(We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progress)

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by walker »

Thanks a lot guys - I feel pretty good about what I managed here, and subsequently this bass is one that I'm particularly proud of, considering the time & effort it took to get it where it is. It's also a big relief to finally get it done. I may have "balls of steel", as Wim pointed out, but that gets to be draining after awhile... as it were. :lol:

Kevin - thanks for noticing the under-shading. That was a little tricky to pull off. I also did it under the nameplate and tailpiece. 8)
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by johnallg »

There it is all in a nutshell. Long arduous journey, but worth the effort. No?

Very nice, Mark.
JakeK
RRF Consultant
Posts: 5757
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:08 pm

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by JakeK »

johnallg wrote:There it is all in a nutshell. Long arduous journey, but worth the effort. No?

Very nice, Mark.
+1, good show!

Does this bass have the thinnest neck in your collection?
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by walker »

Thanks again, guys!

The RM has by far the thinnest neck in my collection, even noticeably more than the '68. It's no wonder Squire played like a maniac.
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4886
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

(We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by 8mileshigher »

walker wrote:...but that gets to be draining after awhile... as it were. :lol:
No pun intended, eh ? ? :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by walker »

Oh, totally intended, for which I apologize nothing. :D
User avatar
8mileshigher
Senior Member
Posts: 4886
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 12:34 pm

(We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progress)

Post by 8mileshigher »

:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by johnallg »

No pun in ten did......
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by walker »

OK - here's the RM 1999 audio test drive video. I compared it side-by-side with the '68 4001 for comparison. Apologies ahead of time - I didn't think to solo the pickups during the test run.



For this audio test, both basses were run through the same amp, an SWR SM-400 head & ADA MB1 preamp through a 4x12 Hiwatt cab set at the same gain & volume, same mic placement, and no additional EQ or compression when mixed. Three signals were used - a close mic on the cab, the cheap mic on the video camera for the ambient sound, and the line out from the amp. Both basses were set with the volume and tone full up.

Excerpts from these songs were played. Or paraphrased. Or I just made tish up where I didn't really know the song. With all examples, the '68 4001 is played first, then the RM 1999.

1. Starship Trooper - Yes
2. Starship Trooper pt 3: Wurm - Yes
3. By Crooked Steps - Soundgarden
4. Paralllells - Yes
5. Blackened Mirrors - Walker (that's me)
6. America - (Yes version)
7. 15/8 riff - Walker
8. Clair de Lune
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by jps »

It sounds like a Jazz Bass.................














JK :mrgreen:
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by jps »

The 4001 is meatier sounding, making it seem as though you are using a cap bypassed HS PU Han solo'd in the RM. Do you hear that difference from the amp(s)?
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by walker »

The horseshoe pickup in the RM is louder than the HS in the 4001 and subsequently is more noticeable in the pickup mix with all volume & tone full on.
User avatar
inhuien
Junior Member
Posts: 144
Joined: Sat Jun 03, 2006 1:53 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by inhuien »

Both basses sound wonderful but the RM is my fav, I'd love to hear it played without a pick. Great vid. :)
User avatar
antonius
Member
Posts: 256
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 6:15 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by antonius »

They both sound amazing!! Amaxing playing too. You really know how to make a Rickenbacker sing Mark. Thanks for posting. 8)
User avatar
Ashgray
Intermediate Member
Posts: 545
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 6:14 am

Re: (We now join this RM 1999 restoration already in progres

Post by Ashgray »

Great sounds and great playing!

Clearly they are both superb instruments but I prefer the RM - it seems to have a little more edge and bite to my ears.

Ash
1976 4001 "Shadow" Fretless
1978 4002 Walnut
1986 4008 Silver
1999 4001 V63 White
2012 4004 Jetglo

_____________________

Button 6 String Fretfull
Button 6 String Fretless
NS CR5 Omni Bass Fretless
Ashbory Bass
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”