Geddy Lee's first Jetglo 4001
Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4
-
loendmaestro
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 1495
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:53 pm
- Contact:
- loverickbass
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 5:00 am
I knew he had 2 jetglos but I didn't know he had one pre '73. I've never seen a pic of that one.
Cole
BTW, I have a few Steinbergers in my collection and they are built like tanks. IMO they aren't junk. They are great little basses. Mucho growl and deep deep bass,yes a little weird and futuristic and not for everyone. OK, carry on with the Geddy thread. I'm not trying to be offensive in any way.
Cole
BTW, I have a few Steinbergers in my collection and they are built like tanks. IMO they aren't junk. They are great little basses. Mucho growl and deep deep bass,yes a little weird and futuristic and not for everyone. OK, carry on with the Geddy thread. I'm not trying to be offensive in any way.
- atomic_punk
- Senior Member
- Posts: 5093
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2003 5:00 am
- Contact:
The pre-73 he is pictured with was not his "main touring bass", notice it still has the Ric Bridge on it. Most of the pictures the Ric is in show a Badass and a non-full-width inlay. I believe that picture is from the "Fly by Night" tour of 1974. He might have picked up a "new" one along the way. JMO
"They make great f***'n basses". - Lemmy, NAMM 2009
Chris, that may be the pic I'm thinking of..I thought the bass had a toaster neck pickup too, it's been a long time since I've seen the album. I could be totally wrong about that early 4001, I apologize. It looks as though the bass could be dated to mid '73 at the earliest, I would say that this was his first Rickenbacker bass in this pic.
I don't mean to be harsh about Steinbergers, they have just always seemed flat to me in terms of sound, and yes it's a subjective analysis. As a bass player, I would reach for something else.
They certainly have played a key part in the evolution of the electric bass; I just found it odd at the time that Geddy made this choice over a Rickenbacker. IMO changing to the Wal was a new sunrise for Geddy, and I think you can hear a change in his approach to playing bass when he switched.
I DO miss the Rickenbacker, though I don't think he'll go back.
Geddy himself has said (to paraphrase)"...I don't see what the fascination is about people wanting me to play the Rickenbacker...."
I don't mean to be harsh about Steinbergers, they have just always seemed flat to me in terms of sound, and yes it's a subjective analysis. As a bass player, I would reach for something else.
They certainly have played a key part in the evolution of the electric bass; I just found it odd at the time that Geddy made this choice over a Rickenbacker. IMO changing to the Wal was a new sunrise for Geddy, and I think you can hear a change in his approach to playing bass when he switched.
I DO miss the Rickenbacker, though I don't think he'll go back.
Geddy himself has said (to paraphrase)"...I don't see what the fascination is about people wanting me to play the Rickenbacker...."
- loverickbass
- Veteran RRF member
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Mon Jul 29, 2002 5:00 am
-
jwr2
-
loendmaestro
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 1495
- Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2003 12:53 pm
- Contact:
I guess it's just nostalgia. Geddy is the main reason I got a Rick. The old Exit Stage Left tour film with the 'way too much' red lighting - that did it for me. The sound, the technique, the visual.
I've never owned a Steinberger & they may be fine basses, but aesthetically speaking, a 4001 looks better than a toaster on a stick.
I've never owned a Steinberger & they may be fine basses, but aesthetically speaking, a 4001 looks better than a toaster on a stick.

