

Has anyone heard any updates on the 350v89 possibly being released? Any new info available? I hope it becomes a reality!!!! :)
User avatar
LenMinNJ
Intermediate Member
Posts: 739
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 12:08 am

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by LenMinNJ »

No news yet. We're *all* waiting to hear!
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by JakeK »

johnhall wrote:There are no immediate plans to do so and I really don't know what the future will bring on this one.
campbellfan
New member
Posts: 26
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:09 pm

Re: Mike Campbell's 350 - Neck Width?

Post by campbellfan »

LenMinNJ wrote:No news yet. We're *all* waiting to hear!
Thanks for the insight LenMinNJ. :) Much appreciated.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”