Opinions needed: 620 vs 660: which is more versatile?

Vintage, Modern, V & C Series, Signature & Special Editions

Moderators: rickenbrother, ajish4

Skiptracer
New member
Posts: 13
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 8:16 am

Re: Opinions needed: 620 vs 660: which is more versatile?

Post by Skiptracer »

Funny thing.. I decided to get a 330 instead. If I love it, I'll get the 620 next.
Thanks for the responses! Friendly bunch around these parts. Rare on guitar forums.....
User avatar
Ric5150
Member
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 11:31 am

Re: Opinions needed: 620 vs 660: which is more versatile?

Post by Ric5150 »

Congrats on the acquisition. 330s are great as well. Just a warning that you will likely have to relax your policy and acquire at least one or two more. There quite addictive. :D

I haven't been on this forum for too long, but definitely a bunch of knowledgeable and helpful people here, and for the most part very friendly. In my first thread posted, a guy offered to send me a spare pickguard to trace. How do you beat that?
Life is suffering; the cause of suffering is desire. Envy is a deadly sin. Save your soul, go ahead and buy another one....
Clifton
Junior Member
Posts: 184
Joined: Thu Jan 08, 2009 3:54 pm

Re: Opinions needed: 620 vs 660: which is more versatile?

Post by Clifton »

Ric5150 wrote:
You could also buy a 620 and put toasters in it or buy a 660 and put high gains in it. The later would probably be the most "versatile" if you can handle/like the wider neck.
I'd like to try a toaster in the neck position of my 620, and keep the hi-gain in the bridge position. Has anyone tried this combination? Btw I love my 620. I agree that they're probably Rickenbacker's most versatile guitars.

The 330 is nice too-also more versatile than most people realize.
User avatar
Ric5150
Member
Posts: 321
Joined: Sun May 19, 2013 11:31 am

Re: Opinions needed: 620 vs 660: which is more versatile?

Post by Ric5150 »

Clifton wrote:
I'd like to try a toaster in the neck position of my 620, and keep the hi-gain in the bridge position. Has anyone tried this combination? Btw I love my 620. I agree that they're probably Rickenbacker's most versatile guitars.

The 330 is nice too-also more versatile than most people realize.
Apparently a couple of guys who know a little about Ricks (and guitars in general) thought it might be a good idea to go to a bridge humbucker in a 350 with a toaster in the neck.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid ... nt_count=1

So not as large a leap as that.

I left the scatter wound in the neck of my 660 and used a 'hot' 12k toaster in the bridge for a while. That made for a pretty nice balance, but I recently acquired some more 12k toasters and swapped the neck as well.

Might be worth a shot. I'm sure someone around here has tried it.
Life is suffering; the cause of suffering is desire. Envy is a deadly sin. Save your soul, go ahead and buy another one....
Post Reply

Return to “Rickenbacker Guitars: by John Simmons”