The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

User avatar
congerz83
Intermediate Member
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:14 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by congerz83 »

eddied wrote:Thought I'd show eveyone my pride and joy. It is an actual picture taken by me @ The Boston Garden during the Wings Across America Tour. A really nice stage roadie allowed me to get up close and take a picture of the HOLY GRAIL Paul's 4001S. I will never forget the night. Check it out.
Boston garden 76.jpg
THAT is totally AWESOME!
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
User avatar
bassduke49
Senior Member
Posts: 6580
Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 5:00 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by bassduke49 »

There is a high-res double-page spread image of McCartney's Rick in my book. I describe it as how it looks "today" but the shot is at least 10 years old. I suspect nothing has changed on it since the photo was taken. A good comparison of McCartney's Rick and a lefty C64S can be made with the book as well.
Author: "The Rickenbacker Electric Bass - 50 Years As Rock's Bottom"
User avatar
congerz83
Intermediate Member
Posts: 750
Joined: Tue Jul 04, 2006 5:14 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by congerz83 »

bassduke49 wrote:There is a high-res double-page spread image of McCartney's Rick in my book. I describe it as how it looks "today" but the shot is at least 10 years old. I suspect nothing has changed on it since the photo was taken. A good comparison of McCartney's Rick and a lefty C64S can be made with the book as well.
There certainly is Paul! I guess I'll take this opportunity to tell you it was YOUR book with the comparisons that was part of the inspiration for this project.
LET THE WORLD KNOW YOU WANT PAUL TO BRING BACK THE 4001. JOIN OUR FACEBOOK GROUP!! http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=147641915268984
User avatar
aceonbass
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 6651
Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2002 5:00 am
Contact:

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by aceonbass »

I'm quite surprised that no one seems to have noticed the change to the neck blanks and cutaways on Rick basses given the level of scrutiny that Rickenbacker guitars and basses undergo on this forum.
User avatar
godber
Advanced Member
Posts: 2650
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 11:07 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by godber »

aceonbass wrote:I'm quite surprised that no one seems to have noticed the change to the neck blanks and cutaways on Rick basses given the level of scrutiny that Rickenbacker guitars and basses undergo on this forum.
I can't say that I articulated it very well but it was noticed...May 2010.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=395189&hilit=+Neck
User avatar
Captain Bob
Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 6:47 pm
Contact:

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by Captain Bob »

congerz83 wrote:For strings, I just bought a set of Pyramid Flats. Your thoughts?

FWIW, search the world for a set of Maxima's with the purple silk, and they would likely be more original. Subjectively, the TI JF344 flats are a more similar sound to the old Maxima on a Rick to me...YMMV. For their tension, they are not a stiff string, and one may need to acclimate, depending on the amount of stiffness your normally preferred brand exhibits .
4003S Mapleglo
Colonel Sanders
Intermediate Member
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:39 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by Colonel Sanders »

aceonbass wrote:I'm quite surprised that no one seems to have noticed the change to the neck blanks and cutaways on Rick basses given the level of scrutiny that Rickenbacker guitars and basses undergo on this forum.
I would disagree a bit with this. The variance from year to year is actually quite high. I really do not like the look of the new "deep cutaway" style with the pickguard going very close to the binding of the bottom wing. The engineer in me shivers at the lack of surface contact for a sturdy join at the neck- bottom wing interface near the neck pick up cavity.
1973 4001 Jetglo
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
teeder
Senior Member
Posts: 6396
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2004 5:00 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by teeder »

godber wrote:
aceonbass wrote:I'm quite surprised that no one seems to have noticed the change to the neck blanks and cutaways on Rick basses given the level of scrutiny that Rickenbacker guitars and basses undergo on this forum.
I can't say that I articulated it very well but it was noticed...May 2010.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=395189&hilit=+Neck
I remember that thread well.
User avatar
ram
Senior Member
Posts: 3743
Joined: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:55 pm

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by ram »

iamthebassman wrote:
ram wrote:don't forget the missing part of the pickgaurd down by the knobs.... progress pictures please!
I thought that broken pickguard was replaced years ago.
Yeah, I think it was... thought we were going for the 'original' post sanding look - Ram/early Wings days.
The only thing we can perceive are our perceptions - George Berkeley
User avatar
ilan
RRF Consultant
Posts: 2903
Joined: Thu Jun 13, 2002 7:00 pm

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by ilan »

aceonbass wrote:I'm quite surprised that no one seems to have noticed the change to the neck blanks and cutaways on Rick basses given the level of scrutiny that Rickenbacker guitars and basses undergo on this forum.
Now that you have pointed it out, I can't NOT see it.
"A Noble Instrument Must Be Nobly Regarded"
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by woodyng »

Captain Bob wrote:
congerz83 wrote:For strings, I just bought a set of Pyramid Flats. Your thoughts?

FWIW, search the world for a set of Maxima's with the purple silk, and they would likely be more original. Subjectively, the TI JF344 flats are a more similar sound to the old Maxima on a Rick to me...YMMV. For their tension, they are not a stiff string, and one may need to acclimate, depending on the amount of stiffness your normally preferred brand exhibits .
Yep,the old Maximas are the bomb,if you can find them,that is! The new Optima set seems to be the modern day choice for something close to them in feel and sound. And (alledgedly) the optimas are slightly beefier and less floppy than the TI set. I also like GHS flats,but they are nowhere near as good as the Maxima's. Pyramids,which sound and feel great,are sometimes a bit too much tension for some RicKs.
User avatar
johnallg
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 17688
Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 12:13 pm

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by johnallg »

Captain Bob wrote:
congerz83 wrote:For strings, I just bought a set of Pyramid Flats. Your thoughts?

FWIW, search the world for a set of Maxima's with the purple silk, and they would likely be more original. Subjectively, the TI JF344 flats are a more similar sound to the old Maxima on a Rick to me...YMMV. For their tension, they are not a stiff string, and one may need to acclimate, depending on the amount of stiffness your normally preferred brand exhibits .
The Optima 4099 strings are almost identical in feel and tone to the Maximas. I have both sets. The TI flats are not as close. IMHO

http://elderly.com/accessories/names/op ... 4099-4.htm
User avatar
Captain Bob
Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Thu May 27, 2010 6:47 pm
Contact:

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by Captain Bob »

johnallg wrote:
Captain Bob wrote:
congerz83 wrote:For strings, I just bought a set of Pyramid Flats. Your thoughts?

FWIW, search the world for a set of Maxima's with the purple silk, and they would likely be more original. Subjectively, the TI JF344 flats are a more similar sound to the old Maxima on a Rick to me...YMMV. For their tension, they are not a stiff string, and one may need to acclimate, depending on the amount of stiffness your normally preferred brand exhibits .
The Optima 4099 strings are almost identical in feel and tone to the Maximas. I have both sets. The TI flats are not as close. IMHO

http://elderly.com/accessories/names/op ... 4099-4.htm
Thanks for that information,.....and link! I recall the Optima's from years ago (the gold, etc.) But I wasn't aware of these.
4003S Mapleglo
User avatar
walker
Advanced Member
Posts: 2908
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 9:03 am
Contact:

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by walker »

Hey guys - just now jumping in. I'm happy that Rick bestowed upon me the honor of letting me do this fun project, which won't be without it's challenges, I'm sure! But before getting to the McCartnification of the bass, there was the first issue of the twist in the neck that Rick brought to my attention. It was indeed twisting heavy towards the G side, so I released the truss rod nuts to full relief to see what's what and discovered that the G-side nut was cranked pretty tight, possibly two full revolutions, while the E-side nut was pretty much already at full relief!

:roll:

So yeah... might be a little somethin'-somethin' going on there.

Once both rods were at full relief, the neck came pretty close to straightening out with a little coaxing. (The top angle of the nut is a little deceiving.)

Image


Then once the strings were tuned standard, the neck stayed pretty straight twist-wise.

Image


...but then it was revealed that the neck had quite a forward bow. This was the action at the 12th fret: :shock:

Image


At the neck pickup: :cry:

Image


I tightened both truss rods about one full revolution, and got the neck pretty straight, but the action at the 12th-fret neck pickup area was still unreasonably high with the bridge sitting flat on the tailpiece - height adjustment screws completely unscrewed.

Image

Image

Image


Then taking a good side view showed that the neck was drastically pitched forward at the neck/body wing intersection. Notice how far forward the neck is angled across the plane of the body - the neck at the first fret is actually above the body plane! Yet from fret-to-fret the neck is relatively straight.

Image

Full size image: http://imageshack.us/a/img7/2694/fgqt.jpg

So next I'll apply a steam-press treatment to see if I can get the neck back to human playing levels. Steams work great for remedying twists, but for correcting a jutting neck it could be tricky.
User avatar
heinpete
Veteran RRF member
Posts: 1730
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2001 10:08 pm

Re: The CORRECT McCartney Conversion...

Post by heinpete »

walker wrote: :roll:
...but then it was revealed that the neck had quite a forward bow. This was the action at the 12th fret: :shock:

Image
...
...hey, that's great, no fret buzz!!! :lol:
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”