(We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progress)

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2781
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by henry5 »

I tell you what Dane, I'd be happy to buy several sets; you know, just in case suddenly somebody gives me a bunch of '72s. 8)

Pete, I suspect you're right regarding the influence of both the tail and saddles. Which leads me to wonder what the best-sounding metal (obviously subjective) for a Ric saddle would be.
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by walker »

It would be interesting to hear some sound tests with tailpiece/bridge assemblies made from different metals (or plastics, even) to see just how they affect the tone, and if the difference is even discernable.
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by teeder »

I'm in the "aluminum sounds better" camp.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2781
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by henry5 »

walker wrote:It would be interesting to hear some sound tests with tailpiece/bridge assemblies made from different metals (or plastics, even) to see just how they affect the tone, and if the difference is even discernable.
I've done this with pickups etc before, but never bridges. I have to agree it would indeed be interesting.
User avatar
henry5
Advanced Member
Posts: 2781
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 6:00 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by henry5 »

teeder wrote:I'm in the "aluminum sounds better" camp.
Well my favourite ever Ric has an aluminium tail with zinc saddles so I guess I'm in both camps. :) I think you'd have to try different bridges on the same bass to really get a conclusive answer.....except of course the same combination might not work best on the next bass, not to mention people may have different preferences anyway (the friend who now owns my '76 thinks it sounds better than my main '72, whereas I don't think it's even close).

Anyway, sorry Mark, back to your thread!
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by walker »

HA HA! It's all good - it'll be awhile before I have anything new to post. What to anticipate next: The RM refin'd and playable!
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by walker »

...playable with the exception of a few frets here & there. I'm thinking the refret will be the last step.
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by walker »

One thing I'll miss about playing it as-is is the smell of the freshly sanded Rosewood fretboard and headstock. I never knew how Cedary the wood smelled.
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37498
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by jps »

henry5 wrote:Which leads me to wonder what the best-sounding metal (obviously subjective) for a Ric saddle would be.
Interesting, usually it is the other way round:

"Which Rick is best for Metal?" :lol:
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by walker »

HA HA! Nice! And a very good question...
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by walker »

Lemmy presents a compelling argument for both the 4001 and 4004LK:



Colonel Sanders
Intermediate Member
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:39 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by Colonel Sanders »

walker wrote:HA HA! It's all good - it'll be awhile before I have anything new to post. What to anticipate next: The RM refin'd and playable!
So... You've sprayed it yet?
1973 4001 Jetglo
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by walker »

Nope. Will post when it's done.
User avatar
pag
Intermediate Member
Posts: 515
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 8:37 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by pag »

By the way, when I watched the recent Chris Squire rig rundown video,his bridge looked like
the E and A string saddles were zinc...could be a trick of the light but there was no sheen
as on the D and G strings to my eyes.

I definitely want to see an aluminium unit available again.
Surely its not that difficult to produce a redesigned mould for both zinc and ally versions for all us tone freaks?
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by teeder »

I definitely want to see an aluminium unit available again.
Surely its not that difficult to produce a redesigned mould for both zinc and ally versions for all us tone freaks?
I've looked into an actual sand-cast pattern & mold for producing aluminum TP's, but couldn't get the A-OK from Mr. Hall.

The price was surprisingly reasonable.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”