This is a photo of the headstock of a Rickenbacker guitar, supposedly a Combo 1000, manufactured in 1962.
Yet, on the basis of the Bacon & Day and other reference books, it seems that Rickenbacker was using the curved & pointed TRC (as designed by Lydia Catherine Hall, mother of John Hall) from at least the mid-1950s. Certainly, all the pics of Combo models which I have seen on the net have the modern TRC design.
Does anyone on the Forum have an explanation, or should I assume that the guitar and its TRC are suspect?
Old Style TRC - correct or not?
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
Old Style TRC - correct or not?
Santa visits only once a year, but Santa Ana delivers Rics all year round.
Re: Old Style TRC - correct or not?
I have heard, on this forum, that the stamped metal plates were used in 1959-61 on various models including the 1000, so 1962 is probably not out of the question either given that the only absolute about Rickenbackers is that there are no absolutes...
I have NO idea what to do with those skinny stringed things... I'm just a bass player...
Re: Old Style TRC - correct or not?
...absolutely.
- Ontario_RIC_fan
- Advanced Member
- Posts: 2797
- Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 8:39 pm
Re: Old Style TRC - correct or not?
James - the only way to date the guitar is by its serial number, which will be stamped on the bridge plate. The TRC looks correct for a guitar made between 1959 and 1961.redamber wrote:This is a photo of the headstock of a Rickenbacker guitar, supposedly a Combo 1000, manufactured in 1962.
By 1962 they had plastic TRCS. You can track this in the register. I would suspect your guitar is earlier then you think it is.
Brian Morton
A Rickenbacker Fan
in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
=========================
67 FG 625
74 JG 4000
76 JG 430
77 JG 620
77 JG 320
79 MG 450
79 JG 4001
80 FG 620/12
81 BG 480
91 JG 610
02 BG 620
78 TR7
83 TR25
A Rickenbacker Fan
in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
=========================
67 FG 625
74 JG 4000
76 JG 430
77 JG 620
77 JG 320
79 MG 450
79 JG 4001
80 FG 620/12
81 BG 480
91 JG 610
02 BG 620
78 TR7
83 TR25
- deaconblues
- RRF Consultant
- Posts: 2390
- Joined: Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:14 pm
Re: Old Style TRC - correct or not?
It could absolutely be authentic.
Ask for a photo of the headstock with the TRC removed. If there's an extra screw hole, the cover's been changed.
Ask for a photo of the headstock with the TRC removed. If there's an extra screw hole, the cover's been changed.
Re: Old Style TRC - correct or not?
Thank you all for your expert responses.
On the basis of what I now know, it would seem to be authentic. The Serial No. appears to be BJ 511, indicating that the guitar was manufactured in October 1962 - consistent with what is on the Register. The remainder of the body, including the lower & upper bout of the 'tulip', look about the right shape for the period (see pic).
I don't want to ask what's under the TRC until I'm sure I have an interest - and that depends on whether the seller adjusts his price from where he is at present. Work in progress!
On the basis of what I now know, it would seem to be authentic. The Serial No. appears to be BJ 511, indicating that the guitar was manufactured in October 1962 - consistent with what is on the Register. The remainder of the body, including the lower & upper bout of the 'tulip', look about the right shape for the period (see pic).
I don't want to ask what's under the TRC until I'm sure I have an interest - and that depends on whether the seller adjusts his price from where he is at present. Work in progress!
Santa visits only once a year, but Santa Ana delivers Rics all year round.
