To 3001, or not to 3001?

Vintage, Modern, V & C series, Fretless, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Post Reply
MikeZito
New member
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 1:42 pm

To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by MikeZito »

There is currently a 1976 3001 at Guitar Center. $999, non-original HSC (a Fender case, actually) - and I'm REALLY considering it. Any words of wisdom from previous 3001 players?
1937 Model 59 Lap Steel
c. 1960 S-100 Lap Steel
2008 620-FG (Modified)
2016 360-FG
User avatar
sloop_john_b
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 13843
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2005 6:00 am

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by sloop_john_b »

HEAVY.
MikeZito
New member
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2013 1:42 pm

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by MikeZito »

I am not easily frightened by 'heavy' . . . I used to play an original 1978 Music Man Stingray! (laugh)
1937 Model 59 Lap Steel
c. 1960 S-100 Lap Steel
2008 620-FG (Modified)
2016 360-FG
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by jdogric12 »

I'd be more worried that it won't hold its value. Recent ebay sales may be in the $900-1000 range but I can't imagine that lasting. I predict they'll continue to decline.
daveman
Member
Posts: 242
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2007 10:18 am

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by daveman »

jdogric12 wrote:I'd be more worried that it won't hold its value. Recent ebay sales may be in the $900-1000 range but I can't imagine that lasting. I predict they'll continue to decline.
I don't buy instruments as investments. I buy them to play. I have a 3001 and I play it out all the time. Sure, it's pretty heavy. Has an AMAZING neck, action as low as you like, and sounds great. My 2 cents.
User avatar
rickyfricky
Intermediate Member
Posts: 692
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:09 pm

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by rickyfricky »

Heavy for sure -- but worth the weight! 8)
Watch those teeth, Marlin. I'm not sure we've properly sedated the beast . . .
User avatar
Chris P
Junior Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2008 11:20 am
Contact:

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by Chris P »

I had a 3001 and two 3000s. Can't really remember them being that heavy. No lightweights, but not that heavy.
Very nice basses. Nice players. I liked the 3000 better. More of a special sound. The 3001 is very Rick-ish, with sometimes a bit of P.

I believe there's one for sale on bassoutpost.com too.
User avatar
kiramdear
RRF Moderator
Posts: 9045
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:51 am
Contact:

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by kiramdear »

Good, solid, player's bass, if that's what you're after. 8)
All I wanna do is rock!
Colonel Sanders
Intermediate Member
Posts: 842
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 10:39 am

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by Colonel Sanders »

jdogric12 wrote:I'd be more worried that it won't hold its value. Recent ebay sales may be in the $900-1000 range but I can't imagine that lasting. I predict they'll continue to decline.
I do not think you should bother about the depreciation of a $900 thingie.

To me, all Rickenbacker basses not starting with a 4 leave me pretty cold.
1973 4001 Jetglo
2017 4003S Jetglo
2023 4003 Mapleglo
2022 4005XC Jetglo
1979 MusicMan Stingray
2021 Epiphone Thunderbird
User avatar
jdogric12
Rick-a-holic
Posts: 10925
Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:00 am

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by jdogric12 »

Colonel Sanders wrote:
jdogric12 wrote:I'd be more worried that it won't hold its value. Recent ebay sales may be in the $900-1000 range but I can't imagine that lasting. I predict they'll continue to decline.
I do not think you should bother about the depreciation of a $900 thingie.

To me, all Rickenbacker basses not starting with a 4 leave me pretty cold.
I have a 2030GF that might change your mind - it did mine! :)

OP, go for it!
User avatar
jps
RRF Consultant
Posts: 37497
Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2003 6:00 am

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by jps »

jdogric12 wrote:
Colonel Sanders wrote:
jdogric12 wrote:I'd be more worried that it won't hold its value. Recent ebay sales may be in the $900-1000 range but I can't imagine that lasting. I predict they'll continue to decline.
I do not think you should bother about the depreciation of a $900 thingie.

To me, all Rickenbacker basses not starting with a 4 leave me pretty cold.
I have a 2030GF that might change your mind - it did mine! :)
I'll pile on here! Love my 2030GF. 8)
User avatar
bartyclue
Intermediate Member
Posts: 619
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:11 pm

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by bartyclue »

Great underated bass. I love mine and play it all the time. I doubt you will be disappointed.
User avatar
woodyng
Senior Member
Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 11:11 am

Re: To 3001, or not to 3001?

Post by woodyng »

A 3001 for under $1k does not seem like that bad of a deal to me,if the bass is in nice shape. It's not my cuppa Ricjoe,(too bulky) but i think they have a great sound. I like the pickup and the tone circuit on them,and the necks are nice,too.
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Basses: by Joey Vasco & Tony Cabibe”